Geoff Roberts @GeoffRoberts61

There’s a generation a lot of people forget exists. We were born at the tail end of the Boomers, but we are not culturally the same as people born in the 40s and early 50s. We are Generation Jones. And honestly, it explains a lot. We grew up in a world that still felt fundamentally analog, but we were young enough to be dragged headfirst into the digital revolution. We are the bridge generation between rotary phones and smartphones, between slide rules and AI, between Walter Cronkite and algorithm driven media. We remember when there were only a few television channels and the entire country watched the same thing at the same time. We also adapted to the internet, email, forums, social media, streaming and now artificial intelligence. We lived before and after the technological singularity hit everyday life. That is not a small thing. People born in the 40s came of age in a post World War II America that was still industrial, deeply hierarchical and institutionally stable. Their formative years were shaped by the Cold War, Vietnam, the civil rights era and a society where information moved slowly. Generation Jones came later. We inherited the aftermath of all of that. We were the kids who watched Watergate destroy blind trust in government. We watched manufacturing begin to collapse. We saw divorce rates explode. We were the first truly latchkey generation in massive numbers. We learned independence early because many of us had to. We grew up with one foot in old America and one foot in whatever this new thing was becoming. We played outside until the streetlights came on but we also learned DOS commands. We learned cursive and keyboarding. We had card catalogs and Google searches. We went from vinyl records to cassette tapes to CDs to MP3s to streaming in one lifetime. We remember maps. We remember memorizing phone numbers. We remember life before GPS and before every human interaction became filtered through a screen. And because of that, I think Generation Jones developed a very unique perspective. We are adaptable because we had no choice but to adapt. We learned technology as adults instead of being born into it. We remember a slower world but were forced to survive in a rapidly accelerating one. That creates a very different mindset than either older Boomers or younger Gen X and Millennials. A lot of us also reject the caricature people now associate with “Boomers.” We were not buying houses for the cost of a sandwich in 1965. The interest rate on my first house was over 14% and that was after buying down a point. Many of us got hit by recessions, outsourcing, pension collapses and economic instability just like younger generations did. We watched promises evaporate in real time. We understand older generations because we were raised by them. We understand younger generations because we had to evolve alongside them. That’s why the Jones generation often feels culturally homeless. We are rarely discussed, rarely defined and usually lumped into categories that don’t actually fit us. But we exist. We are the human transition point between the industrial age and the digital age. And frankly, there will probably never be another generation quite like us again.

