KnowledgeWorthy @KnowledgeWorthy

Supporting #Scicomm & #SocScicomm. Compare taste in #knowledge with friends, colleagues, & acquaintances. We support #peerreview, #smartcities, & #openscience! Joined May 2017

Tweets

618
Followers

33
Following

97
Likes

162

KnowledgeWorthy @KnowledgeWorthy

9 years ago

@elonmusk

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

KnowledgeWorthy @KnowledgeWorthy

9 years ago

@elonmusk Of course, our website could be re-coded for news articles instead of the 4+ million research abstracts we had up... [3/3]

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

KnowledgeWorthy @KnowledgeWorthy

9 years ago

@elonmusk Our beta was essentially a public rating system for *research* to help [a] reduce the crap research out there; and [b] help researchers connect at conferences via shared location. Our UX is/was similar but more dynamic than the old-school hotornot website... 2/3

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

KnowledgeWorthy @KnowledgeWorthy

9 years ago

@elonmusk @elonmusk Gotta admit we're disappointed... We tweeted to you about essentially this idea back when we beta-launched this past November and you ignored us. We took our site off a couple weeks ago, but here's the 1-pager: scireach.org/listing/knowle…

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

KnowledgeWorthy @KnowledgeWorthy

9 years ago

@Sci_Hub sci-hub.tw is down!

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

KnowledgeWorthy @KnowledgeWorthy

9 years ago

@kirkenglehardt OMG. The system that has been created has no concept of efficiency...

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

Kirk Englehardt 📸 @kirkenglehardt

9 years ago

Scientists and Journalists Square Off Over Covering Science and ‘Getting it Right’ ow.ly/Abag30iRLbf #scicomm

1 2 0 0 0

View Details

KnowledgeWorthy @KnowledgeWorthy

9 years ago

@girlandkat Great to see that Japan is holding this... we can only dream that the same will be done soon here in Seoul... :)

0 0 1 0 0

View Details

KnowledgeWorthy @KnowledgeWorthy

9 years ago

Anybody have ideas about how effective #scicomm would differ from any kind of effective #socscicomm? Or why #socscicomm gets so little airtime?

0 0 1 0 0

View Details

KnowledgeWorthy @KnowledgeWorthy

9 years ago

@irenehames @rburdine1 @PEERe_REVIEW Modifying pre-pub peer review can fix some issues, but those fixes won't dramatically affect relevance of research for society. Can't we work on a post-pub peer review system that better connects researchers to societal needs, & increase the incentives for usefulness to society?

0 0 2 0 0

View Details

KnowledgeWorthy @KnowledgeWorthy

9 years ago

@C0PE If anybody needs data to do research on post-publication review, we can offer the platform. Our beta is live. Contact us at [email protected].

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

Michael Willis @mwillispub

9 years ago

If you have any interest at all in research into #peerreview, #peere2018 is one to watch this week: @PEERe_REVIEW conference, Rome, 7-9 March

0 6 7 0 0

View Details

KnowledgeWorthy @KnowledgeWorthy

9 years ago

@Knowledgeworthy visits @colderbaek and the office of @pluto_network on Friday. What are the problems and trends that deserve the most attention by today's existing startups in #peerreview, #scicomm, #citizenscience and #openscience? Help RT!

0 0 1 0 0

View Details

KnowledgeWorthy @KnowledgeWorthy

9 years ago

@2020science By cynicism I think you mean non-romanticism or a-romanticism. :)

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

KnowledgeWorthy @KnowledgeWorthy

9 years ago

@webmz_ @CocoNell2 @500womensci That's precisely why this recent ongoing #whatIdoin6words campaign is a bit silly. Those 6 words are almost always jargon-filled, and don't reach beyond the relatively small academic circles.

0 0 1 0 0

View Details

KnowledgeWorthy @KnowledgeWorthy

9 years ago

@2020science At first I thought you forgot the set of people that are trying to do something that's actually SCALABLE in #scicomm... and then I realized that maybe you did include that circle and I just don't have my magnifying glass with me to see it...

1 0 2 0 0

View Details

Tracy Herbert @HerbertLTracy

9 years ago

Terms that have different meanings for scientists and the public. (Reference: physicstoday.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/PT…) #scicomm

0 5 9 0 0

View Details

KnowledgeWorthy @KnowledgeWorthy

9 years ago

@saguaromelee @julien_hering Ah. I meant to say: essentially re-write the abstract in layman's terms, with roughly the same number of words.

1 0 1 0 0

View Details

Julien Hering PhD @julien_hering

9 years ago

As it Becomes a Science Superpower, China Bets on #openaccess for its Global Data Sharing and Research Initiatives openscience.com/as-it-becomes-… via @OpenScienceNews

0 1 1 0 0

View Details

KnowledgeWorthy @KnowledgeWorthy

9 years ago

@lsgardiner @iamscicomm I think maybe the easiest way to get something like haikus out there is to reach college students and high school students first -- kinda the old "Facebook" strategy, if you will. And then expand the audience from there...