I actually have lenses implanted into my eyes. I couldn’t read the big E on the eye chart without correction. The dipshits that trash talk science bcs they are butthurt about their religious beliefs can eat my shit. I can fucking see bcs science. Intelligent design my ass.
@atheist_bad Doesn’t disprove intelligent design. Just proves science can study and replicate said design, if it be intelligent design.
@HereForFacepalm @atheist_bad That’s not really acceptable. Explain to me why it cannot be intelligent design then genius.
@ghobkilt @HereForFacepalm @atheist_bad Remember your claim is not merely design, it is a *perfect* designer. Disproving perfect design is trivial. Two words: toilet paper.
@Galcondude @HereForFacepalm @atheist_bad More ad hominem. Where is that atheist intellect?
@ghobkilt @Galcondude @HereForFacepalm FYI - you have no idea what an ad hominem fallacy is. Not even in the fucking ballpark.
@atheist_bad @ghobkilt @HereForFacepalm I hate it when they call ad hominem and I didn’t even call them a fucking idiot. At least I then get to explain that an ad hominem is “you’re wrong because you’re an idiot” in stead of “you’re wrong *and* you’re an idiot.”
@Galcondude @atheist_bad @HereForFacepalm No an ad hominem is to attack the character or essence without attacking the argument. Your point was that it was toilet paper. That was your debate. That attacks character and essence. Not argument. Therefor it is Ad Hominem.
@ghobkilt @atheist_bad @HereForFacepalm No it’s not and also not what I did, the need for toilet paper is an excellent example of how we are not perfectly designed. Perhaps think about it.
@Galcondude @ghobkilt @HereForFacepalm Thinking isn’t their strong suit.