Let’s take a look at just some Restore Britain policies, and you tell me if these make us nazi monsters… - The largest deportation programme ever seen in Britain to remove those migrants living in our country illegally. The entire asylum system will be abolished. The boats will stop. - Net negative immigration. Far more must leave than arrive. - If a foreign national can’t speak English, lives in social housing, claims benefits, doesn’t work, hates our way of life - they go too. If millions go, millions go. - Close entire visa routes from countries proven to supply us with illegals, criminals and sex pests. The immigration ‘Red List’. We will discriminate. - Fairer spouse visas - so that British men and women can bring their spouses to Britain without the endless bureaucracy and cost currently inflicted on them. - An overhaul of British agriculture that puts growing and farming at the heart of any policy for rural Britain. Food security is national security. Slash red tape, simplify payments, ease planning laws, encourage farm diversification and more. Crucially, help youngsters into agriculture. We will ensure a level playing field for British farmers. - Restore Britain will force the British public sector will buy British - it will support British farmers, producers and small businesses. - We will encourage and fund youngsters to take up apprenticeships and learn a proper skill instead of some bullshit university degree. Teach children at school the life skills they will actually need in modern Britain. - An education system that teaches, respects and celebrates British history and the triumphant contribution our little island has made to the world. - Businesses freed from crushing regulation, red tape and tax. Reward hard work. Let entrepreneurs enjoy their success. - Lowest corporation tax in Europe. IR35 scrapped. VAT threshold doubled. HMRC brutally slashed back. Dividend thresholds raised. - High streets restored. Safe, secure and welcoming. Business rates for small businesses abolished. Turkish barbers, vape shops and other suspicious businesses investigated. Graffiti cleaned, litter picked. Pavements fixed. We will make Britain clean again, and we will take pride in our communities again. - We will implement free parking in select areas to drive back footfall from the retail parks and back into our town centres. Councils will be forced to accept common sense. - Fly-tippers will be crushed under the law. It will not be tolerated. Foreigners indulging in the destruction of our countryside will be deported. - Personal tax slashed. Trust families to spend their money, not the bureaucrats. - Put pro-family policy at the heart of everything we do. If British families want to have more children, let’s use the power of the state to enable that. Make childcare more accessible and more affordable. - Reform family courts - so that good, decent fathers, and mothers, are not kept away from their children for malicious reasons. This is important. - Trust parents to make the best decisions for their families. A limited number of days for a term-time holiday for well-developed children. This is just common sense. - Restore Britain will make Britain safe again. No-nonsense policing that does what it needs to do. Widespread stop and search back - accusations of racism will stop nothing. Brutal sentences for carrying a knife. Foreign criminals deported, third world sex pests removed before their feet can touch the ground. - Welfare radically slashed back. Those who can work, will work. Litter picking, graffiti cleaning, whatever else. Don’t like it? No benefits. That simple. - Support those Brits who genuinely need the help, particularly children, but under a Restore Britain Government the piss-take will end. - A foreign policy that puts the British interest above all else - proudly and unapologetically. We won’t participate in never-ending foreign wars. We will act when, and only when, the British interest is served. - Rebuild and rearm Britain. We will have a big stick, and we will wave it when we want. - A comprehensive support system for British veterans - including fast tracked recruitment into immigration enforcement field roles. - Arbitrary foreign aid targets that serve no British interests, gone. - Restore Britain will reverse the creeping islamification of Britain - no burqas, sharia courts, halal slaughter and so on. Cousin marriage will be banned. If you want to sleep with your family, this is not the country for you. This is Britain, we do things our way. - Anti-white racism, eradicated. No more DEI. The woke bullshit will end. - Self-defence rights restored. If an intruder tries to kill you in your home, and they end up dead? So be it. That’s their problem. Pepper spray legalised. - End the war on motorists. Cut fuel duty, no more 20mph zones. Sort out our decaying road network. - Biological reality respected. Men are men. Women are women. No amount of surgery will ever change that. - Inheritance tax abolished - for farms, for small businesses, for everyone. The scam will end. Death will no longer be taxed under a Restore Britain Government. - An infrastructure first housing policy. Developers forced to fund proper infrastructure before a shovel goes in the ground. British homes for British families. - A Government that prioritises building roads, bridges and projects HERE in Britain. Can you even imagine it?! - We will purse a British first energy strategy. Net zero will be scrapped. Domestic energy production will be ruthlessly prioritised. - End the lockdown legacy. Inquiry into COVID vaccine harms, lockdown convictions quashed, a truly independent look at how that was all allowed to happen. - No Digital ID, ever. Repeal the Online Safety Act. Protect free speech. - Defund the rotten BBC. Make it a subscription service and let it wither on the vine. - A binding referendum on the reintroduction of the death penalty for the most evil criminals. One of my favourites. - A national strategy, working from the findings of the rape gang inquiry, to ruthlessly tackle and decapitate the national crime network of primarily Pakistani muslim sexual slavery, torture and murder. - Restore Britain will end political Islam. Abolish postal voting except for those in genuine need. Remove voting rights for foreign nationals. - Foreign language translation ended, in the NHS and beyond. You live in England, you speak English. - The NHS will be restored as the NATIONAL health service. Serving British people as its first and only priority. It will accept ultra-high skilled migrants to work, it will not support millions of low-skilled migrants who contribute nothing, yet take so much. - Free car parking for NHS staff, patients and visitors on tight permits. We all pay for the NHS, we shouldn’t be ripped off for the sodding parking too. Especially medical staff. - Medical school caps will be demolished. We will allow talented young British men and women to train in medicine - the NHS will then be forced to employ them over foreign staff. We will prioritise our own people. - Reclaim our fisheries - take back our seas and take back our fish. We will take back control. Finally. - The quangocracy will end. Power will be returned to the people through their MPs. Parliament will be empowered. - Restore Britain will crush the parasitic state. It will all be hacked back in the most spectacular fashion. Unlike anything Britain has seen before. I cannot wait. A Restore Britain Government will protect our people, protect our interests, protect our borders. We will leave you alone to build a business, work hard, raise a family and enjoy your success in a safe and secure Britain. Finally, a political party that will put the British people first. Restore Britain.

