RISD-P @RISDDFW

@tomreiai PDF

R.I.P 9 to 5. You don't need a job anymore. A simple 90-page PDF can make you $8,400 per month from anywhere in the world. I usually charge $199 for this. But for the next 24 hours, I’m sharing my entire strategy for free. To get it... Comment “PDF” and I’ll DM it to you. Must follow to receive @tomreiai

What’s actually going on in Ukraine is that there is a massive incentive difference between the elites and the people. The former have grown very rich off the hundreds of billions flowing to Ukraine, while the latter’s children are conscripted to die in trenches.

@robertsmith_ai Send

46 Websites that'll pay you $90/hr for data entry jobs: I have prepared a list of 46 Websites that'll pay you $45/hr for data entry jobs With Just a Smartphone or Laptop and Internet. For absolutely FREE: To get it: 1. Follow Me 2. Like and Retweet 3. Reply with “send”

Here's the story of how I became a #PEPTIDE MILLIONAIRE. My name is Logan Shippy, and I own a company called Medovation. We control the supply chain. From raws > finished goods. Let me explain... We supply compounding pharmacies / labs raw materials (API). Our team exclusively sources API from FDA inspected / CGMP manufacturers - like Genohope - which is on the FDA green list. We do not repackage or re-label. All API comes in the original manufacturers packaging to ensure sterility and minimize liability. We also specialize in client acquisition. In total we've onboarded 1,000+ clinics to our partner pharmacies / labs. Helping those clinics get access to the highest quality peptides at the best prices. Other things we offer... Telemedicine technology (doctor network), and high risk payment processing. We've built an ecosystem of value for people looking to take advantage of the peptide revolution.

there is no catch and that scares me Elon Musk posted an idea that hit 27 million views: "stop building startups. buy boring internet real estate and let bots run it" that's literally what Grok Bot does now. the whole setup costs $0 on top of the sub: → create a bot, name it Mogul → tell it to find one boring niche people search every day (it reads X and reddit complaints in real time, it's grok) → it builds a small directory site on its own computer and ships one useful page every night → it negotiates affiliate and referral deals itself, by email, in your name → publishing runs on a routine. telegram sends you the money reports → month one: traffic. month three: the first $217. it never stops after that your laptop stays shut. the site grows anyway every page is a tiny employee that works forever. it compounds like rent some of them run 3 sites each and haven't opened a single one. they don't post about it, and now you know why every month you wait, someone's bot ships another 30 pages into the niche you would've picked full playbook below bookmark this before someone takes your niche

I'M OFFICIALLY A $BTC BILLIONAIRE! 🙏 As I promised, I want to change someone’s life—giving away 1 #Bitcoin (~$85,000) to one lucky winner by tomorrow! Like, RT, follow and comment 'DONE' to enter. Winner announced in 48h! 🚀

Next year, I will give one of my SpaceX shares to every kid in America. This will be the first of many.

Exactly what I predicted has happened

X Freeze @XFreeze

a week ago

Elon laid out a path to peace between Ukraine and Russia back in October 2022, and he was attacked for it by almost everyone In November 2023, he explained to Lex Fridman why he had proposed peace: “a lot of people dying for basically almost no changes in land,” with an entire

1K 2K 14K 3.7M 2K

A retired NASA engineer who had worked on the Space Shuttle program for 25 years was hired by SpaceX at age 62. He described the first week as the most disorienting experience of his professional life. At NASA, a design change required 3 meetings, 2 committees, a review board, and 6 to 18 months of documentation. At SpaceX, his new supervisor said "if it works, build it. If it doesn't, change it by Friday." He sat at his desk after the first day and called his wife. He told her he felt like a man who had been swimming with ankle weights for 25 years and someone just cut them off. He could move. He could decide. He could build something in the morning and test it in the afternoon. The constraint that he had accepted as the nature of aerospace engineering turned out to be the nature of bureaucracy. Within 6 months he had contributed to more design iterations than he had completed in his last 5 years at NASA. Not because he was working harder. Because the time between having an idea and testing the idea collapsed from months to hours. The same brain. The same knowledge. A different operating system. He described a specific moment where he proposed a modification to a Raptor engine component. At NASA, the proposal would have entered a queue. At SpaceX, the modification was machined by the end of the day and tested by the following morning. He watched his idea become a physical object in 18 hours. At NASA, 18 hours would not have been enough to schedule the first meeting to discuss whether to schedule a meeting. He told an interviewer: "I didn't get smarter when I went to SpaceX. I got faster. The intelligence was always there. The system was in the way." The difference between SpaceX and NASA is not talent. NASA has extraordinary talent. The difference is the time between a thought and a test. SpaceX compresses it. NASA elongates it. The same engineer produces 10x more at SpaceX than at NASA because the bottleneck was never the engineer. It was the meetings about the meetings about the work.

