Epacaن 🇦🇺🇮🇹 @Epaca6

@ListenToLewko 💯

What If Christians Had Done 9/11 to a Muslim Country? Imagine 19 Christians hijacked planes, destroyed a Muslim country’s most iconic buildings, struck its military headquarters, and slaughtered thousands-while declaring they did it for Christianity and quoting the Bible. Imagine their Christian leader claimed responsibility, Christians funded and protected his organization, and pastors celebrated the massacre. What would happen to Christians across Muslim countries? Would everyone suddenly preach tolerance and insist Christianity had absolutely nothing to do with it? Would churches and Christian minorities be left alone? And 25 years later, would the attacked city elect a Christian mayor while critics of Christianity were condemned as “Christianophobes”? You know the answer. So spare me the hypocrisy.

Have you noticed how all the people who advocate for socialism are the people who contribute the least to society? That is not a coincidence. Why work and why try when you can just take other peoples stuff?

If you have a son or daughter who's starting to think that socialism is the answer to our problems, I want you to try something and report back: Next time you talk, don't argue. Sit down, ask these questions, and just listen: - When you say "socialism," do you mean that you want the government to pay for a bigger safety net like in Denmark, or that the government owns the means of production? Because those are two very different countries. - You say the system is rigged. Who rigged it? And who should be handed the power to un-rig it? - Who sets the price of bread? If not a single person or corporation, what causes that price to remain steady or go up? - Can you name a country where the state took ownership of the means of production and the poor got richer? - When borders open or the walls fall down, anywhere in the world, which direction do people run? Towards the free market system or the socialist system? And before the boundaries fell, which way were the guns pointed? - Would you rather be poor today, or rich in 1900? By the way, only one of those has antibiotics. - If you and I make a voluntary trade, and we both walk away happy, who got hurt? - Someone has to decide what your work is worth. Would you rather it be you and the person paying you, or a bureaucrat with an army who has never met either of you? Try having this conversation with your kids this week. Don't argue. Only listen. And if you want, call into my radio show and tell me how it went.

@Erin_Molan

Karl Stefanovic's mistake was not calling to globalise the Intifada. If he'd done that he'd be offered a podcasting gig with the ABC. And if they ever sacked him for supporting terror groups he'd get a huge payout as well. Rookie.

Lara Logan just broke down a pattern that hits different once you see it. They keep creating problems that can never actually be solved: racism that’s “unconscious,” masculinity as inherently toxic, CO2 as the enemy even though we breathe it out, and differences turned into permanent grievances. The goal? Issues without end. Skin color can’t change. Breathing can’t stop. Masculine instinct doesn’t vanish. So the problems stay… and so does the control. It’s not about fixing anything. It’s about keeping the fight alive so we stay divided and easier to manage. Once you spot the tactic, everything gets clearer. What “unsolvable problem” have you noticed getting pushed the hardest lately?

@DrewPavlou On behalf of Italian migrants to the socialist greens MP .....

PSA: Don’t post pictures of your kids or grandkids online. This is really important. When I worked sex crimes, we’d often find photos of random kids, and sometimes even info from parents’ Facebook accounts on suspects’ hard drives. This was non-sexual material that was nevertheless being used as fuel for fantasies. Sometimes the images would be altered to make them pornographic. More importantly, there was evidence of escalation in some cases — driving past houses, taking pictures at schools, that sort of thing. I never saw it escalate to abduction, but in a few cases it was clearly heading that way, and I’d be very surprised if it hasn’t done so elsewhere in the country. Unless you have your social media accounts locked down so that only friends and family can access it, don’t risk it — and even then, I personally wouldn’t take the chance.

Yes Jane, because you haven't grown up. All children are lefties because the home is the one place where socialism works. "From each according to their abilities, to each according to their need" is literally how healthy families function. A child is not able to pull their weight, so adults do it for them. But the deal in a family is this: I'm going to do this for you today, tomorrow you're doing to do this for yourself, and after that you're going to do it for the next generation. It's ok for a child to be dependent, even a 'But that's not fair' Marxist...Children are obsessed with 'fairness', with the equal distribution... But it's not ok for a healthy adult to STAY dependent, to stay obsessed with the distribution. Being an adult means saddling up and becoming focussed on the PRODUCTION of wealth, pulling your weight, creating more than you consume, in fact creating enough not only for your own consumption but for that of your dependent children also. You broke the deal. You stayed a lefty, a parasite, you want to take the effort and productivity of others and distribute it according to your version of equity and fairness rather than doing the work to create more and make the world a better place, and that makes you a parasite. You haven't grown up yet. You think it's 'self serving' that some people want to keep the product of their own labour? Then what is it to think you have the right to STEAL the product of other people's labour? Tyranny wearing a mask of virtue is what it is.

Jane Caro @JaneCaro

5 months ago

Don’t be daft. The older I get the more self serving I realise the right is.

691 133 2K 171K 33

A continuación una guía de cómo subir fotos de sus hijos a redes para que no corran riesgo de que terminen siendo compartidas en páginas de ped0f1lia: Paso 1: No suban fotos de sus hijos a redes.

