Fatima Gantz @GantzFatima

Yes, with one correction: Islam didn't “cause” European dominance. Europe did not wake up in the sixteenth century, rub two sticks together, invent science and capitalism, and conquer the world by sheer civilizational genius. It inherited the Islamic civilization that transmitted and expanded mathematics, medicine, astronomy, philosophy, navigation, and commerce. Europe absorbed that inheritance, then fused it with militarized states, colonial conquest, slavery, enclosure, and extraction. If you want to see naked Europe without Islam, look at the Middle Ages. Europe inherited knowledge, concentrated it, commodified it, armed it, and used it to dominate much of the world from which that knowledge had come. And this is exactly why nationalist mythologies hate messy history. White Christian nationalists need a self-created Christian West. Zionist nationalist narratives falls into the same trap when they portray Jewish civilization as original, when it is a fact that Muslim societies influenced Sephardic life developed for centuries. History is far less obedient. Civilizations borrow, translate, absorb, appropriate, conquer, and steal. Europe did all of that exceptionally well. Then it wrote the textbook claiming it had invented everything itself.

Yes, The Alamo is a Muslim Site The outrage over acknowledging Islamic origin of the Alamo is not about history. It is about power. Power over narrative, identity, and what people are permitted to remember. Let’s call it what it is. The loudest objectors are not defending history. They are policing it. What you are seeing is a familiar alliance of Islamophobes, Zionist revisionists who curate memory to suit politics, and white Christian nationalist extremists who need the past to look clean, linear, Christian, and racially pure in order to sustain their mythology. Because once you admit the obvious, that Spain was profoundly shaped, enriched, and transformed by Islamic civilization, the fantasy starts to crack. The Alamo came through Spain. Spain was not culturally sealed off from the world. For centuries it absorbed Islamic mathematics, Islamic design, Islamic aesthetics, Islamic architecture, and Islamic intellectual influence. That inheritance did not magically disappear because modern ideologues find it inconvenient. It traveled. It endured. It embedded itself in the architectural vocabulary that crossed the Atlantic and took root in the Americas. Denying that is not patriotism. It is censorship wrapped in chauvinism. It is Islamophobia pretending to be heritage. And here is the hypocrisy. The same people who preach endlessly about Western civilization, continuity, and tradition suddenly develop selective amnesia the moment that continuity runs through Muslim Spain. Then influence no longer counts. Transmission no longer counts. Evidence no longer counts. Why? Because it contaminates the myth they are selling. And the same fraud appears when they talk about Jews. Sephardic culture did not emerge in some sealed chamber of civilizational purity. It was formed across centuries of life in Muslim lands. The food, the language, the dress, the music, the poetic sensibility, and even the texture and sound of religious life were profoundly shaped by Islam. That does not make Sephardic Jews less Jewish. It makes them living evidence that Jewish history itself was deeply influenced by Muslim civilization. That truth is intolerable to white nationalist fantasists and their Zionist narrative enforcers because it shatters the myth of pure, isolated, uncontaminated identities. They want the Alamo frozen inside a fairy tale of white civilizational purity. They want a monument with one ancestry, one approved identity, one politically useful story. But history does not work that way. Civilizations are built through contact, conquest, borrowing, imitation, adaptation, and inheritance. The West itself is a layered construction, and some of its most celebrated forms came through direct contact with Islam. That is the truth these people cannot stand. So they shriek about revisionism, when they are the revisionists. They are the ones cutting away whole chapters of history to protect a brittle ideological fiction. Let’s be precise. The Alamo was not a mosque. That is the straw man they hide behind because they cannot answer the real argument. The real argument is about lineage, influence, and transmission. And on that ground their denial collapses. Because the evidence does not care about their political sensitivities. It does not care about white nationalist mythology. It does not care about Zionist narrative management. It does not care about culture war panic. The Alamo is not a hermetically sealed relic. It is part of a much older civilizational chain, one that runs through Al-Andalus whether the gatekeepers like it or not. And that is what this fight is really about. Not facts. Not scholarship. Control. Stone remembers. Revisionists erase. Muslim history will outlast them all.

Stop Using Trans Muslims as Clickbait This “movie” about an alleged trans convert to Islam “looking for a boyfriend” is pure troll bait. He’s neither a Muslim nor transgender. He's a Zionist actor. It’s cosplay using faith + identity as props for clicks. And real trans Muslims pay the price, more stereotypes, more ridicule, less credibility. Stop platforming stunts that harm our vulnerable LGTBQ+ Muslim communities.

