Lawyers can of course choose not to representing murderous terrorists rather than actively making a career out of it. Like lawyers that represent the mob ..
Lawyers can of course choose not to representing murderous terrorists rather than actively making a career out of it. Like lawyers that represent the mob ..
@Arron_banks I would have thought that the worst thing was representing Putin’s interests in trying to break up the EU. Other countries were expected to follow, but now they see all the downsides of breaking up the single market etc. @BylineTimes @peterjukes bylinetimes.com/2022/03/08/put…
@Arron_banks Google 'cab rank rule' then come back and delete this post.
@Arron_banks You are all misunderstanding what Arron meant by this post IMHO A barrister is not “forced” to represent anyone. It’s a choice. Explain to me how they are forced?
@Arron_banks Sounds like you'd benefit from reading more.
@Arron_banks Perhaps you grew up in a country where that does happen. But, not in our fabulous legal system in the UK.
@Arron_banks So no legal representation for people you don’t like. Some utopia that you fat little fascist.
( In The Legal world ) 🤮. Arron. “Law rule”, is of blue blood. Mob rule branded by law ( a con trick to remove the gavel ) is of red blood. / Law doesn’t break the Law. Example: Keir Starmer bullied the speaker of the house to ENABLE a breaking of the Law’s of Parliament, being the very same day to align the breach in his campaign to be Prime Minister. Every law abiding citizen would have been deemed to of broke the Law. We’re has the Legal Cartel “break the rules” that they ( Write ) and can change at will, at the cost of the sovereign majority on the very same ( day ) morning of the day they break them. A vote for Keir Starmer would be a direct “conflict of interest” between the gavel of Law and the rest of us.
@Arron_banks Mate, we are still on flags and hot cross buns. Think we're circling back to this next week.
@Arron_banks @Pipal1735 Let’s not pretend you’re in any position to lecture on moral superiority.