I refuse to be gaslit into believing that it's ok to evade legitimate questions about conflicts of interest by speculating about the emotional state of the asker. This happens all the time to women. Surely @Ayjchan is as sick of it as I am. And also, it's a pretty weak response
I refuse to be gaslit into believing that it's ok to evade legitimate questions about conflicts of interest by speculating about the emotional state of the asker. This happens all the time to women. Surely @Ayjchan is as sick of it as I am. And also, it's a pretty weak response https://t.co/Fg0B4TBJxf
@angie_rasmussen I agree that my earlier response was in poor form. I have now created a thread where anyone can comment. x.com/ayjchan/status…
@angie_rasmussen I agree that my earlier response was in poor form. I have now created a thread where anyone can comment. x.com/ayjchan/status…
@Ayjchan Great. I saw that you really did not address most of the concerns I raised, but perhaps you are not finished yet since you instead decided to fabricate more defamatory speculations about Eddie Holmes. I look forward to further clarifications.
@angie_rasmussen Can you clarify what defamatory speculations I have made about Ed Holmes? It is clear from the data deposited on the public NCBI database that he collaborated with the Wuhan Institute Virology lab suspected of being involved in #OriginOfCovid
@angie_rasmussen You mentioned in your thread that it was obvious (to who?) that Holmes had collaborated with the Wuhan scientists when he authored Proximal Origin and all the other manuscripts dismissing lab #OriginOfCovid - did none of the co-authors suggest declaring this obvious relationship?
@Ayjchan It was obvious to anyone who looked up Eddie’s publication record. Do you know why he was at Huanan market in 2014 when he took his raccoon dog pic? I do—it’s because his collaborators in Wuhan brought him there to see an environment they considered high risk for virus emergence.
@angie_rasmussen His collaborators at the Wuhan CDC are not the scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology - the latter collaboration was only revealed this summer. Just because a scientist works in Wuhan doesn't mean they are in the lab suspected to be involved in #OriginOfCovid
@Ayjchan I don’t care how many times you insinuated it in your book or asked leading questions about DEFUSE—there is no evidence to support these suspicions & they were not “suspected” when PO was written. As there’s no evidence, it wasn’t a conflict then and it’s not a conflict now.
@angie_rasmussen Have you seen the recently released emails? x.com/ayjchan/status…
@angie_rasmussen Have you seen the recently released emails? x.com/ayjchan/status…