Nicolas M @NiccrowDev

Desarrollador de software, gamer, Cuervo, y amante del rock, el reggae y el SKA. Buenos Aires, Argentina Joined January 2012

Tweets

3K
Followers

87
Following

210
Likes

1K

Nicolas M @NiccrowDev

2 weeks ago

@nutricionjavier Pensé que era cosa mia, me calenté y apague todo, a la mierda

0 0 3 66 0

View Details

Nicolas M @NiccrowDev

4 weeks ago

@Colapinto_news No voy a mentir, es una lastima pero parte de mi lo disfrutó cagarle la carrera al sorete de Gasly.

7 3 114 2K 1

View Details

Así que podés discutir una carrera. Podés criticar un error. Podés decir que otro piloto te gusta más. Pero hay una cosa que ya no podés decir: “Nadie en la Fórmula 1 confía en Colapinto.” Porque alguien puso la firma. Caso cerrado. Nos vemos en la próxima carrera. 🇦🇷

0 0 0 22 0

View Details

Nicolas M @NiccrowDev

2 months ago

Renovó porque la gente que tiene millones de dólares, cientos de empleados y un auto de Fórmula 1 en juego decidió que Franco Colapinto les sirve arriba de ese auto.

1 0 0 30 0

View Details

Nicolas M @NiccrowDev

2 months ago

-¿Renovó porque realmente se lo ganó? -¿Querés respuestas? -¡Quiero la verdad! -¡VOS NO PODES MANEJAR LA VERDAD! ¿Querés la verdad? La verdad es que mientras vos contabas cada trompo, cada clasificación y cada décima perdida para explicar por qué “no merece estar en Fórmula 1”

1 0 0 17 0

View Details

Nicolas M @NiccrowDev

3 months ago

@GxldeOnti No es nuestra culpa a que ustedes no les guste el fútbol. A nosotros si, por eso lo vemos y lo jugamos siempre que podemos.

0 0 0 8 0

View Details

LawVS @LawVSX

3 months ago

Wow! #F1 #BelgianGP x.com/vivof1/status/…

17 77 2K 32K 27

View Details

Sudanalytics @sudanalytics_

4 months ago

Mirá cómo la aguantó Lautaro, ufff. 🚬

76 1K 16K 264K 448

View Details

🇦🇷 Selección Argentina ⭐⭐⭐ @Argentina

4 months ago

🏆 #FIFAWorldCup Ganó todo, lo logró todo, pero esas lágrimas demuestran que su hambre de gloria y su amor por esta camiseta no tienen techo 🥹 ¡Gracias por sentirlo así, Capitán! 👑🐐

3K 12K 62K 1.1M 944

View Details

Nicolas M @NiccrowDev

4 months ago

@7uanF Si nos odian diganlo abiertamente, dejen de buscar excusas, o buscate un repo para eso. Va con onda.

0 0 0 67 0

View Details

Nicolas M @NiccrowDev

4 months ago

@NetNezva Bastante ingenuo pero válido.

0 0 1 39 0

View Details

Nicolas M @NiccrowDev

4 months ago

@sunriselalisa Y eso que no les cantamos "mira mira mira, sacale una foto..."

0 0 0 2K 1

View Details

Nicolas M @NiccrowDev

4 months ago

@victorabadf1 Pero Victor, este es un problema de la FIA de hace mucho. No es de ESTE reglamento. Hay muchas cosas que mejorar. La F1 es inmirable hace bastante, que el árbol no nos tape el bosque. Para mi las baterías son totalmente secundarias en este punto, hay problemas muchísimos peores.

0 0 1 630 0

View Details

Mark Granza @markgranza

4 months ago

The problem here is 'legalism', not scientism. Forget whether the player's hair touched the ball or not. Here's what the offside rule was originally created for: a striker breaks through the defense early or purposely stays behind, finds himself with ten yards of open grass between him and the last defender and only the goalkeeper in front. The rule is one of the oldest in the game because the people who first played it saw something clearly unfair about it, i.e., an advantage that doesn't require skill to create, which, if allowed, would have made the game unwatchable. The problem is that over time people began to conflate the advantage aspect with the mechanics of detecting it, especially since TV programs in the 70s began showing slow-motion replays of gray-area calls over and over in post-match analysis to keep football fans endlessly arguing and their ratings high. This is how you get, for instance, cases in which a forward who times his run perfectly, catching the defender off guard (often running in the opposite direction) and then scoring, is still called "unfair" by other fans because his shoulder or nose or whatever was ahead when the pass occurred, despite the fact that if it would have been behind, if anything, it'd have given him even *more* time to score. It's the same thing that often happens in court. A law is written to stop a particular harm, then lawyers spend decades arguing over the exact wording until the very harm it was meant to stop gets almost forgotten and the letter becomes the law. Nobody watching Croatia's disallowed goal possibly believes that the Croatian player’s touch (even if it happened) created an advantage for his teammate. The ball clearly reaches the latter thanks to the (non-deliberate, thus irrelevant) deflection off the Portugal player. But nobody is thinking about the purpose of the rule anymore, only the technicality of its wording. Hence scientism, which is downstream of legalism in this context and eventually convinced the entire sport that it needed sensors inside the football to detect a hair touch because... why not?

Robin Monotti @robinmonotti

4 months ago

Croatia's disallowed goal highlights scientism's core ideology that "data" is truth: but it is simply not. It is obvious to the naked eye that the ball direction is not altered by the player's head. That is truth. The blip on the sensor could simply be put there later, it could

359 905 7K 870K 733

74 348 3K 287K 646

View Details

Nicolas M @NiccrowDev

4 months ago

Se está poniendo rara la eurocopa

0 0 1 11 0

View Details

Miguel Ángel Durán @midudev

4 months ago

¡Histórico! Nuevo método HTTP para el estándar. Se llama QUERY y es una alternativa a GET y POST ✓ Como GET, no modifica el estado del recurso ✓ Como POST, puedes usar el body para la petición ✓ Puedes pasarle un JSON y cachear la respuesta Acaba de pasar a ser "Proposed Standard"