@FromDWade @brianmichaelf @PuliRudi Mount hasn’t always played as an attacker under Tuchel but he has mostly he was nearly always a midfielder under Lampard he must have 35 games in CM - we’ve seen Mount put up good numbers in attack this season which no other Chelsea player has shown he can do
@Arrizabalager @brianmichaelf @PuliRudi If a player goes on these kind of spells, all I’m saying is that he deserves as much criticism as other attackers, rather than being protected. And i see your point about his position now ty, so we should take that into account for every attacker, not just certain ones
@Arrizabalager @brianmichaelf @PuliRudi If a player goes on these kind of spells, all I’m saying is that he deserves as much criticism as other attackers, rather than being protected. And i see your point about his position now ty, so we should take that into account for every attacker, not just certain ones
@FromDWade @brianmichaelf @PuliRudi Yes he deserves criticism not denying it, he’s been poor lately but those stats aren’t right he also won MOTM in that time too and 1 of the games he played 9 mins another 25. Previous 5 games he got 2 MOTM and 6 GA. If anything it proves when Mount doesn’t play well Chelsea don’t
@Arrizabalager @brianmichaelf @PuliRudi He has subbed in for short times, but when others are criticized for similar spell of games, it’s to be noted they also don’t start every game. So everyone has to be held to an equal standard. The numbers show Pulisic also has similar GA at Chelsea, but the discourse is different
@FromDWade @brianmichaelf @PuliRudi Yes Pulisic has similar GA to minutes ratio but he’s played as an attacker in 95% of his games when Mount is 50% so it’s pretty clear that Mount’s output is much better it’s nothing against Pulisic just Mount is a better footballer these days. We need to upgrade at winger this
@Arrizabalager @brianmichaelf @PuliRudi Bro it’s clear that you’re just spitting out random numbers lol. Pulisic is not close to playing 95% of his time as an attacker, and Mount has been an attacker all season. That’s not disputable. Even under Lampard you just can’t say he didn’t get into attacking positions
@FromDWade @brianmichaelf @PuliRudi I never claimed he didn’t get in attacking positions I agree he did, Mount played as an attacker 95% of the time under Tuchel and in CM 95% of the time under Lampard. Pulisic has played most of his games for Chelsea as a winger and both players have similar output? Idg the issue
@Arrizabalager @FromDWade @PuliRudi I think we're getting off topic, this was never suppose to be Mount v Pulisic 😂😂 All I'm saying is 16 goals in 64 apps (19 as subs) is not some terrible statistic.
@brianmichaelf @FromDWade @PuliRudi Haha that’s true idk how we got onto it I’ll say Pulisic’s output is the best of a bad bunch really. But didn’t think the Hazard comparison (that was where we started lol).
@Arrizabalager @FromDWade @PuliRudi You calling Pulisic's output "the best of a bad bunch" is probably the nicest thing you've ever said about him, so I'll take the W.
@brianmichaelf @FromDWade @PuliRudi Haha nah I’ve always said I’d be happy for him to be used as a super sub like he was last season under Tuchel think I still agree with that