Do you realize that Science and religion are a recognized field of study, right? The systematic study of science and religion started in the 1960s. Theology and the Natural Sciences-divine action and how it can be understood in the light of various sciences. Why did they treat religious claims, such as the existence of God, as testable scientific hypotheses? (see, e.g., Dawkins 2006). or A lot of scientists claim that Christianity was unique and instrumental in catalyzing the scientific revolution.
Do you realize that Science and religion are a recognized field of study, right? The systematic study of science and religion started in the 1960s. Theology and the Natural Sciences-divine action and how it can be understood in the light of various sciences. Why did they treat religious claims, such as the existence of God, as testable scientific hypotheses? (see, e.g., Dawkins 2006). or A lot of scientists claim that Christianity was unique and instrumental in catalyzing the scientific revolution.
2. @valentinemage also, its interesting that Darwin was initially reluctant to publish on human origins. While he did not discuss human evolution in his Origin of Species, he promised, “Light will be thrown on the origin of man and his history” (1859: 487). Huxley (1863) wrote Man’s Place in Nature, the first book on human evolution from a Darwinian point of view which discussed fossil evidence, such as the then recently uncovered Neanderthal fossils from Gibraltar. lol