Ami Ardent @101seriously101

Joined October 2023

Tweets

669
Followers

43
Following

231
Likes

5K

Ami Ardent @101seriously101

27 minutes ago

@eileenlandi @JackPosobiec Her parents have a GoFundMe for “housing and expenses” of their own (it’s a violation to have one for legal expenses) but we all know where it’s being used, they just can’t say that on the page.

0 0 1 8 0

View Details

Ami Ardent @101seriously101

2 days ago

@LangmanVince She’s beautiful, congratulations to her for getting her 💰💰💰

0 0 1 45 0

View Details

Mike Bales 🫡🇺🇸 @MikeBales

6 days ago

88 3K 15K 89K 142

View Details

Charlie Kirk @charliekirk11

14 years ago

Good men must die, but death can't kill their names.

2K 45K 184K 0 8K

View Details

Ami Ardent @101seriously101

a week ago

@brosdave1 @Dianna143327 Matt Rife is the comedian

4 1 7 177 0

View Details

Matt Van Swol @mattvanswol

a week ago

I’ve watched this probably 100 times at this point. This one quote by this one juror is radicalizing me in ways I didn’t know were even possible: “He had the hardest time getting off the fact that Lindsay viciously k*lled her children…” I don’t know where we go from here…

3K 11K 64K 1.7M 4K

View Details

Ami Ardent @101seriously101

a week ago

@Kecojazo @carsonkrow This is what I’ve been wondering. She didn’t even try to resist the “Voice” about her babies. But she hesitated on herself. As a nurse she would know how to do it quickly and correctly.

0 0 3 161 0

View Details

Ami Ardent @101seriously101

2 weeks ago

@alisa_childers I’ve wondered this same thing. If they were playing at the park with their children and she came up and murdered them, would they still agree with her and think she was hearing voices and feel sympathy for her?

0 0 1 656 0

View Details

Ami Ardent @101seriously101

2 weeks ago

@RobWeirdicht @mickitiki She had a TON of conviction in her when the “voice” told her to kill her babies, yet hesitant to slit her own wrists and throat. 🤔 You’d think if the “voice” had told her she’d have done it, no hesitation and as a nurse she knows how to do it quickly.

0 0 0 104 0

View Details

Ami Ardent @101seriously101

2 weeks ago

@NKromchenk4068 She would take meds a couple times and decide she didn’t like them. Meds take 6 weeks to work and all meds are going to have side effects.

0 0 0 17 0

View Details

Ami Ardent @101seriously101

2 weeks ago

@TheFSoF @LangmanVince He did do his job… til he threw tantrum after tantrum. But the Prosecution was also awful.

1 0 1 15 0

View Details

Ami Ardent @101seriously101

2 weeks ago

@Tinkerbell52028 @nicksortor She never fully committed to slitting her wrists and throat as you can tell by the “hesitation marks” - had a voice been commanding her, she had zero hesitation when it came to murdering her children. Her cuts barely needed stitches and as a nurse would have known how to do it.

0 0 1 12 0

View Details

Ami Ardent @101seriously101

2 weeks ago

@Tinkerbell52028 @nicksortor She definitely was not. I watche the trial. I went in with knowing she killed those babies but I kept an open mind. After watching it those “voices” was her choosing to take her kids with her She didn’t hesitate for a moment when she murdered those babies but couldn’t kill hersel

1 0 1 42 0

View Details

Ami Ardent @101seriously101

2 weeks ago

@nicksortor It’s unfortunate that the Foreperson and the Defense told everyone it was 11 v 1. It would have been nice had they not known what the count was.

0 0 0 2 0

View Details

Ami Ardent @101seriously101

2 weeks ago

@MomAngtrades I believe we are a silent majority. It’s just those on the other side of the fence and just VERY loud.

0 0 0 2 0

View Details

Ami Ardent @101seriously101

2 weeks ago

@MattWalshBlog They’re misrepresenting him, he says he has doubt that doesn’t mean it’s beyond reasonable doubt. None of them were there and experienced it, none of them can be 100% certain. They should all have DOUBT He expressed his and now they’re saying he won’t follow the law is ridiculous

0 0 1 3K 0

View Details

❦GunLovinTrumpGirl🔫 @BeStillQueen

2 weeks ago

A juror has reasonable doubt. You don’t get to bully them into changing their mind or “replacing” them if they aren’t going your way. Seriously, what’s with this defense attorney?

82 123 1K 15K 5

View Details

Matt Walsh @MattWalshBlog

2 weeks ago

Clancy’s entire “insanity” defense rests completely on the claim that she “heard a voice” telling her to kill her kids. The problem is: 1) There’s no way to prove or disprove an imaginary voice. Any murderer can make this claim and if it counts as “reasonable doubt” then we can never convict anyone of anything ever again. 2) She never reported this voice before or since the crime, strongly indicating that she made it up. 3) Most importantly, even if she DID hear a voice, why didn’t she refuse to follow the command? If a voice told me to murder my children, I would refuse. If the voice threatened and harassed me, I’d still refuse. If an actual real human told me to kill my kids and put a gun to my head, I would still refuse. If this imaginary voice did appear, Clancy could have chosen not to obey it. Instead, by her telling, the voice spoke exactly one time and she just immediately complied with what it told her to do. Not even a moment of pushback. Even if I bought that bullshit, which I don’t, she would still be guilty as hell.