The 4.5 billion dollar-per-year National Indigenous Australians Agency has been quick to deny itās been developing demands to be made by the voice to Parliament, revealed in a letter sent to my office last week. Iāll remind you what some of these demands were: ā¢Aborigines paying only 50 per cent the rate of income tax; ā¢Aboriginal groups owning beaches and national parks, and charging the rest of us to use them; ā¢10 per cent of all judges, magistrates, police officers, ADF officers, vice chancellors and ambassadors to be Aboriginal; ā¢no entry tests and no fees for Aborigines going to university; ā¢50 per cent discounts for Aborigines going to sport and music events on public land; ā¢Aborigines to have first claim on all public housing in Australia; ā¢reduced age of eligibility for the aged pension for Aborigines; ā¢rivers and streams to be owned by local Aborigines, who will charge the rest of us for water consumption; ā¢the same for mining royalties; ā¢all new liquor licences to be vetted by the voice; and ā¢the voice office being the same size, and having the same budget, as the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet. As I said, the NIAA has been quick to deny this āaction listā for the voice, and no wonder! If any these demands were met, 97 per cent of Australians would be made second-class citizens based solely on race. However, minutes of government organisations meetings with Aboriginal groups around the country obtained through a freedom of information request show these sort of demands are being discussed. These include: ā¢exclusive sovereignty for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people over land and waters; ā¢creating a new Aboriginal state from land under native title, with its own constitution; ā¢a treaty or treaties recognised in the Australian Constitution; ā¢racially-exclusive designated seats in Parliament reserved only for Aborigines; ā¢Aborigines to receive a fixed percentage of all Australian gross national product; ā¢Aborigines to be exempted from paying land tax; ā¢funding for the voice to Parliament to be generated from percentages of land and water taxes; ā¢funding for Aboriginal bodies and programs to be linked to reparations for ātheft of landā; ā¢creation of a āblack Parliamentā; ā¢a race-based rent tax from āan open cheque bookā; ā¢race-based āinherentā rights for Aboriginal people in the Australian Constitution; ā¢renaming more towns and landmarks after Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people; ā¢the creation of āsovereign wealthā exclusively for Aborigines; ā¢Australian taxpayers to fund the preservation of Aboriginal languages; ā¢changing the Australian flag because it āsymbolises the injustices of colonisationā; ā¢tearing down statues of explorers; ā¢enshrining Aboriginal ātraditional ways of lifeā in the Constitution; ā¢changing the curriculum in all schools for non-indigenous Australians; ā¢āde-colonisingā Australia; and ā¢fee-free access for Aborigines to sport and recreation, including free sporting equipment. Like the demands contained in the letter sent to me, many of these would also make most Australians second-class citizens in our own country. The 4.5 billion dollar NIAA has been actively discussing them with Aboriginal groups for years. These are the dangers of putting the voice to Parliament in the Constitution. For these and many other reasons, itās why Australians must vote NO in Anthony Albaneseās racist referendum.
@PaulineHansonOz Fine. That let us define an Aboriginal person as someone with "at least" 25% aboriginal blood. That is the standard in the USA for indigenous North American Indians.
@Kipsleyanne @PaulineHansonOz So, only ppl who have a full blooded Aboriginal person as a grand parent. Wake up to yourself.