Another quality update: We’re improving the way Rating Impact is calculated, which improves the average quality of proposed notes (as perceived by people from different points of view). This means contributors’ time and energy gets spent reviewing higher quality proposals. How it works: Ratings of “Helpful” on notes that eventually reach a status of “Not Helpful” are an especially reliable indicator of a contributors’ support for notes that many people have considered low-quality or spammy. Starting today, contrasting ratings on “Not Helpful” notes will count as two negative Rating Impact points instead of one. Here's an example of the new math in action: To put the impact in perspective, if this calculation had been in place historically, it would have resulted in nearly 1000 proposals that people found “Not Helpful” from being shown in the first place, along with another 7000+ proposals that didn’t reach a definitive status.
Another quality update: We’re improving the way Rating Impact is calculated, which improves the average quality of proposed notes (as perceived by people from different points of view). This means contributors’ time and energy gets spent reviewing higher quality proposals. How it works: Ratings of “Helpful” on notes that eventually reach a status of “Not Helpful” are an especially reliable indicator of a contributors’ support for notes that many people have considered low-quality or spammy. Starting today, contrasting ratings on “Not Helpful” notes will count as two negative Rating Impact points instead of one. Here's an example of the new math in action: To put the impact in perspective, if this calculation had been in place historically, it would have resulted in nearly 1000 proposals that people found “Not Helpful” from being shown in the first place, along with another 7000+ proposals that didn’t reach a definitive status.
This makes me want to jump right in and rate more notes 🤨-especially when I take this seriously and do NOT rate notes that I think I have a bias towards…every community noter should have integrity and if they get it wrong, should NOT be penalized….I wouldn’t need to be paid for my service-but it IS a service especially lately with all the war propaganda
@CommunityNotes Btw…Does anyone know what a good score is???
I object to Community Notes for the same reason that I object to anonymous Fact Checkers to whom you cannot respond. "X" is a free speech platform for DEBATE. Community Notes usurps a position of superiority over all other commentors (debators). Checking a box is not a debate, and most of the boxes to check are irrelevant and do not give a true understanding of an objection to the Note. Community Notes tends to favor the same Establishment almighty righteous ones who think that their point of view is the CORRECT one and all others are inferior to theirs. They are rewarded with a superior position and reach which none of us commoners get. This is just another form of WOKEISM. It not fair and impartial. Why does everyone get to vote on their "Favored Comment" but not get to voice a real objection or clarification? This STINKS. Most of the Notes that I have seen seem to be from Establishment Shills (Big Pharma, Big Government, etc.). Government and Big Pharma LIES got millions of people killed or maimed for life. It is difficult to get the TRUTH out when most sheeple have bought into the LIE.
@CommunityNotes Community Notes has helped the platform that is @X
@CommunityNotes SAD 😢 SAD 😢 SAD 😢 SAD 😢 bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
@CommunityNotes You tech guys and gals are so smart and I pray every day for you to stay on the path of truth. Love this update!💗🙏📌
@CommunityNotes Community Notes is one of the best things about X
@CommunityNotes How about CN stop asking me to rate notes in a language I don't speak? While we can translate the original post, we aren't able to translate the notes. Waste of my time.
@CommunityNotes Add a quick one click - This should be a comment button