JasonC @JasonC00829648

@HarshEconomist @PeterSchiff Ah, and since when did a cheeky bit of eugenics ever hurt anybody?

@thebonezone66 @kelly_gem @davidleavitt Just pointing out, you can have what ever opinion you want about the matter itself, but David openly admitted he is only promoting what he is to take advantage of your clicks x.com/David_Leavitt/…

David Leavitt 🎲🎮🧙‍♂️🌈 @DavidLeavitt

4 years ago

@DefiantLs Thank you so much for the free advertising! Do you know how much money people are willing to spend on shoutouts and sponsored posts? If you enjoy #boardgames make sure to follow me!

2K 15 568 0 9

@Duoae @benzored @jbouie @tomscocca ... Supreme court is meant to be not representative. The legislature is meant to be representative. You can argue it is not "very" representative, but to say it is less so than the courts is ridiculous

@Questergirl @Cam456p @ebonylivv x.com/JasonC00829648… Right here is the link to the photos you chose not to look at, so you could live in your bubble where infanticide is ok. Again, this was a mainstream story, photos and all. But the photos were blurred everywhere else. And the police verified the photos

JasonC @JasonC00829648

4 years ago

@Questergirl @Cam456p @ebonylivv Yes, don't believe my lying eyes. Police response was "nothing to see here, no crime has been committed" liveaction.org/news/infant-bo…

0 0 0 0 0

@Questergirl @Cam456p @ebonylivv Oh, the old respond then block manoeuvre. I only linked that website, because all the mainstream media blurred the photos (and understandably so). This was a story from April, look it up for yourself. You did see the pictures, in the like I sent before, dont lie

@Questergirl @Cam456p @ebonylivv Sure, never said it wasnt. But just as murder is outlawed, but death by natural causes isnt, there is a moral difference. Also, the murder of the baby is more intrusive

@Questergirl @Cam456p @ebonylivv 100% of pregnancies, outside of rape cases are the responsibility of the woman and man who chose to perform that action. Or do you believe women arent capable of having responsibility over their own actions?

@Questergirl @Cam456p @ebonylivv Yes, don't believe my lying eyes. Police response was "nothing to see here, no crime has been committed" liveaction.org/news/infant-bo…

@Questergirl @Cam456p @ebonylivv No, I think there is a difference between a natural situation and coercing an unnatural surgery.

@Questergirl @Cam456p @ebonylivv 1% being rape. 99% being women who choose to have sex, hoping the natural consequence wont occur, and then when it does, believing it is their right to murder their child for convenience

@Questergirl @Cam456p @ebonylivv Do you think a male should be able to force a woman to have an abortion if he does not want the child? If he does not want to/cant look after or support the child? If not, why not? If it is just a clump of cells, why should the woman have an attachment to it?

@Questergirl @Cam456p @ebonylivv Yes, but because it is mandating an intrusive surgery...

@Questergirl @Cam456p @ebonylivv Women in 99% of cases do decide for themselves. The left over 1% is at least debatable from a pro choice perspective, but not the 99% that result from their own decision making

@Questergirl @Cam456p @ebonylivv Our free healthcare is the most inefficient monstrosity you have ever seen. It was falling apart pre covid and now it is in complete ruins. Granted, your healthcare system is a shambles too, but for a very different reason than "not having it subsidised". Happy to explain further

@Questergirl @Cam456p @ebonylivv Because they performed an act they knew could result in the creation of life, and just because they arent happy about it doesnt then give them the right to kill it