When a high ranking political appointee claims on national tv that when people criticize him: "They're really criticizing science, because I [Tony Fauci] represent science; that's dangerous" That's really dangerous. It subverts scientific inquiry, free thought and democracy🧵1
When a high ranking political appointee claims on national tv that when people criticize him: "They're really criticizing science, because I [Tony Fauci] represent science; that's dangerous" That's really dangerous. It subverts scientific inquiry, free thought and democracy🧵1
@samanthaagodwin You're missing the point that there's a huge difference between questioning someone's scientific views and assassinating someone's character and using pseudoscience and disinformation as the basis for that character assassination.
@SigmaGhost1 @samanthaagodwin I've never heard such 🐂💩 in my life 🤣. I tell you what - tell me one claim he made that wasn't true and I'll think about taking you seriously. Just one. No pressure.
@SigmaGhost1 @samanthaagodwin 🤦♂️ They are highly effective (but not perfect) at all of those. He never claimed vaccines were the ONLY solution (prove me wrong if you can). The research that NIAID funded "could not have possibly been the source" of Covid. niaid.nih.gov/diseases-condi…