Whilst I understand people's negative feedback on twitter about certain stuff they've seen with the FFXIV DT but THIS is how you compile data as feedback, doing god's work over on the JP section. (this is just a tiny fraction of what's in the thread)
Thread can be found here: forum.square-enix.com/ffxiv/threads/…
Lots of people replying with "EN have a thread like this" "EN are ignored" but you prove the point I somewhat try to make by not linking the actual sources? Ironic isn't it?
@MysteriousRyan the JP are so much nicer about their feedback than the ENG people are, OMG. NA and EU are like "THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE FIX IT" and JP is over there like "If you could adjust this, I would really appreciate it." No wonder SE listens to JP feedback and not NA/EU.
@MysteriousRyan Gamma correction will solve a lot of issues, btw. As for the colors, Squeenix said the colors will be off for some and that's why they will be giving Fantasias to everyone for free. Light and shadows in 7.0 will work different so color saturation will work different.
@MysteriousRyan Check this thread - not everyone is as analytical to be sure, but when I glanced through I saw a lot of discussion about things like the editing of nose angles and eyebrow shapes and the like with diagrams. I’m sure JP and EN both have mixed results forum.square-enix.com/ffxiv/forums/6…
@MysteriousRyan Some of this is also disingenuous as fuck as the benchmark seems to have character lighting set to max, and a lot of what they're preceiving as loss of shadows and details are just the result of the game finally having some bounce lighting again.
@MysteriousRyan I am baffled. We would legitimately be lost without them, that's the most thorough feedback I've ever seen 😂
@MysteriousRyan I appreciate people like this. I just want the glint back, so my midlander doesn't look like she's catatonic. The darkening of the top half of the eyeball is very distracting on every character.