It is impossible to overstate the significance of the DBS judgement against me & their subsequent admission that they may have erred in putting me on the children's barred list because that was used to support the judgement to dismiss my unfair dismissal. They undermined my hearing.
@KevsTribulation In light of the Cass report, it could now be argued that Mr Lister was acting in the best interest of the student, since affirming 'social transition' may directly lead to medical interventions which are harmful; namely puberty blockers. To seek to do good is not discrimination.
@KevsTribulation It is absolutely appalling! I have and will continue to support your legal appeals. 🫂
@KevsTribulation Keep strong Kevin, you are in the right here,
@KevsTribulation DBS decision to bar was afforded little weight - merely ref in 'Subsequent Events' & in 1 sentence of 1 para (of 68) - 'The fact that that decision [to dismiss] has been endorsed to some extent by the DBS decision assisted the Respondent'. Doesn't undermine given evidence heard.
@KevsTribulation "New College applies these principles beyond the scope of the Equality Act 2010 to all those with gender variance, some of whom may not permanently identify as male or female.” It is impossible to comply with a 'rule' where someone who may be 'male' on Monday and 'Female' on Tue.
@KevsTribulation The injustice here is infuriating, you deserved a LOT better. Thoughts with you.