Mystery witness in Monday’s grand jury: David Pecker of National Inquirer. His testimony can show the scheme was designed to affect outcome of election. He reportedly communicated directly with Trump on payment (The Fixers by @joe_palazzolo @mrothfeld) nytimes.com/2023/03/27/nyr…
2. For those asking whether Pecker's testimony may help Trump, recall Pecker has already testified before the grand jury. We also have AMI's/Pecker's damaging admissions in the federal non-prosecution agreement.👇👇 Bragg likely knows what he's getting, and it rebuts Costello.
@rgoodlaw @joe_palazzolo @mrothfeld I still think that tax evasion on the hush 💵 will be a second or third count.
@rgoodlaw @joe_palazzolo @mrothfeld Wait, so questioning elections isn't treasonous anymore?
@rgoodlaw @joe_palazzolo @mrothfeld INTENTION... is everything. It's pretty convincing that there's sufficient evidence to prove that based on the timing, Donald Trump was urgent in his need to keep Stormy Daniels silent up through the election. HE KNEW her reveal would hurt his chances significantly.
@rgoodlaw @MalcolmNance @joe_palazzolo @mrothfeld If anyone looks like an informant, it's Pecker.
@rgoodlaw @joe_palazzolo @mrothfeld If the SDNY original 41 pg draft indictment of Cohen (reduced to 29 pg per Billy Barr meddling) is in Bragg's hands, then subject #1 is in for a rude awakening.
@rgoodlaw @feline_cannon @joe_palazzolo @mrothfeld Wait. The word of the publisher of National Enquirer is going to be taken seriously in a court of law?