Interesting!
@stgoldst @gtuckerkellogg Makes me wonder if swabbers were set out to find an airborne virus wafting about in the air 160+ ft &before landing anywhere, everywhere. On 12Jan'20, more likely not.
@MJnanostretch @stgoldst ??? Since the market was closed from Jan 1, it wasn't teeming with infected people. Why they waited so long to collect is curious. Why Gao et al (in 2022!) left all the wildlife market samples out of their origins analysis is "curiouser"
@gtuckerkellogg @stgoldst Well, define "teeming". Several infected people might be sufficient... up to 174/7%= 2486 total Dec infections. 1Jan went back 12Jan, returned, they were on to something, sequenced by then? Yes re: Gao, or was it CN? What's "???" supposed to mean?
@MJnanostretch @stgoldst The ??? was my surprise at that being your focus, given the several obviously problematic aspects of their analysis. Where do you get 2486 December infections?
@gtuckerkellogg @stgoldst Maybe you should block me because I shouldn't be taken srsly...???
@MJnanostretch @stgoldst I have no idea what you are talking about. Your comment on this thread (the one with the image) seemed to move the focus toward something entirely different from what others were discussing, for reasons I cannot fathom. My reply was a shorthand move back to the main topic
@gtuckerkellogg @MJnanostretch @stgoldst He does that a lot due to cognitive dissonance
@TheEthanIverson @gtuckerkellogg @stgoldst *Wonder if swabbers considered an airborne virus wafting 160+ ft before landing anywhere, everywhere, 12Jan'20? *2-3 infected regulars m/b sufficient &up to 174/7%=2486 total Dec? *12Jan, returned, sequenced by then?Spillbacks likely by then, right? *How decide Gao vs CN talking?
@MJnanostretch @TheEthanIverson @gtuckerkellogg What did I say about your antics in my replies?