Lyanaky @Lyanaky

anthropologist researcher #JeSoutiensZemmour independent.academia.edu/MariaVivod wherever i may roam Joined November 2008

Tweets

1K
Followers

137
Following

438
Likes

5K

Lyanaky @Lyanaky

6 years ago

@EuroSandor @vonderleyen devil-worshiping....?

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

Lyanaky @Lyanaky

6 years ago

@fbieber Sir, You have confused the notions of 'criticism' and 'legitimizing'. The moment you asked if a research is 'legitimize' you wandered off from being scientist. (ceracemo se mi jos)

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

Lyanaky @Lyanaky

6 years ago

This is how the establishment decides what is 'legitimate' research and what is not. What is 'acceptable' when doing science and what is not.

1 0 1 0 0

View Details

Lyanaky @Lyanaky

6 years ago

my statement of facebook, a reaction to florian biber's censorship:

1 0 0 0 0

View Details

Lyanaky @Lyanaky

6 years ago

@fbieber Sir, It's an honor to be censored from you. Thank you for this asset.

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

Lyanaky @Lyanaky

6 years ago

@fbieber Sir, You allowing yourself to play some kind of ‘authority’ in scientific domain which is not yours. Is this enough for you? Aren’t you feeling a bit of shame?

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

Lyanaky @Lyanaky

6 years ago

@fbieber Are you sitting on some pedestal which enables you to judge whose research is acceptable? Stop calling out publicly scientists whose research is unpleasing/illegitimate/unfitting to you.

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

@fbieber Sir, I would be ashamed to venture into a scientific field of research which is not my own. The last time I’ve checked you were a political scientists and a historian. Stick to your field. Leave the psychologists/behaviouralists their own.

0 0 1 0 0

View Details

Lyanaky @Lyanaky

6 years ago

@fbieber Attack the biased research. Make sure it’s in writing and well argumented. Attack it’s methodology, attack it’s data, attack the used biblio and references. Do it. IN WRITING. Like decent scholars do.

0 0 2 0 0

View Details

Lyanaky @Lyanaky

6 years ago

@fbieber Sir, It is a custom in the world of scholars to refute all suspicious research and publication. This is done in writing according to the rules of each discipline. Naming people, calling them out publicly for their research in front of the crowd is slightly said distasteful.

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

Lyanaky @Lyanaky

6 years ago

@mynamefelicity Madame, If fighting for objective, unrestrained and free science make me a racist, i shall wear my 'scarlet letter' with proud and honor.

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

Lyanaky @Lyanaky

6 years ago

@fbieber Those who decide shaming colleagues for doing research on non ‘legitimate’ topics, should provide a list of ‘allowed’ topics. Like f.i. Index Librorum Prohibitorum?

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

Lyanaky @Lyanaky

6 years ago

@fbieber there is no 'racist' when doing research. just 'research'. if one chooses to refute some research looking suspicious, he/she has to do it in writing according to the rules of the scientific discipline.