@50megatonFbomb @PadaPrabu @Mike82784912 @joerogan Vinay stratified risk according to age & gender, subsequently discussing the risk to benefit ratio in a very specific subgroup. Your point about MC not being counted would likely *under* represent MC cases in the vax group too, especially using the ICD-10 coding system.
@scottinnerfocus @PadaPrabu @Mike82784912 @joerogan Yeah he specifically excluded the other cardiac issues for his substack but, again, I'm really wondering why a self-limited case of MC is more concerning than multi-system organ failure.
@50megatonFbomb @scottinnerfocus @Mike82784912 @joerogan FFS dingus, the substack doesnt say "get no vaccination"!!! Its specifically looking at the risk to benefit profile of M>40 who have already had 2 doses getting a 3rd, or spacing between dose 1 and 2 to prevent the MC spike post dose 2 in that demographic. WHY DONT U GET IT
@PadaPrabu @50megatonFbomb @Mike82784912 @joerogan Yes, hes strawmanning the argument, conflating *no vaccination* w the specific argument that M under 40 need to be aware that following dose 2 their risk of MC is very high (spacing argument),& in particular,does a booster confer a benefit given MC risks if already well protected
@scottinnerfocus @PadaPrabu @Mike82784912 @joerogan No, I'm not. You guys are just acting as if MC is the only risk of a covid infection and you're not even accounting for the severity differences between viral MC and the more commonly mild vax MC.
@50megatonFbomb @PadaPrabu @Mike82784912 @joerogan Here's the issue: We dont have clear data from any RCT on the benefits of a booster for M <40 (i.e. preventing covid MC), but we do have good data that the booster increases vax MC rate Do u want to expose your 16yo to KNOWN risks for unknown benefit? google.com/amp/s/nymag.co…
@scottinnerfocus @PadaPrabu @Mike82784912 @joerogan Most people who are hospitalized with covid aren't being hospitalized for MC so this insistence on pretending that MC is the only adverse covid outcome (while ignoring that viral MC is more severe) is repackaged anti-vax bullshit.
@50megatonFbomb @scottinnerfocus @Mike82784912 @joerogan Health care policy is a complicated topic, so it doesnt suprise me that you dont understand it He literally linked to an interview with Dr Paul Offit-FDA’s vaccine advisory committee member,the most pro vax person imaginable Read the article,& save everyones time on this thread
@PadaPrabu @scottinnerfocus @Mike82784912 @joerogan Yeah, I'm aware of how Offit feels and there are other qualified individuals who feel differently.
@50megatonFbomb @scottinnerfocus @Mike82784912 @joerogan Wow.Incredible So you stand behind your tweet that Offit,who literally wrote this book extolling vaccines one of medicines "greatest lifesaving breakthroughs" is a"repackaged antivaxer" The word antivaxer means absolutely nothing if youre applying it in such an unprincipled way
@PadaPrabu @50megatonFbomb @Mike82784912 @joerogan 😅yea the director of Vaccine Education at CHP is using "repackaged anti vax bullshit" Ok random troll "50megatonFbomb". I'm going to bed. You're ideologically captured & not interested in changing your mind no matter how much contradictory argument & evidence is presented