Having served nearly a quarter of a century in the British Army, I stood alongside some of the proudest and most humble people you’ll ever meet. There are tens of thousands of us. People you wouldn’t expect. People who don’t talk about it — except maybe on Remembrance Sunday, over a quiet beer. I’m Gen X. Uncompromising in my values. I want every generation — X, Y, Z… and those still to come — to have the same courage and opportunity that shaped me. I’ve got children. I’ve got grandchildren. I’ve been married 40 years this year. My values aren’t for sale. They never will be. And I know this — there are millions of us who feel exactly the same. We just needed a moment where standing firm and standing proud was the only option left. This morning was different. 05:30, like always. But it wasn’t despair that woke me — it was hope. Determination. Something is happening. You can see it. You can feel it. People standing up. Being counted. As this grows — and it will — there’ll be noise, slurs, accusations. To that I say, without apology: you’ve already lost. We have what it takes. And we’re not going anywhere. To everyone who’s followed — thank you. I’ve followed back. That matters. That’s how this grows. So take the time. Support each other. Follow genuine accounts. We are here. You can count us. You can judge us. But understand this.......! We don’t care. I'm all in.

Britain Is Sleepwalking Into Lebanon. Lebanon did not fall overnight. It was once the most cosmopolitan, pluralist state in the Arab world. Beirut was the Paris of the Middle East. A functioning democracy. A free press. A Christian majority that built a nation generous enough to welcome those who came. It believed that openness would be met with openness. That tolerance would be reciprocated. That good faith was a universal language. It wasn't. It never is. The Palestinians arrived after 1948 and in their hundreds of thousands after 1970, expelled from Jordan with their militias intact. The Lebanese state, too timid to enforce its own sovereignty, allowed armed factions to operate as a state within a state. Then Iran exported its revolution westward and Hezbollah was born, funded from Tehran, running its own hospitals, schools, courts and welfare networks. It made the Lebanese state optional for an entire community. Every accommodation encouraged the next demand. Every retreat was read as weakness, because it was. The civil war that followed lasted fifteen years and killed 150,000 people. But the war was merely the violent expression of something that had already happened. The state had lost its monopoly on violence. Communities had retreated into armed confessional blocs. The centre had hollowed out. Lebanon was already two countries sharing a flag but not a future. The Christians didn't lose because they were cruel. They lost because they were naive. They believed demographic generosity could be squared with political stability. They believed armed factions could be absorbed into a civic order. Power follows population. Identity hardens under pressure. Every community with a coherent creed will eventually act on its interests. The moral high ground is not a defence. In Lebanon it became a grave marker. Now look at Britain. Since 2018, boats have arrived on the Kent coast carrying tens of thousands of men, the overwhelming majority unvetted and undocumented, from Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan and Eritrea. They are housed and supported at public expense while the state performs the pantomime of processing them. Anyone who raises the subject is accused of racism before the sentence is finished. This is not immigration. It is the progressive dissolution of Britain's right to determine who enters its own territory. The parallel institutions are already here. Sharia courts operating alongside civil law. Educational environments teaching loyalty to the Ummah rather than to Britain. Areas where policing is negotiation, investigations are quietly dropped, and the state modifies its own behaviour for fear of communal reaction. In Lebanon they called it accommodation. They kept calling it accommodation right up until the checkpoints went up. The electoral bloc pressure is already here. Candidates selected on the basis of foreign conflicts. Representatives answering to communal leaderships rather than constituents. The institutional failure is already here. The Charity Commission investigated the Islamic Centre of England for three years. Little changed. Universities host vigils for mass murderers and hold nobody accountable. Prevent is applied selectively. Everyone knows it. Nobody says it. Lebanon did not collapse because its enemies were strong. It collapsed because its institutions were weak. Because it confused tolerance with the abandonment of standards. Because it believed the centre would hold without anyone holding it. Britain is not Lebanon yet. But Lebanon wasn't Lebanon yet, once. It drifted. Demographics shifted. Parallel loyalties hardened. The state lost the nerve to enforce a single standard of law. Bit by bit the centre hollowed out. We are drifting. The question is whether anyone in authority will admit it. Before the drift becomes a current too strong to swim against. "Power follows population. Identity hardens under pressure. Every community with a coherent creed will eventually act on its interests."

