Julio Compactus @JCompactus

Joined December 2021

Tweets

2K
Followers

42
Following

453
Likes

2K

Julio Compactus @JCompactus

4 months ago

@Soerings Should Norway cancel its T26 given RN is no longer a serious parent Navy?

0 0 0 34 0

View Details

@GenGJenkinsRM @RoyalNavy We know how this ends - the drones will rot alongside a wharf meanwhile the few manned ships left will be smashed trying to complete the short of war tasking that requires a crew and which constitutes 80% plus of peacetime tasking for a warship.

0 1 1 152 0

View Details

Julio Compactus @JCompactus

4 months ago

@gadge4444 @Zaphod2042 @ifellonithonest completely different concept dimwit

0 0 0 6 0

View Details

Julio Compactus @JCompactus

4 months ago

@UKDefJournal We know how this ends - the drones will rot alongside a wharf meanwhile the few manned ships left will be smashed trying to complete the short of war tasking that requires a crew and which constitutes 80% plus of peacetime tasking for a warship.

0 0 0 48 0

View Details

Julio Compactus @JCompactus

4 months ago

@SwaledaleSailor @NavyLookout @thinkdefence We know how this ends - the drones will rot alongside a wharf meanwhile the few manned ships left will be smashed trying to complete the short of war tasking that requires a crew and which constitutes 80% plus of peacetime tasking for a warship.

0 0 1 119 0

View Details

Julio Compactus @JCompactus

4 months ago

@felix_sears @AlexLuck9 no one is building USV like this nor is any other Navy going down this road.

1 0 1 20 0

View Details

Julio Compactus @JCompactus

4 months ago

@JAParker29 @NavyLookout One of the many things that worries me is that all 'the short of war tasks' that warships do require personnel so that a tiny number of command ships will be smashed tempo wise.

1 0 2 77 0

View Details

Julio Compactus @JCompactus

4 months ago

@FennellJW Wont be exporting warships anymore.

1 0 0 85 0

View Details

Julio Compactus @JCompactus

4 months ago

@Varsevan its an insurance issue nothing to with UAV or warships

0 0 0 12 0

View Details

Julio Compactus @JCompactus

4 months ago

@MarksLarks given the cost structure of warship design presumably this means the drones will be absent sensors and weapons to achieve the savings

0 0 1 12 0

View Details

Julio Compactus @JCompactus

4 months ago

@defencewithac given the cost structure of warship design presumably this means the drones will be absent sensors and weapons to achieve the savings

1 0 0 8 0

View Details

Julio Compactus @JCompactus

4 months ago

@AC_NavalHistory The worst thing is that for all the risk any savings will be a chimera as crew sizes are falling rapidly and even the savings gained by unmanned will be offfset by the increase in tech complexity 😢

0 0 1 9 0

View Details

Julio Compactus @JCompactus

4 months ago

@FTusa284 absolute BS a much lower risk alternative is to use low risk tech to push min. manning to the max rather than high risk zero man. like the RAN plans 2 do after alot of analysis

0 0 0 20 0

View Details

Julio Compactus @JCompactus

4 months ago

@sagami_DDH142 I am willing to bet that it wont be cheap and will cost more than min/man assuming it even works

0 0 0 51 0

View Details

Julio Compactus @JCompactus

4 months ago

@FennellJW @garethrwallace RN has no CEC capability or experience it hasnt even mastered the basics unlike other western navies

1 0 0 27 0

View Details

Julio Compactus @JCompactus

4 months ago

@anshulsingh8326 @The_Banned_Vids 500 for things that never happened please

0 0 0 9 0

View Details

Julio Compactus @JCompactus

4 months ago

@TomCotterillX 31/32 hull is too small for the radar and power requirements

1 0 3 657 0

View Details

Julio Compactus @JCompactus

4 months ago

@DefenceGeek T31/32 is too small to be CCV

0 0 0 63 0

View Details

Julio Compactus @JCompactus

4 months ago

@AligooseQ @FennellJW The RAN just looked at this and that is the path they are going down. Same savings much lower risk.

0 0 0 2 0

View Details

Julio Compactus @JCompactus

4 months ago

@AligooseQ @FennellJW well said the whole thing is absolute BS a much lower risk alternative is to use low risk tech to push min. manning to the max rather than high risk zero man.