Allyson Luethy @Asamp13

@baroncoleman You’re gonna make us wait until Sunday to hear your theory. Looooonnnggg week. But okayyyyyy, you deserve a break too. 😎

@ZachCostello_ Out hereeeee doing the Lord’s WERK. 💪

According to an informed federal official, in the coming months the Trump administration plans to send a total of 40,000 Mark 84 and Blu-117 bombs to the government of Israel. Each bomb weighs 2,000 pounds. This appears to be the largest transfer of conventional explosive ordnance from the United States in modern history. How big is this shipment? It amounts to 40,000 tons of bombs. For perspective, the largest American air raid of World War Two was the Eighth Air Force’s attack on Berlin in March of 1945. Combined, the 2,023 Allied aircraft involved dropped about 3,000 tons of bombs. That’s 7.5 percent of what Trump is sending to Israel. That same month, March of 1945, the US Army Air Forces began the single most destructive bombing raid in human history, Operation Meetinghouse over Tokyo. More than 100,000 Japanese civilians were killed. By the end of that operation, the US had dropped 1,600 tons of bombs. That’s four percent of what Trump is sending to Israel. World War Two ended five months later, when the US dropped an atomic bomb on the city of Hiroshima. The shipment Trump is sending to Israel amounts to more than three times the destructive power of that nuclear explosion. There is no precedent for what the Trump administration is doing. Nor is there a justification. The government of Israel is not fighting World War Two, or even a war. It is engaged in periodic skirmishes with a guerrilla force in Lebanon, and it is working to exterminate an unarmed civilian population in Gaza. Neither front requires modern 2,000-pound bombs. An American-made Mark 84 has a destruction radius of half a mile. It releases a thermal wave the temperature of the surface of the sun. Within 100 feet of the explosion, rock melts and human flesh turns to vapor. The bomb collapses apartment buildings and leaves craters thirty-five feet deep. Until the war with Iran, the US military generally avoided using the Mark 84 in urban areas. It kills too many civilians. For the Netanyahu government, that’s been the upside. In the weeks after October 7, the IDF dropped nearly six hundred 2,000-pound bombs on densely populated areas in Gaza, including on more than 100 officially designated civilian evacuation zones. The slaughter was so grotesque and embarrassing that for a moment the Biden administration paused a shipment of Mark 84s. Those shipments quickly resumed under Trump. Now they’ve accelerated. It’s hard to overstate the scale of the crime the Israeli government is committing in Gaza. Over the last three years, more than a quarter-million Palestinians have been killed or wounded by Israeli forces there. The majority of them have been noncombatants: women, the elderly and tens of thousands of children. Many thousands more remain missing, presumably entombed under the rubble of 200,000 collapsed buildings. So far the Israelis have destroyed 92 percent of all homes in Gaza, and 34 of the 36 hospitals. By comparison, the 1945 Allied bombings of Dresden, now acknowledged as a war crime, destroyed about half of the city’s inhabited buildings. By any definition, what the Netanyahu government has done in Gaza is genocide. The 40,000 new bombs the Trump administration is sending will be used to do the same in Lebanon, and likely in other countries in the region. If you wanted to extend the Iran war into the indefinite future, this is exactly what you’d do. So far none of this has received public scrutiny. At some point, inevitably, it will be described in media accounts as an “arms sale.” It is not an arms sale. It is a gift, funded by American taxpayers through the Foreign Military Financing program, an arrangement designed to disguise welfare as capitalism: Congress appropriates money to the executive branch, which transfers the cash to Israel to “buy” American-made weapons, in this case from General Dynamics. Politicians claim this is a win for America. Most voters have no idea they paid for it. The bill in this case is about $3 billion. Add that to the $352 billion the US Treasury has transferred to Israel since 1951. How did this happen? The request for 40,000 new high-explosive civilian-killing bombs originated at the US Embassy in Jerusalem, which is run by Christian Zionist Ambassador Mike Huckabee and his aide David Milstein, who is the stepson of Fox News host Mark Levin. From there it moved to the State Department, where Marco Rubio enthusiastically approved it. At this point, only four more people need to sign off before the bombs ship to Israel: Senators Jim Risch and Jeanne Shaheen, the chairman and ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee; and Congressmen Brian Mast and Gregory Meeks, the top two members of the equivalent House committee. All four are committed neocons. Collectively they’ve taken millions from the Israel lobby. In 2015, Brian Mast traveled to Israel to volunteer for the Israeli military. In 2023, Mast showed up in the House of Representatives wearing an IDF uniform. It’s hard to imagine any of them hesitating before sending more free bombs to Israel. Only public outrage can stop this.

@researcherdaisy Daisy always coming quietly with the mic drops. 🎤

This is what a 30-06 looks like in sweat pants with a 6’8 man. Tyler Robinson was wearing skinny jeans. It’s the dumbest thing I’ve ever seen people lie about.