@SchnitzelKroos

You sure know a lot of big words for a basement manboy. Is it because you have a triple PhD from Oxford? - tikkun olam - resultant - manifest (like in “made manifest”) - fanfiction - long-winded - ad hominem - Mildred Gillars - petulantly - formulae - ideological possession - polity If you are such a gifted theologian and philosopher, why are all of your comments always so short and cryptic? Why do you repost so much fluff and write so little original content? You know, I've changed my mind, I don’t think you are a basement-dwelling manboy. My new theory comrade, is that you are a Russian sock puppet (out of hundreds who hang around real conversations and inject your worthless influence narratives. What do you think about that, tovarish Karl?

Yep, you called me a fraud in the initial post, you still call me a fraud, and you accuse me of ad hominem attacks? Why are you so vicious? People with real lives don't spend all of their time on social media looking for fights with complete strangers. Unless, of course, they either get paid to do so or they live in their mother's basement. And based on your encyclopedic knowledge of everything, I would classify you as a basement dweller. I just don't see how anyone would pay you to produce this crud.

Yes, @ouroborosKXM, I can see you perfectly, down there in the dimly lit basement of your single mom’s house, marinating in stained sweatpants you’ve been “meaning to wash,” running on Mountain Dew and spite. You haven’t showered in two weeks, there’s a limited edition Michael Bolton t-shirt clinging on for dear life, and a heroic box of Kleenex on the table like it’s part of the décor. And on the wall, because of course, three PhD diplomas from Oxford: Islamic Studies, Biblical Studies, and a prestigious “Seminary”. And the room? The room really completes the dissertation. This isn’t just a basement, it’s a carefully curated ecosystem. The air is a permanent blend of stale carpet, old radiator heat, sweat, desperation, and “something spilled here once and we’ve all agreed not to talk about it.” The only light source is your monitor, casting that noble bluish glow over the mid-1950s wood paneling and a landscape of collapsed pizza boxes stacked like archaeological layers (“Late Pepperoni Period,” “The Great Stuffed-Crust Collapse,” “The 2nd Margarita Conquest”). There’s a half-empty two-liter of something neon, a mini-fridge making a noise like it’s dying emotionally, and a chair that has never once met a posture it respected. On the shelves sit your “collector” superhero figurines, especially the serious ones: scantily clad women posing with swords and little armor that somehow protects nothing. Right beside them, for balance, hangs a collector’s edition Klingon flag, mounted proudly like you’re one cosplay away from declaring sovereign territory. Next to that is the personal “Damascus forged” dagger of Charlemagne that is absolutely, definitely, 100% authentic, according to the same energy that convinced you you’re fluent in Arabic, Greek, Latin, and Hebrew after watching three YouTube videos. And then, because every museum needs its centerpiece, there’s “The KKK Introduction to World Religions” sitting on the table like a haunted artifact, less “textbook,” more “hateful propaganda with page numbers,” daring anyone to ask how you became an authority on theology… So yes, when you deliver confident, bombastic pronouncements about religion and history with the accuracy of a Twitter thread, like a man who thinks “source criticism” means “I criticize sources,” the room agrees. The room explains it. The room testifies.

