I refuse to be gaslit into believing that it's ok to evade legitimate questions about conflicts of interest by speculating about the emotional state of the asker. This happens all the time to women. Surely @Ayjchan is as sick of it as I am. And also, it's a pretty weak response
I refuse to be gaslit into believing that it's ok to evade legitimate questions about conflicts of interest by speculating about the emotional state of the asker. This happens all the time to women. Surely @Ayjchan is as sick of it as I am. And also, it's a pretty weak response https://t.co/Fg0B4TBJxf
@angie_rasmussen I agree that my earlier response was in poor form. I have now created a thread where anyone can comment. x.com/ayjchan/status…
@angie_rasmussen I agree that my earlier response was in poor form. I have now created a thread where anyone can comment. x.com/ayjchan/status…
@Ayjchan Great. I saw that you really did not address most of the concerns I raised, but perhaps you are not finished yet since you instead decided to fabricate more defamatory speculations about Eddie Holmes. I look forward to further clarifications.
@angie_rasmussen Can you clarify what defamatory speculations I have made about Ed Holmes? It is clear from the data deposited on the public NCBI database that he collaborated with the Wuhan Institute Virology lab suspected of being involved in #OriginOfCovid
@angie_rasmussen You mentioned in your thread that it was obvious (to who?) that Holmes had collaborated with the Wuhan scientists when he authored Proximal Origin and all the other manuscripts dismissing lab #OriginOfCovid - did none of the co-authors suggest declaring this obvious relationship?
@Ayjchan @angie_rasmussen I don't understand "didn't tell us he had been collaborating with the Wuhan Institute of Virology's Shi Zhengli to hunt for SARS-like viruses", as that seems to differ from Holmes's description of the collaboration at 39:45 - 48:55 of youtu.be/5u94foNmpKE.