Thus particular group of scientists have done a lot of damage to science consistently over the past 3 years.
Thus particular group of scientists have done a lot of damage to science consistently over the past 3 years.
@NateSilver538 A small, tight-knit group is responsible for all of the major articles.
@BiophysicsFL @NateSilver538 How do I read this graph exactly?
@BiophysicsFL @NateSilver538 Andersen is shameless
@BiophysicsFL Oh look, the conspiracy creeps made a harassment list
@BiophysicsFL @NateSilver538 Crazy how there’s still a ( not my hands) Kristian Andersen dominating the fairy tales
@BiophysicsFL @NateSilver538 Almost as if they are conspiring. After all the definition of a conspiracy is two or more people working to effect an outcome.
@BiophysicsFL @NateSilver538 Which are flawed!
@BiophysicsFL @NateSilver538 The technical term, in social network analysis, is 'clique' I would wager this level of cliquey-ness over multiple works is unusual in scientist collaboration networks
@BiophysicsFL @NateSilver538 a rule of thumb is that the group of people at the frontier of any literature is more or less of 100 people in size