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

There is a new belief taking hold among Britain's institutions, and it is as dangerous as it is dishonest. The countryside, we are told, is "too white." Not green. Not rural. Not historic. White. And therefore a problem to be fixed. This is not satire. It is official policy. Government-commissioned reports now describe England's hills, fields, pubs and footpaths as a "white environment" that risks becoming "irrelevant" unless it is reshaped to reflect a "multicultural nation." Rural authorities are instructed to attract specific ethnic groups, redesign access, rewrite interpretation, adjust behaviour, and rebrand culture itself. All paid for by the taxpayer. This is not about access to nature. No one is barred from walking in the countryside. There are no gates marked by race. What is being objected to is not exclusion, but presence. The wrong people, in the wrong numbers, in the wrong place. Solitude is suspect. Pubs are "problematic." Dogs are a "barrier." Englishness itself is quietly reframed as a form of hostility. Once again, the pattern is familiar. First the language. Then the targets. Then the money. Culture is recast as a flaw. Continuity becomes "dominance." History is reduced to optics. And the group that built, sustained and preserved these places is told – politely, bureaucratically – that it must adapt or move aside. What makes this moment different is that the countryside was never in crisis. Cities were transformed by pressure, density, and policy failure. The countryside was stable. Rooted. That stability is precisely why it is now being targeted. It stands as a rebuke to the idea that constant demographic churn is inevitable or desirable. So it must be corrected. This is demographic engineering, not conservation. The state has decided that England's national landscape reflects the wrong story, and that story must be rewritten. Marketing is altered to show the "right" faces. Outreach is targeted at the "right" groups. Behaviour norms are revised. The land remains, but the meaning is changed. We are told this is because "we all pay for it." But that argument collapses on contact with reality. If something truly belongs to everyone, you do not single out one group as a problem and instruct it to change. You do not racialise shared space. You do not treat existing culture as a barrier to be dismantled. That is not inclusion. It is displacement by policy. The same logic now runs through housing, planning and migration. New towns dropped onto villages. Farmland sacrificed. Infrastructure ignored. Numbers driving everything, consent nowhere. The countryside is no longer a living inheritance but a blank surface onto which officials project social outcomes. And notice the asymmetry. One group must always adapt. One culture must always soften, explain itself, dilute itself. The others are affirmed, accommodated, reassured. That alone tells you this is not about fairness. It is about power. Once you accept that England itself is a racial problem, nothing is safe. Not villages. Not landscapes. Not history. What survives only does so until the next report declares it "unrepresentative." The countryside does not need re-education. It does not need racial quotas, rewritten customs, or academic lectures about who belongs. It needs defending because when the state decides a country's heartland is "too white," it has already decided the country itself must change. And once continuity is broken, it does not return. "The wrong people, in the wrong numbers, in the wrong place. Solitude is suspect. Pubs are "problematic." Dogs are a "barrier." Englishness itself is quietly reframed as a form of hostility."

