bingetrading @bingetrading

very simple explanation as to why this will continue to happen & why this will obviously proliferate to movies too. capitalism esp when paired w/ very sophisticated tech like feeds + ai optimizes for elimination of friction at all costs. tiktok/reels have almost entirely eliminated three primary forms of friction: 1) discovery friction, you literally don't have to decide what to watch 2) time friction where gratification arrives in seconds 3) relevance friction. this is the most critical. since the pool of content is much larger & the algorithm on top is much more sophisticated it is continuously more adapted to your current emotional state, prefs, & behavior like nothing else. netflix cannot remotely pull any of this off even if they have a really great recommendation system. & more specifically the creators on these platforms have gotten much better (the production values of creator content is through the roof & it often feels very professional, just look at some of the pods on here for example). also there is a huge clipping phenomenon that is leveraged by creators for both commentary & showcasing what's actually worth watching in both streams (clavicular) & regular tv shows too. e.g. i watch almost all sports highlights through this creator on tiktok (his name is gavin something). he is awesome. most ppl used to reach for netflix when they door dashed, now it's much much easier to just open tiktok/reels.

John Arnold @johnarnold

10 hours ago

People are losing the attention span to even watch 30 minute TV shows as short form video eats the world.

218 190 2K 564K 319

"It's more about can you trade it than it is about can you understand it." @nellyeeee joins the Insilico Terminal Podcast to talk about scalping Bitcoin with a VWAP rotational system and going from zero perp trades to trading it full-time in a year and a half. We covered how Asia and New York trade differently, failed continuation, sizing into trades that are going against him, market orders and fees, and why he thinks anyone willing to put in the reps can do it. 00:00 Intro and going from on-chain to perps 09:22 Building a VWAP system around Bitcoin 15:27 Sticking with it until it clicked 22:26 How Asia and New York trade differently 30:07 Failed continuation, wide stops and trend days 41:23 Early mistakes and getting the timing right 49:20 Work-life balance and the London session 58:37 Weekends and the Sunday futures open 01:02:10 Execution, fees and scaling into size 01:11:22 Final advice on hard work and reps

Eight years at #1. Fifteen straight in the top ten. Then one massive loss ends it all. Meet The Dark Lord: a mysterious prop trading legend. churningandburning.com/2026/10/churni…

holy f*ck, elon musk's team at spacexai just put 146 grok bots online, and you can download all of them for free they run your inbox, chase invoices, call customers, and one runs your vacuum from chat. each installs in one click. 56 official jobs on the use cases page 90 bots in the marketplace bots like these usually sell for $50-200 each. here they cost $0. how to install: 1. open the use cases page or the marketplace 2. pick a bot by the job you want done 3. hit add, it lands in your grok bot 4. send it the first task in chat use cases: x.ai/bot/use-cases marketplace: x.ai/bot/marketplace save this ↓

unicode @unicodef1wn

2 days ago

I put together one guide for anyone who wants a workflow like the SpaceXSI team's. One message builds your whole Grok Bot setup. Plus the team's rules, prompt habits, routines and permissions. Every setup is a block you paste. 16-min read. Save it ↓ x.com/i/article/2112…

42 26 299 447K 800

anthropic and openai have completely opposite compute strategies anthropic buys from everyone. $111b with google for TPUs, $110b with amazon for trainium, $31b with microsoft, and ~$135b with neoclouds like spacex, nscale, lambda, and volta openai bet on doing compute itself. $300b with oracle for stargate, $250b with microsoft, and its own stargate campuses in texas, ohio, and georgia anthropic signed roughly 3x more neocloud capacity than openai, and around two thirds of its commitments are on non-nvidia chips

Jessie Dong @jessiedong_

2 days ago

anthropic is locked into $450 billion of compute. it has to pay whether it uses it or not anthropic's revenue is about $70 billion a year. roughly (though contracts change price every year), it's $45 billion a year for a decade. that's most of what they make a year today the

15 24 176 124K 98

Last month, we demonstrated high-rate alchemy: turning mercury into real, stable gold, beating CERN’s record by a factor of 10. Last week, we enriched isotopes in the world’s most powerful plasma centrifuge, beating the Soviet record that stood for 40 years. Now, we’re building a fusion reactor in San Francisco to achieve record power density.

RIP to cancer we literally just had a cancer drug that could eliminate surgery, radiation and chemo get FDA approved the drug is dostarlimab, an immunotherapy for one genetic subtype of rectal cancer in the trial, 47% of evaluable patients had no detectable tumor a year after treatment (independent review) colorectal is one of the top cancer killers of men under 50 the acceleration in frontier bio in 2026 is genuinely mindblowing bio/acc

Superpower @superpower

2 days ago

BREAKING: The FDA just granted accelerated approval to the first immunotherapy for a leading cause of cancer death in U.S. men under 50. This therapy allows certain patients to skip radiation, chemo, and surgery altogether.

