A CONTROL FREAK ON A POWER TRIP : SACK THE eSAFTEY COMMISSIONER Warning : Unelected Censorship Julie has ruled Australians must be prohibited from seeing the following video (after everyone has already seen it) š«£Itās horrific and very disturbing - but why should the video of attack on Bishop Mar Mari Emmanuel by censored at the whim of the eSafety Commissioner ? Itās real life, it actually happened. Itās not fake news or "misinformation". š«£The video doesnāt glorify violence - so why should the paternalistic eSafety Commissioner decide if Australians should or shouldnāt be allowed to view it. ? š«£And other than a control freak getting their kicks from a power trip - whatās the point of censoring it after millions have already seen it ? š«£And why censor the video, but not the still shots ? š«£But the real concern is, how are we going to face the realities and consequences of Islamic extremism in the real world, if the real world is being censored ? š«£How can we debate the issue if we are not allowed to see what happened ? š«£Would have Censorship Julie have censored the horrific and highly disturbing images of a young girl naked screaming and burnt by napalm dropped by American bombers during the Vietnam War ? š«£Or what about the extreme brutality and highly distressing scenes of Dan Andrewsā militia during Covid bashing citizens, stomping on heads and firing rubber bullets into the backs of peaceful protestors - should that be censored and Australians prohibited from seeing the truth ? š«£Or was that OK because it sent a "message" to anyone that questioned government policy ? š«£Or what of videos of people in distress from Covid vaccine injuries - should these be censored ? š«£The world is a tough brutal place, but how can we deal with the realities of real world violence, if the real world is being censored ? š«£Itās dangerous enough to allow government bureaucrats to be the arbiters of truth, and censor what they deem as "misinformation" - but itās another thing to give them the power to censor real life situations. The only exceptions should be where the video is used to incite violence. Further, the video actually shows a miracle. To be struck as he was 6 times and to survive was a true miracle - it shows that someone was looking after the Bishop. Should this be censored ? š«£And where was the eSafety Commissioner, Censorship Julie when videos showing hate preachers inciting violence (something that is unlawful) were being posted across the internet. ? š¤And am I even allowed to post this video criticising Censorship Julieās censorship - will she demand that X censor this criticism of her ?
@CraigKellyPHON She must of been put forward by sir kevin Rudd šššš
@CraigKellyPHON She won't answer Craig so I'll ask you, if you know. Who is the office of E-safety commissioner accountable to. Is there an elected minister or ombudsman we could appeal to?
@CraigKellyPHON We don't need more parents
As the Chief Commissioner of Censorship, she excels in her role. Were other autocratic governments to possess an individual of her caliber, they might have endured. However, despite her proficiency, it is certain that she will be the most detested and reviled creature in the country, as the populace will harbor great animosity towards her.
@CraigKellyPHON @PaulineHansonOz I say Australians should be prohibited from seeing the hate filled protests on our city streets, well organised protesters funded by ???? āit is clear that they are a permissive cauldron for radicalisation allowed on our streets for seven months.ā Peter Jennings