FlowCrypt @FlowCrypt

flowcrypt.com Prague Joined October 2011

Tweets

271
Followers

386
Following

33
Likes

107

FlowCrypt @FlowCrypt

5 years ago

@hammyhavoc Sorry for the trouble - could you send us a screenshot either here or at [email protected]?

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

@hammyhavoc Thanks for the feedback. Once we roll out proper support for Rich Text (for now only supported experimentally on Firefox), we'll also make sure to attach the signature in rich text form, including links.

0 0 1 0 0

View Details

FlowCrypt @FlowCrypt

5 years ago

@hammyhavoc @Facebook @gpg4win Facebook probably cannot process ECC keys, which FlowCrypt uses by default. You can try switching to RSA key during setup.

0 0 1 0 0

View Details

FlowCrypt @FlowCrypt

5 years ago

@hammyhavoc Sorry for the eyesore - you can collapse the Gmail side menu which will produce a smaller button. We'll also make the button somewhat smaller when the menu is not collapsed. github.com/FlowCrypt/flow…

0 0 1 0 0

View Details

FlowCrypt @FlowCrypt

6 years ago

@christiangruber We had it available for almost a year, and then took it down while we continue working on it. In 2-3 months it will be available again on the beta channel.

1 0 1 0 0

View Details

FlowCrypt @FlowCrypt

7 years ago

FlowCrypt for iOS (beta) will be available in a few weeks. Leave your email at flowcrypt.com/download to get notified.

1 1 3 0 0

View Details

FlowCrypt @FlowCrypt

6 years ago

@MarkCruise Hello, we will to re-enable the beta over the coming months and keep it available from then on. By the end of the year, we will be doing a public release.

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

FlowCrypt @FlowCrypt

6 years ago

@mailvelope @grmfb We've been trying to find another way, but it results in degradation of UX during upgrades. Still, I hope eventually we can drop using the tabs API and that will remove that permission from the prompt.

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

FlowCrypt @FlowCrypt

6 years ago

@mailvelope @grmfb On our end the issue is that browser bundles together unrelated permissions. FlowCrypt needs to be able to run script in currently active window - particularly during extension updates, and for that it uses chrome.tabs API. But that gets translated to user as "read history".

1 0 0 0 0

View Details

FlowCrypt @FlowCrypt

6 years ago

@imSatyamKapoor Thank you! We expect many improvements in the Android app this year in speed, stability and usability. If you run into anything in the meanwhile, let us know.

0 0 1 0 0

View Details

FlowCrypt @FlowCrypt

6 years ago

@crablabuk If you run into issues, let us know.

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

FlowCrypt @FlowCrypt

6 years ago

@_neerajpal @WhatsApp Possible. Glad you got it working!

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

FlowCrypt @FlowCrypt

6 years ago

FlowCrypt just published our first public #BugBounty program! Check out our blog for more info flowcrypt.com/blog/article/2…

2 3 3 0 0

View Details

FlowCrypt @FlowCrypt

7 years ago

@taoeffect @okTurtles Thanks! Been so busy here that I forgot to check our Twitter & thank you earlier.

0 0 1 0 0

View Details

FlowCrypt @FlowCrypt

7 years ago

@_klausi_ Thank you for the kind words!

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

FlowCrypt @FlowCrypt

7 years ago

@Shripriya Great to hear!

0 0 1 0 0

View Details

FlowCrypt @FlowCrypt

7 years ago

@Secopsgeek Hello, thanks! To be more precise - the code is proprietary, but it's publicly available at github.com/FlowCrypt/ . More appropriately called "Source Available" rather than "Open Source".

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

FlowCrypt @FlowCrypt

7 years ago

@ninoseki You can remove it, then approve again from FlowCrypt (may need to reinstall). New FlowCrypt versions are verified by Google. It will no longer show.

1 0 1 0 0

View Details

FlowCrypt @FlowCrypt

7 years ago

@sibusisosishi @marengz @LastPass Fundamentally though, you don't want to worry about the exact numbers. You just want it to show "millennia" instead of "hours", so that if we missed by a factor of 100, it's still fine.

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

FlowCrypt @FlowCrypt

7 years ago

@sibusisosishi @marengz @LastPass I'm no longer sure. We were assuming the attacker would not actually pay for the computational power, but rather rent a botnet (which are conveniently sold in multiples of 10k).