@stltoday You mean she intends to buy votes for $500 per month.
@FreedompplMO @stltoday "Supporting poor families and making your constituents lives better = bad politcs" -Republicans
@The_Ron_Bomb @FreedompplMO @stltoday The government is not authorized to subsidize anyone or any company. Try reading and understanding the Constitution. I'm not affiliated with any party, just in case you made an assumption.
@CroonerFriday @FreedompplMO @stltoday Please show me the which article in the constitution that's stated. With that logic I'm also assuming you find social security unconstitutional?
@The_Ron_Bomb @FreedompplMO @stltoday It is unconstitutional. The Federal government isn't authorized to dictate how we decide to invest our money. You see, if it isn't in the Constitution, the government isn't supposed to be doing it. Read the Constitution.
@CroonerFriday @FreedompplMO @stltoday Also curious on your thoughts on the 10th amendment.
@The_Ron_Bomb @FreedompplMO @stltoday I fully support States Rights.
@CroonerFriday @FreedompplMO @stltoday You said if it isn't in the constitution then the government shouldn't be doing it. The 10th amendment also stays that anything not mentioned in the constitution goes to the power of the states. Not understanding where St. Louis does anything wrong here.
@The_Ron_Bomb @FreedompplMO @stltoday They should not be doing this because it makes people more reliant upon the government.
@CroonerFriday @FreedompplMO @stltoday See, THAT is not the same thing as it being unconstitutional.
@The_Ron_Bomb @FreedompplMO @stltoday Wanna bet the Supreme Court would say otherwise?
@CroonerFriday @FreedompplMO @stltoday Or you could prove it