@FmrRepMTG @joekent16jan19 I hope this isn’t an AI photo 🤩

Andrew Let me offer advice. Experienced investigators pay close attention not only to what a person says, but to what they avoid, what provokes disproportionate anger, and where they repeatedly try to redirect attention. When someone confronted with factual questions responds by attacking the questioner’s character, motives, sanity and reputation, that behavior does not make the questions disappear. It makes investigators more interested in why those questions produce such an extreme reaction. Your response is not the language of a man calmly confident that the evidence supports him. It is the language of someone desperate to control the frame: Charlie’s death must be discussed only on your terms, Tyler Robinson must be accepted as the killer, alternative explanations must be ridiculed rather than examined, and anyone who refuses to comply must be publicly destroyed. That is not a rebuttal. It is containment. Candace has been conducting what every genuine investigation requires: collecting testimony, crowdsourcing information, following leads, testing theories and discarding those that fail. Some leads will inevitably reach dead ends. That is not proof of dishonesty; it is the nature of investigation. What matters is whether substantial questions remain unanswered—and they do. Yet instead of answering those questions with evidence, you substitute moral outrage, mockery and character assassination. You invoke Charlie, Erika and the children as emotional shields, as though grief grants you exclusive authority over the facts or makes scrutiny immoral. It does not. You claim Candace lacks proof while demanding that everyone accept Tyler Robinson’s guilt despite evidence that remains weak, contested and inconclusive. You therefore apply one standard to Candace and another to the official narrative: absolute proof is required before she may ask questions, but certainty is demanded from the public before the case itself has established it. That contradiction is becoming impossible to miss. So here is the advice an experienced interrogator might give you: stop attacking the person asking the questions and start answering the questions themselves. Stop repeating certainty where certainty has not been earned. Stop behaving as though investigation is a threat. Because every time you respond to evidence with sarcasm or moral outrage, to questions with insults, and to uncertainty with enforced certainty, you do not make Candace look less credible. You make yourself look more concerned about where the investigation may lead. @RealCandaceO @baroncoleman @JohnMappin @ImMappin @joekent16jan19 @TRobinsonNewEra @LionelMedia @IanCarrollShow @AwakenWithJP @jimmy_dore @OwenBenjamin @leahfiles @realstewpeters @EstulinVz @RealAlexJones @HarrisonHSmith @BlakeSNeff @TPUSA @DonaldJTrumpJr #TylerRobinson #CharlieKirk #TPUSA #Israel

Andrew Kolvet @AndrewKolvet

4 months ago

See, your big problem is that this entire thing is not about you, Candace. It’s about Charlie. It’s about Erika. It’s about his kids and his legacy. But time and time again you’ve hijacked Charlie’s story by smearing and slandering his wife, his org, and his friends (and

2K 2K 19K 2.2M 470

@ViKu1111 💯. Don’t worry though. Andrew has questions now. 🙄

He will be funded by ALPAC

Polymarket @Polymarket

4 months ago

BREAKING: Tucker Carlson reveals he is building a new political party to rival Republicans.

1K 494 6K 1.2M 300

@IanCarrollShow And he’s a HOOT.

@baroncoleman @researcherdaisy So sorry for your friend. Thanks for being a good friend. It reiterates I’m spending what is equivalent to a part time job listening to the proper people.

@FinanceWolves I literally had to watch it on Twitter, bc it was impossible to find on YouTube.

@juliandorey @IanCarrollShow PREACH.

YUP. I just watched this in it’s entirety. Kudos.

Project Constitution @ProjectConstitu

6 months ago

🚨EXCLUSIVE: Texas State TPUSA Chapter Member Just RESIGNED & Dropped a SCATHING Resignation Letter CRITICIZING Erika Kirk and Other TPUSA Executives 👀 Mason Lemme (@LemmeReact) officially disassociated from Turning Point USA on April 10th — exactly 7 months after Charlie

560 3K 13K 743K 2K

@LibertyLockPod I swear he’s lost it as bad as 46. To go from an America First platform to this is absolutely stunning. 🤜 afafo 🤛

@TONYxTWO Had to check the date. I thought this was April Fools.

@LibertyLockPod How are you losing followers? Gotta be bots bc you should only be gaining followers under current circumstances. Must be 2 Clint Russells and the other is the loser they meant to follow. 🤓

@Polymarket Where else have I heard “this will end in two weeks”??? You know just two weeks to flatten the curve.

@DangerousTruth1 Amazing!!! Hats off to the person preserving his true legacy!

@BillTD22 Only read half the sentence clearly. 😆 I guess it’s battle of the PE firms for better Bundt dominance. Def no way I want to live my life.