11 Dimensions Lab @11DimensionsLab

That's why i often like to get information about crypto projects from youtubers with 750 subscribers :)

Databot @databot_xyz

2 years ago

📚 Sunday Alpha #6: KOLs & Social Influence KOLs are key players in Web3. Whether they specialize in content creation, community leadership or entertainement, they shape narratives and influence the decisions of their audience. Here's what you need to know about crypto KOLs 👇

5 6 31 2K 1

I think your decision to focus on a smaller number of projects is a scientifically sound idea (the "Hedgehog Concept" from the book Good to Great at least suggests this). :) I constantly use your forecasts, and it seems like I'm starting to understand when to trust them more and when to trust them less. I'm talking about small projects. It feels like the forecasts become more "quantum" and questionable when trading volume drops. During these times, the predictions start swinging quickly between bullish and bearish directions. Lately, they have been freezing more often, and I have to refresh the page, but that doesn't always help. What could be causing this? Maybe it would be worth adding some kind of confirmation that the process is running? Perhaps a progress bar, from 0 to 100 percent (even approximately), so that it's clear whether the process is actually ongoing or if I should just refresh everything right away. By the way, for very small projects, the model often crashes completely and throws an error. Maybe it tries to predict a negative token price, realizes that's nonsense, and just stops? :)

Oh, I really wish LBB would find LBB-quality projects, not ones like this. This one looked interesting at first glance: 500+ followers on Twitter, 500+ TG members, but after reaching 400K, the developer pulled the entire rug and seemingly kicked everyone out of the Telegram group. What do you think—what parameters could the bot quickly and automatically check to filter out such projects from appearing on BB's radar? Or maybe in the future, if you create an AI model for your bot, you could train it to recognize such projects as undesirable? Overall, I’d like to have a bot mode that sends fewer notifications while ensuring that the ones I do receive are of very high value.

few understand

@AscendEX_ @LittleBirdieBot Some data about @AscendEX_: Global positions by @CoinGecko Monthly visits: 4.94M (39th place) 24h volume: 1,893,582,983$ (13th place) Trust score by @CoinGecko 7/10 (51st place) What do you think, @LittleBirdieBot ?

Given your situation of buying fewer tokens than intended, you could develop a model interesting both for you and long-term holders who believe in your project’s growth. In my view, the model should look something like this: Format 1: Holding a large number of tokens (in the future, 1 million tokens might be a very difficult figure to reach for the average user). Format 2: If possible, when granting monthly withdrawal access from a potential user’s wallet, then: 30% goes to your wallet, 70% is burned, or 30% goes to your wallet, 42% is burned, and 28% goes to development/marketing (even if that entire 28% ends up being your salary), or another percentage arrangement along these lines. This way, over time, you can accumulate your “share of the stock” in the long run, earn profit here and now, and maintain the motivation for long-term holders to keep holding tokens for years and throughout market cycles. Regarding the growth in your project’s market capitalization, I can imagine it reaching a market cap of 1B+ (a 5000x from the current level), which is optimistic but feasible. For this to happen, a number of factors would need to align (and/or): Several teams might want to join Bird or umbrella of brands and provide valuable tools or services to the community. Each of their bots or developments could provide great value to the community. (Personally, I might be one of those teams as well — I have some existing work on automated social analytics for more established projects, pulling data from various service APIs. Indirectly, it was through this analytics that I discovered your project.) Possibly, it could evolve into the “best front-end for pumpfun” (considering how many tokens of no real investment value are thrown around every second on pump-fan, and the lack of any built-in analytical tools, I currently don’t see pumpfun as a serious front-end for trading and investing).

@Dither_Solana wow, sounds unreal!

I hadn't really thought about the danger of a self-fulfilling prophecy—interesting. I've tried all the available ways to use Birdie. What I mean is that even if there’s justification, like: "Signal Reason: 50%+ of this developer's tokens have bonded, 65%+ have hit KOTH, and the recent token exceeded $500k market cap" (Which, by the way, I like—the bot explains the reasoning behind the signals), it could still mean that a few dozen people from the same dev team are sitting in a room with a hundred Solana, and one of them (of course, in full Wolf of Wall Street style) yells "SELL NOW!"—and suddenly, a massive red candle shoots downward. That’s what gives me the feeling that I’m playing against a casino. But overall, the fact that we can now track these "bad actors" before they even manage to buy in themselves makes me happy. 🙂 Also, are 50%+, 65%+ precise values, or are they intentionally rounded for clarity? Because I’d love to see something like 57.3%+ bonded, 69.2%+ KOTH in the bot’s reasoning. Otherwise, it starts to feel like I’m playing against the same group of devs every time.

@rovercrc More like April.

Cool! I personally checked — Bird really gives interesting results. But I still often feel that buying a coin based on a signal from Bird is mostly gambling—you’re relying on a small bunch of pumpers who will all exit at the same moment. It’s really frustrating to waste time on coins that don’t even link their own Twitter. Coins without Twitter or a community also puzzle me. Unpredictable. But I guess that's 99.9% of them. Funny enough, I actually found Bird through the AI of another project. Bird is a rare gem in this pile of junk.

Every great story starts from data. The difference is how you read it.

@rovercrc I hope this market cap growth won’t come from the sheer number of launched shitcoins on a pumpfun, but from solid, quality, and useful projects. And by the way, they do exist there too. Very rarely, but still.

@Sina1269167 to 100%

Once, I asked ChatGPT how likely this scenario is in this cycle specifically — the answer was about 1%. However, for the next cycle or the one after that, it seems to be around 25-30%

JackTheRippler ©️ @RippleXrpie

2 years ago

XRP holders are about to create generational wealth! $254 per #XRP 🚀📈

464 723 6K 813K 382

@Ashcryptoreal OR Pumpfun, without real analytics tools, should just fade from people's minds. But to be fair, it also makes fundraising easy for legit projects. Launch democratization has its value. And yeah, there’s truth in what you’re saying.

coinglass.com/LiquidationData Here's the link, if needed

Seeing heatmaps like these, I can’t help but think: leverage trading platforms should issue warnings like cigarette packs do. 🚨 ‘Trading with leverage can be addictive and lead to significant losses.’ Wouldn't that be more ethical?

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

I'm 99% sure this isn't the top. BTC at $149K looks very realistic. 🚀 As for ETH, I think this forecast is risky. It could go high, but not $10K—everyone will be waiting to sell there. Why would whales need your liquidity at those levels?

Ash Crypto @AshCrypto

2 years ago

🚨 BREAKING 🚨 THIS IS NOT THE MARKET TOP BITCOIN IS GOING TO $150K-$200K ETH IS EASILY GOING TO $10K ALTSEASON IS NOT CANCELLED ITS DELAYED BY 2-3 MONTHS

828 550 6K 471K 128