I see what's going on here. I think I'm beginning to see whose "FACTS" Wikipedia is operating on, and what "history" and "information" they are interested in curating. What a joke. It's all so obvious. Amazon. Soros. Google. Facebook (Meta). meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?ti…
"When the WMF (WikiMedia Foundation) announced the creation of an endowment w/ the Tides Foundation in January 2016, on Wikipedia’s 15th birthday, its goal was to accumulate $100 million over 10 years." Ah. The Tides Foundation. Morningstar Ratings. dailydot.com/debug/wikipedi…
I'd say for a stated "non-profit" the WikiMedia Foundation sure has a lot of revenue and assets. projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/org…
Meet the Former CEO of the Wikimedia Foundation (2016-2021) Katherine Maher. She looks completely unbiased & objective, someone who, I am sure, fought for ACCURACY over PROPAGANDA on Wikipedia. She's now Chairman of the Board at the Signal Foundation. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katherine…
With this kind of bio, there's no way Wikipedia could have been anything BUT objective and unbiased in the edits it approved and their dedication to the facts. Especially during her tenure from 2016-2021.