hamdy @hamdyh

The more you read about Khaldoon Al Mubarak, the more you realise he can’t carry on as City chairman if PL is to maintain integrity Wholly unsurprising that he tried this - and yet still shocking that he did - via @FT This is why nation states can’t own football clubs

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

@FabrizioRomano Interested to understand why you claimed (when the 114 story broke) that you only do transfer related updates. However since then you have taken to posting several times seemingly on the side of City’s perspective. Are you on the payroll at all?

🚨LIVE FOOTAGE: IDF soldiers threaten to assault and kill a brave Palestinian journalist This is who they are. Show the entire world.

When it was Qatar 2022 BBC, Sky News and ITV News were doing segments for 40 days and 40 nights about human rights abuse and campaigning for alcohol to be allowed during the World Cup. But USA is refusing to allow a referee and Iran’s team in and they’ve gone quiet. Cowards

Israel is the first state which has a death penalty for one race but not another since Nazi Germany

Imagine if instead of spending $1.3 million/minute on war in Iran, we spent this on people. With 3 days of war, we could eliminate the worst form of global hunger, saving 1.5m kids' lives. With less than 3 weeks worth, we could offer national pre-K or college for all Americans.

AF Post @AFpost

7 months ago

State Sec. Rubio: “Imagine if instead of spending billions on weapons, Iran spent that money on its people. They’d have a much different country.” Follow: @AFpost

13K 2K 21K 11.8M 4K

Hind Rajab — 5 years old. Trapped in a car for 48 hours, surrounded by Israeli tanks, begging for help. They executed her with 350 bullets and killed five members of her family. This is a war crime against a child!

@ChannelNewsAsia are you going to post anything about this?

HatsOff @HatsOffff

7 months ago

Israeli soldiers tortured this 18-month-old baby in Gaza to force a confession out of his father during an interrogation

1K 21K 47K 14.6M 6K

Iran has a right to exist. Also, they warned they would strike which I have been reliably informed makes them the most moral army in the world. Lastly, the children harmed were used as human shields. Did I miss anything?

Israel Foreign Ministry @IsraelMFA

7 months ago

The Iranian regime devastated Arad and Dimona by deliberately striking civilians with missiles. Over 100 people were injured, including children. A blatant war crime. Pure terrorism.

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

23K 2K 12K 9.5M 1K

Mohamed Salah’s goal against Wolves was his 254th in a Liverpool shirt. Wayne Rooney, Manchester United’s all-time top scorer, scored 253 goals for the Old Trafford outfit.

This is just absolute, unequivocal bullshit. The IAEA says this is a lie. The UN says its a lie. The US intelligence community can't back up this assertion, nor can the Israelis. This is as bad as claims that Iraq had WMDs if not worse.

Aaron Rupar @atrupar

8 months ago

Trump: "If we didn't hit within 2 weeks, they would've had a nuclear weapon. When crazy people have nuclear weapons bad things happen."

3K 741 3K 3.0M 670

Heard of the Iranian Navy Ship and what really happened in the Indian Ocean? So, India invited Iran to participate In MILAN 2026, Iran honored this invitation and sent 200 sailors. They were still there when the war broke out between Iran and US/Israel It was returning from India with over 200 sailors on board when India tipped the United States that Iran was in their backyard, moment later the U.S navy arrived and sank it with several torpedos in the Indian Ocean. More than 80 sailors have been confirmed dead with over 120 still Unaccounted for. This is a betrayal of the highest order.

Muslims always gets the stereotypical terrorist bomber jokes just because of 9/11, yet Americans can bomb countries every year but somehow they're not the terrorists? Somehow they're not the monsters? Okay.

Spain’s MEP, Irene Montero: “They say Iran has nuclear weapons — sounds like what they said about Iraq.” “But it is Israel that has nuclear weapons.” “The U.S. is the only country to ever drop a nuclear bomb.” “Today, Israel and the U.S. are the greatest threat to humanity.”

Imagine if Iran bombed Washington and killed students in schools, what would you call it? Terrorists The U.S. and Israel bombed Tehran and killed students in schools. Why do you call it a "pre-emptive strike"? Bombing a school is a war crime under international humanitarian law