44 495 4K 1.6M 1K

This is crazy. Short sales have outpaced long buying by a staggering 5:1 month-to-date, pushing short leverage close to five-year highs. We have 44% of all earnings next week including loads of tech companies. If the Nasdaq can hold the range into earnings and we see some surprises, that's a monster amount of fuel for a squeeze.

The top sector that crypto billionaires & successful founders are investing in after Ai is biotech/longevity. • @cz_binance Yzi Labs put ~10% of $10B fund in biotech • @brian_armstrong co-founded the longevity startup Newlimit now worth $3.1B • @VitalikButerin open source bio funds have contributed $400M+ Alex Colville explains why: "The amount of funding that's been put into this field is still tiny. If you look at the amount of investment into this field compared to Ai, you wouldn't even see it on a bar chart." "We are in the earliest innings."

Luke Martin @VentureCoinist

a day ago

A conversation with Dr. Alex Colville (@AlexJColville), co-founder and GP of Age1, the first longevity fund. He studied the biology of aging for his PhD in Genetics at Stanford and has deployed more than $100M into longevity and biotech. We discuss how Anthropic & OpenAi are

21 23 104 29K 84

I spend a lot of time, perhaps too much, thinking about the lost architecture of Britain. Crystal Palace was the most tremendous loss of the modern era, yet it's rare to see any pictures of it. When built in 1851, it was the largest building in the world and three times the size of St Paul's Cathedral. What's more, that immense ironwork and 293,000 glass panels went up in just 190 days for the World's Fair. Almost 1 million square feet of glass. An extraordinary feat. It was razed in a fire in the 1930s and never rebuilt.

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

Level 4 (1M–10M) really is the no-man's-land of wealth. For example, going from $100k to $300k can change your life. You can quit a job, move somewhere else, or take a chance on something of your own. Going from $5M to $5.2M? You're richer, but you don't notice the increase anymore in the same way. This is where the diminishing returns start to show. Back in 2021, when I went from $500k to $1m, I felt like on top of the world. It was a big change for me. A little backstory: in Feb 2021, I quit my 9-5 job with $500k NW, and it felt like a huge achievement. I knew it wasn’t enough to live off forever, but it was enough to dare to bet on myself. During the years after 21’ there have been periods where my NW has increased a lot, and periods where it went a bit down or barely went up at all. So I can very much relate to what Nick says: at some point, you could “work” twice as hard and barely notice the difference in your life. Your portfolio grows. But the extra money buys you less, while the time it costs you stays the same. This is where I think a lot of people in crypto get stuck. You know how to make money. But unless you increase the risk, your NW will only go up linearly. Because you might have to risk money you no longer want to lose. So you end up in the middle, the 7-figure hell (no man's land). Imagine spending another year glued to crypto to make an extra $200k on a $5M portfolio (4% increase). Don’t misunderstand me, that’s a lot of money, but many people don’t want to risk the big gains they’ve already earned, and since they don’t, their NW will barely move, and they’re forever trapped in the 7-fig hell.

Nick Maggiulli @dollarsanddata

3 days ago

This is why I say that Level 4 ($1M-$10M) is the no man's land of wealth. At some point you could work twice as hard and it barely makes a dent.

103 52 1K 719K 912

We dont have to be in 1998. But it sure as hell would look smth like this if it was. We have not seen one real pullback until the pullback that started in July. Exposure levels went from max to 5 to 10y lows for hedgefunds, funds blew up, retail in Korea blew up... Maybe we just went up and went straight into the crash, but with 2% adoption and GPU prices still moving higher, I am not sure we are done.

Most employees have no idea about the games executives play behind closed doors. At my last company, I was one of the highest revenue producers in its history. Even though I was an individual contributor, they thought highly of me, and I was invited to a good number of management summits only a few years into my career. At one of those summits, I was introduced to our Director of Strategic Accounts. Let's call him "Mike." Mike had a big job. He oversaw growth for all of our enterprise accounts, which were our main moneymakers. He had a good relationship with the executive team at the time, and while he was good at his job, he was extremely political. After day 1 of the summit, we were at a country club for dinner. Mike had everyone at the table sign the back of a menu. The President and CEO were laughing as it went around. Eventually I signed it, confused. I didn't know Mike well, but I knew the President liked me, so I asked him what it was about. Turns out Mike had a game. He'd have everyone sign the menu, keep it, and pull it out the next year to compare signatures and see who stuck around, who left, and who was new. That told me everything I needed to know about how that leadership team saw its people.

