Enfantshustle @Ownerthoughts

🟩BTC: $79809 +4.6% 🟩ETH: $2555 +4.4% 🟩SOL: $108 +8.0% 🟩BNB: $759 +4.7% 🟩XRP: $1.352 +4.2% 🟩HYPE: $91 +11.2% 🟩SUI: $0.808 +11.4% 🟩ADA: $0.217 +8.8% 🟩LTC: $56 +5.6% 🟩TRX: $0.338 +1.3% 🟩GRAM: $1.373 +3.3% 🟩DOGE: $0.0867 +7.1% 🟩ARB: $0.212 +29.2% 🟩AVAX: $8.102 +7.1% 🟩SHIB: $0.00000543 +7.3% 🟩PEPE: $0.00000378 +7.1%

Michael Saylor @saylor

6 hours ago

Making ₿elievers.

439 538 6K 246K 128

0 1 2 34 0

View Details

Enfantshustle @Ownerthoughts

4 hours ago

@blknoiz06 But where can I find such people

0 0 2 11 0

View Details

Enfantshustle @Ownerthoughts

6 hours ago

@zenkaixbt To whoever is reading this: know that you are next.

0 0 0 1 0

View Details

Enfantshustle @Ownerthoughts

6 hours ago

"Guaranteed Returns" Is Not Marketing. It's Mathematical Proof of Fraud Goliath Ventures promised 1,600 clients: your money goes into DeFi liquidity pools, you earn a stable 3% to 10% per month, principal is safe. The result: not a single dollar entered a single pool. Where did that $397 million go? Let's break it down — this is precise scam engineering: $87 million → payouts to early clients, to create the illusion of "I'm actually earning" $174 million → payouts to sales agents and insiders as recruitment commissions $48 million → personal spending by CEO Christopher Delgado: mansions, cars, jewelry $21 million → corporate cards, including $4.9 million on round-the-world travel and $2.9 million on luxury and concierge services $838,000 → in September 2025, a yacht was purchased with client money A "DeFi liquidity provider" bought a yacht. That's not industry practice. That's physical evidence of fraud. The scheme held up for three years not because it was technically brilliant, but because it hit the core cognitive hole of crypto investors dead center: people treat "decentralized finance" as a source of income, not a source of risk. Real DeFi liquidity pool yield comes from trading fees. It is not a magic money printer. Any "DeFi product" promising "stable 3–10% monthly with guaranteed principal" can mathematically only work one way: paying early participants with later participants' money. That's the definition of a Ponzi. That's not an opinion. Goliath even fabricated its own "compliance." The company announced a partnership with a "regulatory compliance firm" — and that firm was owned and controlled by Goliath's own compliance officer. That firm issued an "independent audit" in August 2025, claiming Goliath held at least 115% of client funds and could cover all withdrawal requests. When an investigative journalist began publicly calling Goliath a Ponzi scheme in September 2025, Goliath's lawyers sent a cease-and-desist letter threatening a defamation suit and stated the company "has always been a legitimate business, not a Ponzi scheme." And then, on September 22, Goliath actually sued the journalist. Two months later, in November 2025, the company told clients: withdrawals are delayed, we're waiting on a "third-party forensic audit." The CFTC complaint states it plainly: no audit was being conducted. Goliath had simply run out of money. Christopher Delgado pleaded guilty in June 2026. Federal prosecutors say at least $400 million flowed into Goliath, and Delgado admitted to investor losses of at least **$250 million**. He agreed to forfeit: 8 properties, 11 vehicles, 30 watches, more than 50 luxury bags and wallets, at least 29 pieces of jewelry, plus bank and crypto accounts. Sentencing date: October 21, 2026. To anyone still looking at "high-yield DeFi products": Goliath is not an isolated case. It's a template. Every element of it — wrapping it in a "liquidity pool," guaranteeing principal, commissions for sellers, fake audits, suing doubters — can be copied. Next time you see "X% monthly, guaranteed principal, DeFi liquidity mining," remember this number: That $838,000 for the yacht came from clients' ETH deposits. That's not yield. That's your principal.