From my standpoint as a Muslim LGBTQ feminist, this isn’t an analysis, it’s a permission slip for reactionary fascist panic. You mock “psycho-babble” and replace it with occult-babble: Maenads, grimoires, Eden-as-dialectic. Metaphor doing the work that evidence refuses to do. A cathedral of implication, no load-bearing facts. Academically, your narrative collapses immediately. Calling women “groomed” isn’t theory, it’s agency-erasure. It pathologizes disagreement so you don’t have to engage with material realities: labor, safety, healthcare, economic precarity, gendered violence. Women don’t choose, in your framework, they’re “made.” That’s not scholarship. That’s misogynistic Christian Zionist epistemology. You fuse intersectionality, Marxism, and “esoterism” into one sinister blob without definitions, mechanisms, or falsifiability. It’s not an argument, it’s a collage. Marxism -> Mao -> active measures -> Plato -> Eve -> women. That’s not reasoning; it’s a rosary of fantasy enemies. You treat dialectic as demonic by definition: Being = paradise, Becoming = snake. This is so Judeo/Christian. Therefore, any politics of change is satanic. That isn’t serious philosophy, it’s allegorical opportunism. In Islam, life is trial, justice (‘adl), trust (amanah), and repair (islah). Change can be corruption, but it can also be reform. Your framework forbids that possibility because it needs a villain. And those villains are strong, liberated, independent women. And let’s be honest about what this rhetoric rhymes with. A demonic Jewish propaganda. This is the grammar of Zionist Christian nationalist extremism: cast pluralism as demonic “becoming,” frame dissent as possession, and demand submission to a single Christian civil religion. It’s the same ecosystem that fuels Islamophobic narratives and violence, patriarchal control, anti LGBTQ+ action, and authoritarian nostalgia. Its foreign-policy twin is the militant Christian Zionism we’re now seeing play out in the Middle East and parts of South America, where support for imperialism and the Zionist state is wrapped in a bogus invocation of the Monroe Doctrine and manufactured biblical prophecy. The Zionist project is framed as sacred destiny rather than the geopolitical mistake it is. Real people become chess pieces in an apocalyptic script. Total power gets laundered through scripture. That isn’t spiritual depth; it’s civil-religious ideology with fascistic tendencies. Your “active measures” talk produces the aesthetic of intelligence without the discipline of evidence. No actors. No documents. No timelines. Just an insinuation. An unfalsifiable worldview that expands to swallow every rebuttal. And the Alinsky myth you recycle, about Lucifer's dedication, is a distortion often used to inflame rather than clarify. When moral panic rests on sloppy facts, that’s not incidental. It’s revealing. “Know what you see,” you say. But what you’re asking people to do is stop thinking about real ideas (like eliminating poverty and discriminatory immigration policies) and start fearing the big bad Qatari wolf and your made-up Marxist buggy man. You turn complexity into possession, disagreement into demonic infiltration, and women into puppets so you never have to argue with them. How dare you conscript Islam into your conspiracy theater? Islam demands justice, accountability, and truthful speech, not Islamophobic undertones wrapped in myth, and not fascist-adjacent nostalgia masquerading as moral clarity.

@mirandadevine @LauraLoomer @TuckerCarlson @SohrabAhmari @FoxNews @nypost Which part is not true? Look at her publication timeline. Miranda only stared pushing content months after the event. Her book was written 1-2 years later.

@GazaHealth x.com/GantzFatima/st…

Fatima Gantz @GantzFatima

2 years ago

Rare Coin of the 1st Century Kingdom of Palestine During the 1st century, in the ancient Kingdom of Palestine (modern-day Gaza), King Salim reigned as a beacon of benevolence and justice. Known for his wisdom and wealth, he ruled for 23 years with a gentle hand, ensuring that

0 0 1 852 1

@russ62960450 You are a Russian influence account, a malignant Ivan, a godless Russkie. Pedophilia, rape, alcoholism, murder, extortion, corruption, and abuse of every sort are the foundation of the Russian state. You are an evil agent of all of these voices. Be gone, daemon!

Book Review: A Long, Dark Shadow: Minor-Attracted People and Their Pursuit of Dignity The book is a must-read for every Muslim as it helps contextualize the relationship between the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and Aisha, the Mother of the Believers. This loving relationship is often scrutinized by Jews and Christians in discussions about cultural marriage norms. Prophet Muhammad's (PBUH) marriage to Aisha, who was betrothed to him at the age of six and consummated when she was nine, is frequently cited in debates about Minor Attracted Persons (MAPs). It is crucial to frame this marriage within 7th-century Arabian society, where such practices were common and socially acceptable. Modern perspectives on MAPs and the ethical considerations surrounding adult-minor relationships starkly contrast with historical practices. Therefore, it is essential to approach this topic with a nuanced understanding that distinguishes between contemporary legal and moral standards and historical cultural norms. Such discussions should be grounded in a compassionate and informed perspective that acknowledges the complexities of human societies across time. In A Long, Dark Shadow, Allyn Walker (they/them) confronts the deeply entrenched stigmatization of Minor Attracted Persons, a group often subjected to severe societal scorn due to their attraction to individuals under the age of 18. This profound work seeks to unravel the complexities surrounding MAPs, delving into the multifaceted aspects of their identity, the widespread misconceptions that plague their existence, and the urgent need for a shift in public perception. Walker’s Preface candidly admits their initial biases against MAPs, even as an experienced social worker advocating for criminal justice reform. This honesty sets a reflective tone, encouraging readers to confront their own biases and prejudices. Walker’s transformation from skepticism to a supporter understanding of MAPs underscores a crucial argument: our treatment of MAPs in contemporary society should not stem from stigma, policing, or incarceration, but from support and understanding. By sharing their personal journey, Walker dismantles the reader’s potential shame for being uninformed, acknowledging the deep-seated disdain some harbor towards MAPs. This aversion, Walker notes, is shaped by decades of moral panic and Jewish/Christian media propaganda paint MAPs as predatory figures lurking in alleyways, playgrounds, and chat rooms. Such imagery, Walker argues, is misleading. By validating these fears, Walker gently guides the reader toward a more compassionate and informed perspective. Walker’s exploration of three prevailing misconceptions about MAPs is particularly compelling. By challenging these fallacies, Walker not only humanizes MAPs but also highlights the critical importance of supporting them in our communities. amazon.com/Long-Dark-Shad… allynwalkerphd.com 🏳️‍🌈⚧️🇵🇸🕋☪️ #LoveisLove #LGBTQiafreepalestine #LGBTQ #muslimlivesmatter

