Fact the jury were deliberating for so long before the trial was ultimately aborted shows there was a case, as supported by the DPP. How then did the AFP get it so wrong? And how did the @australian get a direct line into the inner workings of the AFP?
Fact the jury were deliberating for so long before the trial was ultimately aborted shows there was a case, as supported by the DPP. How then did the AFP get it so wrong? And how did the @australian get a direct line into the inner workings of the AFP?
@Peter_Fox59 @australian Or alternatively, the fact that the jury deliberated for so long shows there was reasonable doubt.
@Peter_Fox59 @australian The fact the jury deliberated for so long means that they didn't understand what Reasonable Doubt is, not that there was enough evidence to prosecute.
@Peter_Fox59 @australian no the long deliberation meant it would be a hung jury.
@Peter_Fox59 @australian Australia seems to be a very accidental country ... no, not corrupt at any point, just accidental. In any number of areas ...
@Peter_Fox59 @australian Agreed, key question is relationship between AFP and Murdoch. This must be exposed. #auspol
@Peter_Fox59 @australian And how did Ms Higgins’ counselling records get ‘accidentally’ shared with Mr Lehrmann’s lawyers?