Britain is taking a decision that demands far more scrutiny than it is receiving. Large numbers of single adult men of fighting age are being housed in sites across the country, including former military facilities near towns and villages, while the public is told there is "no cause for concern." These men are free to come and go, despite identities and backgrounds that remain largely unknown. Any serious state treats its border as a security filter. When that filter fails, control tightens. This government has chosen to loosen it. This does not require lurid claims or conspiracy thinking. It requires only a basic understanding of risk. When people arrive without documents, without verified histories, and without enforceable removal pathways, the state does not know who it is hosting. Some will be harmless. Some will not. The harm does not need to be widespread to be catastrophic for those on the receiving end. Public safety is not built on averages. It is built on worst cases. The government insists these arrangements are temporary. Processing, then removal. But removal is the weak link the public no longer believes in. Appeals, injunctions, human-rights litigation and ECHR constraints turn failed claims into long residence. Time passes. Roots form. Enforcement evaporates. "Temporary" hardens into permanent by default. The state knows this. The public knows this. Only the language pretends otherwise. What is missing from this debate is the most basic question of all: has this been thought through as a security problem? Not as a moral narrative or a budget line, but as a vulnerability. Hundreds of men housed together, unsupervised, networked, mobile, with access to phones and contacts, placed near communities that never consented – that is not neutral. It creates exposure. It creates friction. It creates opportunity for exploitation by criminals, extremists, and hostile actors who understand how to move quietly through crowded systems. Britain already acknowledges the existence of tens of thousands of individuals of concern on terror watchlists. It has disrupted foreign state plots on British soil. It accepts that hostile regimes use migration routes to apply pressure and sow instability. Yet it asks the public to believe that none of this context matters when deciding how and where to house undocumented men. That is not credible. This is not an accusation against every individual housed. It is an indictment of a governing approach that refuses to ask hard questions before acting. Who supervises these sites day to day? What thresholds trigger intervention? How quickly can individuals be detained if concerns arise? What happens when local policing is overwhelmed? What is the contingency when removal fails? Silence on these points is not reassurance. It is dereliction. There is also a deeper signal being sent. Military sites exist for defence, readiness and national purpose. When they are repurposed to manage the consequences of a failed border, while veterans face prosecution and forces are stretched thin, priorities are inverted in plain sight. The state appears more capable of accommodating illegality than defending continuity. That perception matters, because legitimacy rests on it. A government's first duty is not to sound compassionate. It is to protect the people it governs. When that duty is treated as secondary, trust collapses. When consent is bypassed, anger follows. When risk is dismissed rather than managed, events eventually do the correcting. The public is not asking for panic, but for seriousness – to know whether those in charge have weighed the risks honestly or are simply gambling that nothing goes wrong on their watch. History is unforgiving to governments that mistake hope for planning. When such policies fail, the cost is not paid by ministers or lawyers, but borne locally, suddenly, and without appeal. That is why scrutiny is needed now, not after warnings become headlines.

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

He was literally about to pounce. Please, EVERYONE, especially women, BE CAREFUL of your surroundings.

Listen carefully to the final statement in this chilling video, "Once the Digital ID is in place, it's game over for humanity" The government psyops haven't really kicked in yet. So before they program the public with ludicrous excuses for Digital ID (and before they brand you far-right for opposing it) speak up now. @OracleFilmsUK #DigitalID

