@50megatonFbomb @Mike82784912 @joerogan Sensible medicine that looks at A) spacing out dose 1 and 2, or B) only mandating 1 or 2 doses vs 2 and 3 doeses given the saftey signals and the fact the we need more robust data before mandating boosters given that dose 2 and 3 show higher myocarditis than covid itsself 2/
@50megatonFbomb @Mike82784912 @joerogan I think its a detriment to vaccine confidence to blindly say we should mandate a 16 year old to have a booster when the data is very equivocal. Perhaps watch the video, I also dont understand what is difficult for you to understand about these arguments 🙏
@50megatonFbomb @Mike82784912 @joerogan Nuance matters
@PadaPrabu @Mike82784912 @joerogan You've completely changed the subject lol. The question from the beginning was: risk of vaccine myo vs. Risk of covid myo, which is disingenuous framing anyway because covid carries additional complications. Spacing doses, mandates, etc...that's a different discussion.
@50megatonFbomb @Mike82784912 @joerogan 2/ No mandates are not a seperate discussion because policy and vaccination are now inextricably linked. You are not following the plot
@PadaPrabu @Mike82784912 @joerogan Idk man, this was the original exchange that prompted me to comment. And while there *may* be some debate about the incident rate among teens receiving moderna, the absolute risk of cardiac damage is plainly higher for unvaxed covid patients in that demo.
@50megatonFbomb @Mike82784912 @joerogan Assumed you would have read the article you specifically claimed "misinterprets the data". Could have avoided this whole back and forth of you had 🤷♂️ Anyway your arguing against a position i dont hold, so we'll let this one go
@PadaPrabu @50megatonFbomb @Mike82784912 @joerogan Damn, that was some serious debating going on over an article that he hadn't even read😬🤦♂️ Twitter should have a function that doesn't allow people to comment on articles until they actually read them!😅🙄