Though I understand the perspective, disagree. By spec’ing to human shape and size you guarantee backward compatibility with the existing built world. Backward compatibility with extant infrastructure is critical for successful proliferation of transformative tech (imv)
Though I understand the perspective, disagree. By spec’ing to human shape and size you guarantee backward compatibility with the existing built world. Backward compatibility with extant infrastructure is critical for successful proliferation of transformative tech (imv)
@elonmusk @wintonARK Would it be a good idea to build one with a GOLDORAK size ... might be useful to catch back STARSHIP instead of MECHAZILLA chopsticks 🤣 ?
@elonmusk @wintonARK Hey, I've done ML, can I work with you in tesla?
@elonmusk @wintonARK Elon, Is there any sort of white paper or tech specs documented for public consumption of what was presented at AI Day? More specifically, the Dojo section? Thank you.
@elonmusk @wintonARK That’s a benefit and humanoid robots is an alluring goal. But it’s ultimately far too limiting a vision. There is far more upside in creating robots that augment humans instead of merely replacing them. Don’t fall for The Turing Trap digitaleconomy.stanford.edu/news/the-turin…
@elonmusk @wintonARK At what point will the humanoids demand, not equal rights because they aren’t equal.. but superior rights? The time to answer this question is now…
@elonmusk @wintonARK You think so clearly Elon ✅
@elonmusk @wintonARK These are the forms of robots in cartoon back in the childhood days. Friend of humans
@elonmusk @wintonARK Looking forward to more details on how training data will be derived from actual human kinematics.
@elonmusk @wintonARK paradoxically, development depends on how well we are able to reproduce human behavior it will be the success of ai and the success of civilization