As shown here, You can talk about Eric Adams' remarks in a way that addresses what he's actually talking about or in a way that's designed to play off Adams derangement, and the engagement varies accordingly.
@jbarro Adams is winning me over more and more every day
@jbarro the people falling for that first example are...precisely who you think they'd be
@jbarro Manhattan, Park Slope and Long Island City voters upset that the people of the Bronx, and the working class neighborhoods in Bklyn, SI and Queens got their candidate. Whose interests are they really looking out for? Do they know better than the voters that put him in office?
@jbarro I like the 2nd one as you are able to have a discussion with policy matters compared to the first comment nothing can be expanded on there it's a conversation stopper.
@jbarro reminds me of the "controversy" around Yang and his comments on the mentally ill committing attacks maybe in another timeline, Yang and Adams would be friends lol
@jbarro @neontaster Ross is a rare honest voice in a sea of activist “journos”
@jbarro The problem with Twitter amplification in one post. It's optimized for sophistry and polemics.