This article highlights the weaponization of ethics: The focus on the efforts of Ebright and Nickels, who strive to uncover the origins of a pandemic and prevent future outbreaks, reveals a disturbing sociopathy among certain scientists. Certain "scientists" who spearheaded this complaint against Nickels and Ebright use ethical principles in a Machiavellian way, cynically as both defenses and weapons. They impose rigorous moral standards on their colleagues while conveniently bypassing these standards themselves, revealing a Machiavellian manipulation in their ethical stance. This hypocrisy not only uncovers deep duplicity but also constitutes sociopathic behavior, compelling us to scrutinize the darker undercurrents of ethical conduct among this clique of virologists I have mentioned before. Moreover, the ease with which these scientists can prompt journalists from prominent outlets like Science and the LA Times to attack their adversaries suggests a level of influence and control akin to mafia behavior. Organized virology crime.
What was esp ironic about that letter to Rutgers from Andersen et al, as covered by Hiltzik, was that the accusations they took objection to, particularly from Ebright, weren't even directed towards any of these Andersen et al authors. They were more directed toward Fauci, who none of these authors legally represented. Thus none of these authors had a real standing for their complaint. Though, of course, Hiltzik made and continues to make more explicit and direct comparisons betw. people like Trump and Hitler on a routine basis. Yet this is somehow acceptable for people like Hiltzik to do w/o the slightest recognition of their hypocrisy.
Dr. Hermiz, do you have pinned or highlighted posts that convey what changes you recommend for the health system? Here are mine, 5 simple but I believe dramatically effective changes. From my Substack article. 1. Make it illegal for pharmaceutical companies to advertise or sponsor or gift to any medical institution, health insurance company, individual scientists (not hired by same) or any medical journal, social media network, TV, magazine, newspaper (paper or electronic). If this requires a new constitutional amendment, I'm sure an enraged public will get it passed. In the interim, have the FDA restore it's pre-1977 rule on pharmaceutical company presence in advertisement media prior to 1997 (see drmichaelwayne.com/blog/drug-ads-… ). 2. Abolish the FDA, NIH (Fauci's department is part of NIH), and CDC, allow the 50 states (and DC plus US Territories) to decide how they want to do similar functions, whether as an individual state or as a member of a group of states, the obvious reaction will be that there will be a dominant blue-state approach, a dominant red-state approach, and a dominant mix-match approach. I would agree to a minimal federal law requirement. Nobody can sell a drug or medical device that is not insured for liability protection (remove vaccine liability protection first). Liability insurance company underwriting testing labs would end up being setup to evaluate the risk of a new drug seeking liability protection then. Better to have competing safety certifying labs, so customers over time learn which testing labs do a better job. The counterpoint that many vaccines would not be produced is that (a) only bad vaccines would be stopped (good), (b) mandatory vaccine mandates would not be workable (of course, since one has abolished the FDA, NIH and CDC), and (c) vaccines would become voluntary and possibly more expensive but perhaps coverable under medical insurance. 3. Stop taxpayer funding of medical research, instead provide the incentives via a double-value or triple-value tax deduction approach for individual taxpayers to fund competing medical grant financial foundations. A double-value tax deduction, means a $1 given allows the individual to record on their taxes they donated $2. 4. Have the Congress pass these laws on a non-recorded vote so that their pharmaceutical overlords can't see how individual legislators voted (it's a simple procedural rule to allow bill passage by aye-nay voices). 5. Recommend individual states to abolish the DECERTIFICATION practices of individual medical licensing boards and pharmacy licensing boards; replace the decertification process by the use of civil law suits that require a trial by jury. For more, please follow. I have another article detailing item 3 above. The above is from my Substack article: Five, Simple, Dramatic Changes for the USA in a Sane Post-Pandemic World open.substack.com/pub/postpandem…
@DrHermiz Maybe RICO can be applied due to their mafia like behaviour.
@DrHermiz How do you get this down like that? ✌️😑🖐
@DrHermiz Friedrich Nietzsche once stated that, "God is dead." I'm not sure if God is deceased, but ethics certainly is.
@DrHermiz the people who lied about their research, which lead to the COVID outbreak, are talking about ethics. too ironic.