NOW: According to legal analyst Glenn Kirschner, Donald Trump's social media posts aimed at Manhattan district attorney Alvin Bragg break state and federal laws. Kirschner believes that Trump's posts, especially one with a threatening image, were an effort to intimidate Bragg and contravene New York's legal statutes and federal laws concerning interstate communications. Trump has been targeting Bragg on his Truth Social media platform following reports of a possible indictment in the Stormy Daniels case.
If seeing Trump held accountable is of interest, follow @CalltoActivism
@BrianKarem Trump has been a bully his entire corrupt & criminal life!
@BrianKarem That’s how mob bosses intimidate people. They use ambiguous language like “it would be a shame if something happened to the DA, grand jury, or America” if he’s indicted. He’s been a New York mobster his entire life he knows how to skirt the law.
@BrianKarem That’s why when he was on with Hannity the other day he said that he had nothing to do with posting those photographs on his OWN social media platform. Of course, he blamed someone else and also said he never saw the images before they were posted. That’s how you know he did it.
@BrianKarem Makes me wonder if they’re now working on adding another obstruction charge for the threatening posts he’s made in the last week? 🤔
@BrianKarem @CalltoActivism sure..yeah. Let me know when someone tries to stop him. anyone. anytime. anywhere. Then that will be news. #LifetimeCriminal
@BrianKarem trump did this trump did that. He’s NEVER going to be held accountable for anything he’s done. I’d love to know how / why he wields so much power over those in a position to bring him down, he’s nothing but a corrupt bully who IS obviously above the law.
@BrianKarem The threats worked, Bragg backed down and will soon be followed by Willis and Garland. They're not prosecutors upholding the rule of law, they're political pawns.
@BrianKarem @redhead1558 If we can’t arrest him for a violent coup attempt and trying to overthrow our government (not to mention, possibly selling top secret documents), what makes you think the DOJ would pursue this?