If BTC is going to do what I think it is about to do, I think you can start thinking about an aggressively managed trend trading strategy where for a little while you can buy 3-5% dips safely before a larger 6-8% dip and towards the latter faster moving stages this will increase to 10-15% before eventually a full leverage reset happens with a 20-30%+ correction I think we have had buyers since the bottom and from here on out who accumulate(d) price agnostically, because they have to do something with their balance sheet to diversify their risk, whilst everyone knows equities are becoming increasingly harder to squeeze higher, gold is performing poorly and treasuries are in tough spot. Bitcoin is about to click for a new tranche of investors and JPM just signalled to the world they think it will be the best performing asset class for 2027. Not coincidentally we saw the largest daily ETF inflow of the year, on Monday. Whilst everyone was talking about Black Monday. This pattern has occurred in various forms during multiple starts of bull runs where price moves strongly, consolidates, moves higher but struggles to really get going, whilst respecting the earlier consolidation as support. This is typical disbelief. It was also visible in the 62-65 region where it was basically refusing to sweep liquidity and then moved higher and I believe the same is happening right here BTC has once again had every reason to go lower over the last weeks and refused to do so Buckle up, I could be wrong, but fuck me and take a little gamble I fully expect a little more chop next days and the strong alts to gear up leading the charge into November and December

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

Before stepping into the ring, Cus D’Amato would repeat to Mike Tyson that you don’t exist, only the task exists. The moment you internalize what this really means, all self-doubt simply ceases to exist, because there’s no longer a self to doubt. What’s left is total immersion in the task, which is what the flow state actually is, where there’s no “you” left to interfere, and action arises by itself, like second nature, faster than conscious thought, through the sheer genius of your unconscious mind.

Iain MacMillan @IainMacBets

3 days ago

No exaggeration, this guy might be the best interview in pro sports right now

925 5K 81K 9.0M 21K

This pill is just a different way of delivering minoxidil. Basically, it uses extended-release formulation to keep minoxidil circulating longer therefore stimulating hair follicles. Unlike finasteride/dutasteride, it doesn't suppress DHT. Frankly, the phase 3 results are impressive: In 536 men who took the pill 2x/day, it increased hair counts by 36.4hairs/cm2 in 6 months compared with just 6.6 for placebo. About 69% of them reported improved or much improved hair coverage vs. 15% on placebo. There were no serious side-effects apart from some fluid retention and unwanted hair growth. With that being said, if longer-term studies confirm its safety profile -- having a non-hormonal oral alternative is awesome.

Polymarket @Polymarket

3 days ago

JUST IN: Veradermics announces its experimental hair-loss pill significantly increased hair growth in over 500 men, with no serious side effects reported in a late-stage study.

396 629 17K 6.6M 7K

Slow and then all at once. Exponential adoption and now the top pick at JPM. $BTC forecasted to return 10% irr over the next decade vs a maximum of 7.7% via small caps. More than the target, seeing these banks adopt and build new products, at a multi-b scale (latest yesterday by JPM), seemed like an impossible dream even 1-2y ago. From no exposure, fighting against clarity, to adopting, building and now presenting as the top pick.

Matt Hougan @Matt_Hougan

3 days ago

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight at you, then they add you to their Long-Term Capital Markets Assumptions paper and predict you'll be the best-performing asset of the next decade.

191 932 5K 454K 1K

SpaceX key charts: Revenue, EBITDA and CapEX

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

zerohedge @zerohedge

2 days ago

SpaceX Jumps On Blowout Quarter As AI Sends Revenue, EBITDA Soaring zerohedge.com/markets/spacex…

17 31 255 118K 16

If the key is data centres And data centres are most efficient in space And spacex has 90% of GLOBAL mass to orbit ….. interesting huh

Jo Bhakdi @JOBhakdi

2 days ago

This is the most insane and most insanely bullish earnings call I have ever listened to. SPCX is basically saying they are going to take over the world from Space, within the next 12-24 months. Stock is up a meager 4.5% after hours. I love this stuff - that's why we need

152 120 2K 108K 145

the moves to get from 0 to $1m are different from $1m to $5m, $5m to $25m, etc. the amount of free education on this app is a blessing

Evanss6 @Evan_ss6

2 days ago

Once you sustain $5-10m net worth, you've made it. Almost. Rich enough to be comfortable, poor enough for one bad bet to send you back. Here's what actually changes at this tier, and how to get to $25m 👇 -Self-funding, barely. A 3% draw on $7.5m is $225k/yr pre-tax, ~$150k

101 120 3K 967K 5K