The University of Minnesota has a long diatribe about the value of n95s despite the recent negative RCT- and look who funds them 👇👇👇👇 3M! Are you shitting me? Taking 3M money and making 3M talking points. Should be illegal cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspecti…
Medicine is such a corrupt field I thought oncology was bad I catalogued the conflicts in malignant But COVID policy--especially useless testing-- was the worst
@VPrasadMDMPH Once again, it is incorrect to refer to that study as a negative RCT of the effectiveness/value of N95 masks. 🤦♂️ It's fine to critique them for taking 3M money, but . . .
@VPrasadMDMPH Vinay, Vinay...it's time. There's evidence of nearly a half million mRNA vax deaths. You can't be blind to this crime of the century. Refute it, fine, but we don't care about the lack of random control mask studies anymore. Someone please tell Vinay
@VPrasadMDMPH Now do against no masks at all! Negligible results I am willing to bet!
@VPrasadMDMPH What does the first M in 3M stand for? That's your answer.
@VPrasadMDMPH Experts who try to refute findings of this RCT (N95 vs surgical mask) frequently claim that healthcare workers may got infected outside of medical facilities. They don't seem to understand that this makes any kind of masking useless :)
@VPrasadMDMPH I'm shocked it didn't also read....brought to you by Pfizer
@VPrasadMDMPH Reminds me of @abbvie funding films that indoctrinate kids in leftist trans ideology, nudging them toward discovering a trans identity, where Abbvie will be waiting with pricey puberty blockers. Their most recent cinematic triumph is "Mama Has a Mustache". mamahasamustache.com