The State of the World Distortion of reality by tightly controlled media and highly censored social media, and by actor-politicians has became so intense that many have disconnected from reality on many dimensions. Democracy has long been dysfunctional, with manipulation of electoral results and control of candidates for election making a mockery of democratic processes, and the roles of unelected officials coming to dominate those of the elected ones. In this environment, vast and completely fabricated narratives have been successfully launched upon unsuspecting populations: 1. With respect to covid, there was no pandemic. 2. With respect to climate change, the carbon dioxide output of humans is irrelevant. 3. With respect to central banking, your money is being stolen by currency debasement. 4. With respect to immigration, the flood of "refugees" is really a planned importation of people chosen to extinguish local culture and mores. 5. With respect to all publicised wars, the causes and motives are misrepresented, and the interests they serve obscured. 6. With respect to trans rights, trans people have degenerate cognition, not legitimate knowledge of what it is like to be the other gender. It does not matter whether this situation reflects planning on the part of a shadowy elite, or is emergent from the decline of your civilization. No matter whom you vote for, or what gloss your preferred candidate puts on these issues, nothing will change until you and enough of the people around you wake up to reality, and launch a campaign of consistent non-compliance with the antihuman trajectory that manipulative elites have set us upon. It does not matter whether you label the centralizing ambitions of those elites as socialism, communism, technocracy, gobalism or fascism. The important thing about centralisation is that it absolutely requires censorship and comprehensive obliteration of rights and freedoms to persist, and that it is wholly incompatible with the flourishing of human beings.

You lot ok with gangs carrying these on our streets and getting suspended sentences?? Then take 30 seconds to help us make a change and get 5 year mandatory sentences, instead of lenient judges making it worse out there. Please - ✍🏽 petition.parliament.uk/petitions/7024…

I hear more about Eid than Easter I hear more about Ramadan than Lent In fact, I hear more about Islam than I do about almost anything else these days. This 'push' to 'accept' Islam in The West feels more like a threat than an invitation to many Europeans Not because they are bigots. But because perhaps they have logical reasons to be 'Islamophobic' Followers of Islam have blown up the tube, slaughtered concert goers, stabbed their little children, groomed and raped their girls and persecute and massacre non-believers in Islamic states abroad. It is surely not irrational to be terrified of a religion whose Holy Book talks of destroying all over faiths and creating a global caliphate. Whose adherents do not accord rights to women. Yet Europeans are being gaslit that their fears are instead ignorance and hatred. Culturally, Islam is at odds with Western European morals and mores. It is inbuilt in humanity to protect the tribe, and fear strangers. All of the above does not constitute hate speech. It is simply a list of facts. An inconvenient list of facts for people who irrationally will them not to exist and will do anything to cover them up.

The collective shitting of pants following JD Vance’s speech, tragic posturing by European leaders, hysterical media response, the writhing of the liberal intelligentsia and talking heads, should all warm the souls of anyone who truly cares about Europe, its countries, peoples and democracies. What has he said that isn’t true, indeed palpably obvious to anyone not still hypnotised by the media or trapped by their own biases and dogmas? You can smell the fear. They know our numbers are growing at an astonishing speed, we’ve had enough, and there’s nothing that’s going to stop the rise of Western people. It’s the beginning of the end for the destructive hegemony that has debased our societies for so long, the pendulum has swung, the worm has turned, and I for one rejoice. There’s a long way to go, there will be bumps in the road, and no doubt a few manufactured crises to deal with in the coming months and years, but we now have more than vain hope.

Great speech by VP @JDVance!

If ... and "if" must do the heavy lifting here ... the truth of the plandemic came out, we would be in house of cards territory. That the huge profits in jabs were made possible by indemnity for their makers is only the tip of it. It was and is the great reset to cage us and empower others.

Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education @craigkellyAFEE

2 years ago

He needs to go to jail. Any politician that is found to have violated human rights and the Nuremberg Code, by mandating the covid vaccines for "political reasons" needs to spend several years in jail for mass reckless & negligent manslaughter. Do you agree ?

356 1K 5K 225K 153

Visual Intro to Professor John Searl's Law of Squares. John Searl had 6 years of reoccurring dreams from ages 6 to 12. Two dreams, twice a year, for 6 years while he was living at an orphanage. Abandoned multiple times. Beaten until he was mostly deaf and left to himself. So he thought and thought.... and dreamt bigger than anyone else. This lead him to write almost 100 booklets in sets he called the Law of Squares. This deals with everything from atomic energy, medical science, electrical engineering, philosophy... and much more. Share my page for a return to old school science and physics from some of the most controversial pioneers of exotic technologies.