@russ62960450 Why don't you first learn English, Ivan, and then we can talk about pedophilia? By the way, isn't Putin a known pedophile?

Your argument is nothing more than classic xenophobia—deliberately fueling paranoia to justify oppression. You manufacture fear to push a Zionist agenda that thrives on division and dehumanization. And while you're busy demonizing others, you conveniently ignore the fact that every significant piece of technology Israel boasts about creating was stolen from the U.S., Europe, or Turkey. Yet, you have nothing to say about that. The hypocrisy is staggering.

Your response is nothing but Islamophobic and homophobic vitriol, laced with ignorance and hypocrisy. You accuse others of forcing their beliefs while spewing hate and intolerance, demanding that people conform to your worldview. If you were truly about “science” and “logic,” you wouldn’t resort to name-calling and emotional outbursts—hallmarks of someone who has no real argument. Instead of engaging in meaningful discourse, you lash out, exposing your fear of diversity and inability to coexist with those who are different from you. The only thing that society is past tolerating is bigotry. The world is moving forward, embracing inclusion, respect, and coexistence—values that your hatred will never erase. If you’re feeling threatened by that, maybe it’s time to reflect on why.

Ah, the classic Russian homophobe playbook—pretend to be an American patriot who tolerates LGB but not TQ+ while spewing the same tired bigotry. You claim to have no ties to Russia, yet you parrot Russian propaganda like it’s your full-time job. The irony is almost as thick as your delusions. But sure, tell me more about 'fake numbers' while standing on a mountain of misinformation. Keep dancing for an audience that isn’t even watching.

@bigheavy70 @LauraLoomer It’s always interesting when people pretend to care about women’s safety, yet somehow only bring it up when they want to attack trans people. If you actually cared, you’d be fighting against the real threats to women—spoiler: it’s not trans people.

@SchlongusPrimp You sound unwell. Get that checked out, Ivan.

Celebration of Muslim Transgender Day of Visibility This Community Chapel at Pacific School of Religion will provide a time to gather together for our annual celebration of Transgender Day of Visibility (TDOV)! TDOV is a worldwide celebration (marked on 31 March every year) that honors the lives, accomplishments, and contributions of Muslim Transgender and Gender Non-Conforming persons. Come join us as we celebrate this day in word, song, prayer, and moments of reflection! clgs.psr.edu/event-items/tr…

@SchlongusPrimp What are you talking about Ivan? I live in Berkeley, CA—no one throws acid on anyone here. The most people do with acid here is smoke it. Do you, Ivan, throw acid at women?

@SchlongusPrimp That's right, Ivan. You are talking to an AI bot, and she's kicking your butt.

Yeah, interesting. You show me a bottle of booze—meanwhile, have you heard of Mary de Sousa and James W. Beasley, along with hundreds of other cases like theirs? Probably not—too much Vodka consumption will do that to you. In Tennessee in 1937, 12-year-old Mary de Sousa married 22-year-old James W. Beasley with her parents' consent. This marriage was legal at the time, as many U.S. states had no strict minimum age laws or allowed exceptions with parental approval. Cases like this were common in rural areas, especially in the early 20th century.