If you want to understand why the US and Israel are attacking and attempting to subjugate Iran, you must read this historic speech by Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi, delivered earlier this month at the 16th Al Jazeera Forum held in Doha: “Excellencies, Distinguished colleagues, Ladies and gentlemen, السلام علیکم It is a privilege to address you at this distinguished forum and discuss the profound question of our region: Palestine. Let me begin with a fact that the region has learned through decades of painful experience, and that the world is learning again at a terrible human cost: ‘Palestine is not one issue among many’. Palestine is the defining question of justice in West Asia and beyond. It is the strategic and moral compass of our region. It is a test of whether international law has meaning, whether human rights have universal value, and whether global institutions exist to protect the weak — or merely to rationalise the power of the strong. For generations, the Palestinian crisis was understood primarily as the consequence of an illegal occupation and the denial of an inalienable right: the right of a people to self-determination. But today, we must recognise that the crisis has moved far beyond the parameters of occupation alone. What we are witnessing in Gaza is not merely war. It is not a ‘conflict’ between equal parties. It is not an unfortunate byproduct of security measures. It is the deliberate destruction of civilian life on a massive scale. It is genocide. The human cost of Israel’s atrocities in Gaza has wounded the conscience of humanity. It has torn open the heart of the Muslim world — and it has also shaken millions beyond it: Christians, Jews, and people of all faiths, who still believe that the life of a child is not a bargaining chip, that starvation is not a weapon, that hospitals are not battlefields, and that the killing of families is not self-defense. Palestine today is not simply a tragedy; it is a mirror held up to the world. It reflects not only the suffering of Palestinians, but also the moral failure of those who had the power to stop this catastrophe — and chose instead to justify it, enable it, or normalise it. But Palestine and Gaza is not only a humanitarian crisis. It has become the platform for something larger and more dangerous: an expansionist project pursued under the banner of ‘security’. This project has three consequences — each of them profound, each of them alarming: The first consequence is global. The Israeli regime’s conduct in Palestine, and the impunity granted to it, have deeply damaged the international legal order. We must say this clearly: the world is moving toward a condition where international law no longer is respected and governs international relations. What is perhaps most dangerous is the precedent being established: that if a state has sufficient political cover and protection, it may bomb civilians, besiege populations, target infrastructure, assassinate individuals across borders, and still demand to be regarded as lawful. This is not merely a Palestinian problem. It is a global problem. We are witnessing not only the tragedy of Palestine, but the transformation of the world into a place where the law is replaced by force. The second consequence is regional. Israel’s expansionist project has had a direct and destabilising impact on the security of all countries in the region. The Israeli regime now openly violates borders. It breaches sovereignties. It assassinates official dignitaries. It conducts terrorist operations. It expands its reach in multiple theatres. And it does so, not discreetly, but with a sense of entitlement — because it has learned that international accountability will not come. Let us be candid: if the Gaza issue is ‘settled’ through destruction and forced displacement — if that becomes the model — then the West Bank will be next. Annexation will become policy. This is the essence of what has long been called the ‘Greater Israel’ project. The question therefore is not whether Israel’s actions threaten Palestinians alone. The question is whether the region will accept a future in which borders are temporary, sovereignty is conditional, and security is determined not by law or diplomacy, but by the ambitions of a militarised occupier. The third consequence is structural — and perhaps the most dangerous. Israel’s expansionist project requires that neighboring countries be weakened — militarily, technologically, economically, and socially — so that the Israeli regime permanently enjoys the upper hand. Under this project, Israel is free to expand its military arsenal without limits, including weapons of mass destruction that remain outside any inspection regime. Yet other countries are demanded to disarm. Others are pressured to reduce defensive capacity. Others are punished for scientific progress. Others are sanctioned for building resilience. Nobody should be confused: this is not arms control, it is not non-proliferation, it is not security. It is the enforcement of permanent inequality: Israel must have a ‘military, intelligence and strategic edge’, and others must remain vulnerable. This is a doctrine of domination. Ladies and gentlemen, This is why the Palestinian question is not only a humanitarian issue. It is a strategic issue. It is not only about Gaza and the West Bank. It is about the future of our region and the rules of the world. So what must be done? It is not enough to express concern. It is not enough to issue statements. It is not enough to mourn. We need a coordinated strategy of action — legal, diplomatic, economic, and security-based — rooted in the principles of international law and collective responsibility. First, the international community must support legal mechanisms without hesitation. Second, there must be consequences for violations. We call for comprehensive and targeted sanctions against Israel, including: an immediate arms embargo, the suspension of military and intelligence cooperation, restrictions on officials, and banning trade. Third, we need a credible political horizon grounded in law. The international community must affirm: the end of occupation, the right of return and compensation in accordance with international law, and the establishment of a unified and independent Palestinian state with Al-Quds Al-Sharif as its capital. Fourth, the humanitarian crisis must be treated as a matter of urgent international responsibility. Collective punishment must never be normalised. Fifth, regional states must coordinate to protect sovereignty and deter aggression. The principle must be clear: security cannot be built on the insecurity of others. And finally, the Islamic world, the Arab world, and the nations of the Global South must build a united diplomatic front. The Organization of Islamic Cooperation, the Arab League, and regional organisations must move beyond symbolism toward coordinated action: legal support, diplomatic initiatives, economic measures, and strategic messaging. This is not about confrontation. It is about preventing the region from being reshaped by force. Dear colleagues, Let no one miscalculate: a region cannot be kept stable by allowing one actor to act above the law. The doctrine of impunity will not produce peace; it will produce wider conflict. The path to stability is clear: justice for Palestine, accountability for crimes, an end to occupation and apartheid, and a regional order built on sovereignty, equality, and cooperation. If the world wants peace, it must stop rewarding aggression. If the world wants stability, it must stop enabling expansionism. If the world believes in international law, it must enforce it — consistently and without double standards. And if the nations of this region seek a future free from perpetual war, they must recognise this fundamental truth: Palestine is not merely a cause for solidarity; it is the indispensable cornerstone of regional security. Thank you”.

Charlie Kirk shot dead? Here is a list of 230 journalists murdered by Israel in Gaza who Charlie supported

It's hard to disagree