Thousands of different pandemic opinions are being censored, not just one. That's where the blind spot happens on this topic. You think there are "sides." If that's the frame, censoring one side looks evil. I see all "obviously wrong" interpretations of data getting banned.
Thousands of different pandemic opinions are being censored, not just one. That's where the blind spot happens on this topic. You think there are "sides." If that's the frame, censoring one side looks evil. I see all "obviously wrong" interpretations of data getting banned.
Clarifier 1: Obviously censors can't be trusted to always get it right. But they'd also ban Fauci from saying vaccines are so safe you should get twenty of them in a week. They target the obviously dangerous stuff.
@ScottAdamsSays Why do we need to censor at all? It's part of the problem we increasingly have, when ideas/speech is not exercised freely or interfered with: we lose practice on our ability to discern truth from propaganda. Let the information flow and the public will sort it out.