@CancunKaren @JackPosobiec Fascinating! My mum's ancestors fled Croatia during the same period, crossed the Adriatic and settled in the region of Molise in Italy. The three towns (Acquaviva Collecroce, Montemitro, San Felice) still speak an old Croatian dialect to this day.

@Ryandally08 Pharmacist here 👋 when dispensing, he should really be focusing on the task at hand and making sure he's not making a dispensing error.... not filming himself flapping on about globalising the intifada. What a douchebag and embarrassment to our profession 🙄

@BojeebaTheShark @Ostrov_A Except we all know a riot would happen or she'd be peacefully stabbed if she'd said those words 🤷‍♀️

The idea that being “indigenous” automatically grants moral ownership of land collapses the moment you look at actual human history and apply a consistent moral standard to it. Long before Europeans arrived, Native American tribes fought, displaced, absorbed, and sometimes wiped out other tribes. The Iroquois Confederacy expanded by crushing rivals. The Aztec Empire grew through conquest, coercion, and tribute. Entire peoples vanished not because of outsiders, but because stronger neighbors took their land. This was not an exception. It was the rule. Morality cannot selectively ignore facts. If land was already changing hands through violence and domination, then “who was there first” cannot logically create an eternal moral claim. A past act of conquest does not become morally sacred simply because enough time has passed. This is not a uniquely American story. It is the story of Homo sapiens everywhere. Humans migrate, compete, conquer, assimilate, and redraw borders. Always have. Always will. No population on earth holds land because history peacefully granted it moral title. Land is held because, at some point, power determined the outcome. Modern moral legitimacy therefore cannot come from ancestry alone. It comes from present responsibility. From how societies govern today, how rights are protected today, and how power is exercised now. Morality applies to living systems, not frozen historical snapshots chosen for political convenience. “Indigenous” is not a scientific or ethical category. It is a political one. It freezes history at a convenient moment and declares that everything before that moment does not count. Who decides that moment? Whoever benefits from it. If you rewind history far enough, every group was once indigenous. If you stop history early enough, every conqueror can reinvent themselves as a victim. Moral arguments about land that ignore this reality are not about justice. They are about power, timing, and narrative control.

@guy_herbert @HamasAtrocities It really is a mafia state!

@LiangRhea Does the bible also show a map from the old testament? You'll find the Kingdom of Israel on that. Interestingly, you will never find the word Palestine in the actual old and new testament scriptures. Fascinating

@ausbtcclub 💯 my Nonno adored Australia... always thankful for the opportunity that came with the hardship.... he always said 'meglio morto in Australia che vivo in Italia' (better dead in Australia than alive in Italy)

My nonna and nonno came to Australia from Italy in 1955 with a suitcase and 5 Lire in their pockets. Mum was born 1959,Auntie 1961. In 1963, nonno went to the royal Melbourne hospital after work, and never came out. Died from a procedure that is conducted in an hour or so today. Nonna had no idea where he was that night, waited, waited, and found out he passed away and was in shock. Nonna never remarried. Had two daughters under the age of 5, widowed, and spoke 0 English. She worked in the sweatshop factories in Flemington making shoes, then in the evening, would bring home leathers and continue to work through the night. She never had any government support. In my teen years, she worked two jobs (fish n chip shop in Ascot Vale). I was born in her house, where she raised me until 22 years old. My earliest memories are in prep, where she would pick my brother and I up from school and walk us to the factory and continue her shoe shift until 5pm, while my brother and I would play with Lego's on the floors of this dusty old building. At 5pm, we would help her load the car boot with unfinished shoes and bring them inside her home to finish. Nonna would cook dinner for us all, clean, then we went to bed. You'd hear an industrial grade, loud sewing machine work its gears into midnight. Morning would come, my brother and I would help her box up the shoes, ready us for school, load the car, then drop us off at school. Her life was hard from 1955, up until the late 1990s. When Italy played Australia in soccer, she cheered on Australia. When Australia played cricket, she cheered on Australia. (She loved cricket). She also never missed an Australian tennis open, where Pat Rafter was her digital boyfriend for many tournaments. I want to share this story because in a time where females had it tough, no English, no husband, no government support, she gave my family everything it has today. It's evidence that hard working immigrants deserve a spot here. I'm not against migration, but im measuring every single person to my nonna, and I can tell you right now, they would all buckle if they chose her life. Australia must tighten immigration, but more importantly, vet out hard working immigrants that help us grow as a country. If you commit one crime, you are out. If you don't want to work, you are out. If you take advantage of government schemes like NDIS, you are out. My nonna had a fucking spine. She never complained. She learnt English, she waved the Australian flag. If you come to this country, as migrants ourselves, we live by Australian rules. Aussie Aussie Aussie, Oi Oi Oi

@LiangRhea Your point was illustrated and the precedent set when Randa was part of a campaign that ultimately succeeded in having a pro-Israel author cancelled in 2024 🤷‍♀️