Since TikTok is going to be "banned", I've saved a bunch of my videos on the magnetic experiments, challenges to scientific models and John Searl related content. I started a Rumble and TikTok page because YouTube deleted my channels of 16 years. As well as Facebook deleting my page of 15 years. Here we go again. lol Here's a quick visual intro to Professor John Searl's work

THE EARTHING MOVIE: REMARKABLE SCIENCE OF GROUNDING Documentary Connecting your feet to the ground causes your body to be filled with the Earth's electrons. There are many health benefits. We are electrical beings.

£11.6 billion in overseas climate aid, £5.4 billion on illegal migrant costs, £726 million in universal credit for refugees, £500 million for foreign farmers, billions squandered away in foreign aid - these are simply ludicrous amounts of money. Look around your town, your city, your community - just think how that money would transform the lives of millions of Brits. THEY should be our priority. Our country is failing. It is being pulled apart, distorted out of recognition by uncontrolled mass immigration. Yet our establishment sees it fit to spend this colossal amount of OUR money in this way? It's so wrong. We've got British pensioners, who have paid into the system their entire lives, freezing in their own homes. At the same time, illegal migrants are cared for in warm and cosy hotel rooms. What the hell are we playing at?! There is no other way of putting this - WE CAN'T AFFORD IT. We're slapping even more debt on the nation's credit card for our grandchildren to pay off the interest, all for what? To fund Rwandan farmers? I couldn't care less. We need a Government that puts the interests of the British people above ALL else. Every other issue in the world is secondary to that. To be brutally honest, it's not our problem. We've got enough of them at home. I'd far rather my tax was spent on dealing with the mess we've got here. I suspect the vast majority of Brits agree with me.

NET ZERO - I want to be clear: I am not against advancement in energy technologies. Humanity should always develop and progress. What I oppose is bankrupting the country by gambling taxpayers’ money on the emperor’s new clothes. Because that’s what these experimental technologies are currently. The misinformation being fed to the public is a disgrace. Technologies like carbon capture, flywheels, and large-scale battery storage are being sold to us as the future and that we can lead the world! I don’t want to gamble with my tax thanks. The only thing we will lead the world in, is being the first country to bankrupt itself on the alter of Net zero and they haven’t even given us a choice! These experimental technologies will cost not £ billions but £ TRILLIONS and provide little benefit to the average citizen, they simply benefit global corporations and those with vested interests. The government should have focused on upgrading the national grid as a first step. At the very least it would enable us to use the renewable energy we are creating currently, rather than paying £ billions in subsidies for providers not to supply. Instead, we’re rushing headlong into experimental technologies that are still in test phase. We are investing in these theoretical technologies before we can even observe their real world performance, evaluate value for money, or knowing if practically they will even work! And let’s face it, installations of both fly wheels and carbon capture machines have both failed financially or practically worldwide. The hypocrisy around emissions and claims that these new technologies are “cleaner and greener” is an outrageous lie. Whether deliberate or misguided, this misinformation is unacceptable. The British public deserves open-book transparency on costs, timelines, and actual impacts. If the government cannot provide this, they must step aside and bring in independent teams—free from vested interests—to evaluate and advise. And then the British public should be offered a vote. The ideological, socialist pipe dream of hitting a fictitious 2030 target will bankrupt the country. Worse, it will make us entirely dependent on banks and foreign entities that will dictate our policies for decades. And we are doing all of this whilst we have at least 200 years of domestic energy resources in the ground, the ‘emergency’ propaganda is simply untrue. But instead of bringing energy prices down in order to enable growth, which in turn would generate GDP, which in turn frees up domestic funds to invest in research, we’re sacrificing our economic stability and sovereignty for technology that will be outdated before we’ve even finished building it!.. because technology works like that! Some people are getting very rich, some people are gaining global attention and others are simply fools. It is unacceptable to me.

NET ZERO - Ed’s going to bankrupt us. Premier of Alberta, explains battery storage cost, to store renewable energy. $12 BILLION Per 1 Hour & Alberta’s population is 4.4 million! The UK population is 70 million. You do the maths 💣