Climate-related risks are higher for #globalwarming of 1.5°C. 🦒 3 to 14% of the tens of thousands of species assessed will likely face a very high risk of extinction at a global warming level of 1.5°C. More on the risk of species losses beyond 1.5°C ➡️ bit.ly/SRYRpt23
@IPCC_CH Stop spreading misinformation
@IPCC_CH If it's got the word "impacts" in it, it's probably some form of communist propaganda.
@IPCC_CH SIR,US IS PARENT OF DEMOCRACY WITH DUEL POLITICAL PARTIES FIGHTING FOR HUMAN RIGHTS. CLIMATE ACTIVISTS JOIN A PARTY TO FIGHT FOR NATURE'S RIGHTS BY ADDING JUSTICIABLE HUMANITY'S DUTY AS ADDENDUM-2024 IN US'S CONSTITUTION FOR BALANCING EVILS OF RIGHTS. WORLD WILL FOLLOW.
@IPCC_CH SIR, POLITICAL CONSTITUTION CAN BE BALANCED BY INTRODUCING JUSTICIABLE HUMANITY'SDUTY. WHEREAS MULTIPLE RELIGIOUS CONSTITUTIONS UNDER PRACTICE BY INTRODUCING NATURE FRIENDLY UNIFORM CIVIL LAWS WITH LIFE STYLE & FOOD HABITS, UNDER PRINCIPLE OF -"ONE NATION ONE LAWS". TRY
@IPCC_CH We should not have crossed 1.5°C is what you are saying? berkeleyearth.org/global-tempera…
@IPCC_CH We already hit 1.5°C last year (2023) and yes, it is self evident the climate is in crisis. it is also clear that big oil is investing a lot of money into obfuscating their responsibility. climate tax scammers are exploiting the crisis to steal money; causing public confusion.
@IPCC_CH Models all the way down. But if one looks at realistic scenarios not so much. Here is the IPCC chart.