3 years ago is irrelevant to now. We also made the SB with the worst OL ever so should we continue going with a bad OL every year? Tee didn't cost 21M 3 years ago. The point was if they want to win a SB then they should have traded or extended to maximize their resource usage.
3 years ago is irrelevant to now. We also made the SB with the worst OL ever so should we continue going with a bad OL every year? Tee didn't cost 21M 3 years ago. The point was if they want to win a SB then they should have traded or extended to maximize their resource usage.
@DarthNoobSaibot We are better at oline now and we still have tee sir. Yes that 21 mill could help at other areas but also will make the wr room weaker than it already is. Trading him now doesn't make us better.
@DarthNoobSaibot Not disagreeing, but I feel like you’re underestimating the value of one season of Tee. If extension isn’t in the budget, the decision comes down to what others offer and if those are worth more than one year of a top ~10 WR. We’ll never know the offers but I bet they’re weak
@DarthNoobSaibot Tied their hands in FA this year and will probably do it again next year...
@DarthNoobSaibot yeah id argue if we got an early 2 for tee and went into this year with Fuaga/Newton + Tee Replacement 2nd Rounder/FA we picked up if we traded him early we might be in a better spot. but tee could also finally be healthy and go for 1,200 and 8 touchdowns and be HUGE for us