Again, the onus was on the government, the suspicion having arisen that it looked the other way at China’s interference/intimidation of opposition MPs, to clear the air — by appointing someone acceptable on all sides to look into it.
Again, the onus was on the government, the suspicion having arisen that it looked the other way at China’s interference/intimidation of opposition MPs, to clear the air — by appointing someone acceptable on all sides to look into it.
@acoyne Throw around accusations to the government and the onus is on them to prove they're innocent? Isn't that bass-ackwards? The onus is usually on the accuser to prove something is true, not the accused.
@CouchRaptors @acoyne This isn't a court case. But imagine if it were. It would be quite a remarkable case, where only the defense is allowed to see the evidence and it proclaims itself innocent.