Gurgavin highlighting something important ➡️ This is the rationale for momentum investing (different time frame) PS: Best performing macro asset in 3 Q26 was $ETH … what will lead in the final quarter of 2026? …hmmmm 🤔

GURGAVIN @gurgavin

2 weeks ago

1/ I WONDERED WHAT HAPPENS IF YOU JUST BUY THE BEST PERFORMING STOCK FROM THE YEAR BEFORE AND DO IT EVERY SINGLE YEAR SO I BACKTESTED IT GOING BACK 15 YEARS STARTING WITH $100 IN 2012: END RESULTS S&P 500 → $800 LAST YEAR'S WINNER → $176,114

373 437 8K 2.4M 12K

Kennedy Vows to Reform Vaccine Injury Compensation Program themahapac.com/post/kennedy-v…

💯%

Goshawk Trades @GoshawkTrades

2 weeks ago

bill ackman on why large, boring companies now drop 25% in a day, something he says almost never happened when he started: "a quarter of every american business, plus or minus, is owned by some combination of vanguard, state street and northern trust. when you shrink the float

124 562 6K 1.3M 5K

@NavellierGrowth Dear Louis, we’ve enjoyed and respected your commentary for years and look forward to your ongoing presence here on X.

I don't recommend anyone scramble to move their funds to new wallets today. But we should take the risks to cryptography from AI-accelerated math seriously, and minimize our exposure to not just quantum-vulnerable cryptography, but also potentially AI-vulnerable cryptography. The core new area of risk from this viewpoint is, unfortunately, ML-DSA / FHE / lattices. (and it's also another reason, along with quantum, why ECDSA might fall even faster than expected, hence the "fresh address" recommendation) So far most people have been in the mode of thinking "elliptic curves broken, hashes safe, lattices safe". But there is a good chance that the concrete security of lattices will take serious hits from the next two years of AI math. The basic threat model is: factoring is something that naively takes 2^(n/2) time, but over decades smart people have found and optimized number field sieves, and degraded that to 2^O(n^(1/3)), which is why RSA keys and signatures need to be ~400 bytes (and not 64 bytes). What if there are skeletons in the closet like that, both for elliptic curves and lattices, that we are simply not smart enough to discover - but bots soon will be? This is a major part of the reason why for the past year ethereum's lean roadmap has been going in the "hash-only" direction: no lattices, no ML-DSA, no Falcon, no lattice-based commitments inside ZK proofs, etc. Signatures in lean ethereum are all hash-based, either WOTS or SPHINCS-. For signatures and proofs, we already know how to go hash-only. The bigger challenge is for *public-key encryption* - and this goes far beyond blockchains. Secure communication, anonymizing protocols, lots of things need public-key encryption. And unfortunately there are long-standing mathematical theorems showing why public-key encryption cannot be done with hashes alone. You have to have some kind of trapdoor object that has at least one form of usable "structure" - either group theory (incl. isogenies) or lattices or code-based or potentially in the future even more newfangled and spooky things (local mixing?). But for anything that has structure, you should assume that AI will make at least some progress in breaking that structure. Here, one reasonable inference is that if you want to make something plausibly long-term secure, multiply the key sizes by 10. To me that's a very plausible world and something not at all extreme to predict. If AI will bring us 50 years of math in 2 years, then that 50 years of math may very plausibly include a "naive factoring -> GNFS" level of improvement to our ability to break lattices. In that world, lattices will still exist, but they will have to be significantly bigger to guarantee the same level of safety. And at those new larger sizes, hash-based constructions will beat lattice-based constructions on concrete efficiency in every use case where hash-based constructions are possible at all. Theoretically, of course it's possible that hashes are broken too (eg. P = NP would imply that). But I think P = NP is very unlikely. And intuitively, it's much more likely that a mathematical object has exactly no exploitable structure (like hashes are intended to), than that a mathematical object has exactly ~3 forms of exploitable structure (for elliptic curves: associativity, Schoof, pairings) and not some secret fourth form of structure we have not yet discovered that greatly degrades its security (for elliptic curves, ECDLP and pairing security). Similar for LWE, SVP, RLWE and the zoo of lattice problems. For this reason, we do not yet see any reason to worry and start padding the byte size of hashes (if we start to worry more, we would pad the round count first before doing anything to the byte size). Concrete TLDR, my own personal views: * Hash-based > lattice-based, in those situations where hash-based is possible at all * For anything lattice-based, be much more paranoid on param sizes. Remember that blockchains are only a small portion of the cryptography story; this point goes far beyond blockchains and applies to eg. access to websites, secure messaging, Tor / VPNs ... * For privacy protocols, strongly favor NOT putting encrypted notes onchain. Instead, send them offchain through some third-party mechanism. * If it's not difficult for you, keeping your funds in addresses which have not yet been used to make a transaction is a good idea. If it's easy for you, do it. **But be careful about migrations; I personally have lost more money in botched migrations than I have lost in all hacks combined**. * For multisig wallets, doing confirmations offchain is better than onchain, because this way the signatures of signer wallets do not get exposed to the public, so if ECDSA falls to AI much faster than expected, at least the multisig "gracefully degrades" to a 1-of-1 where the 1 is whoever was gathering the signatures - a much better place to be than "anyone can take the money" firefly.social/post/x/2107837…

@JayBisen473370 Senf

@fundstrat A convincing transparent simulation could prove the point either way. Consider producing it.

@fundstrat ETH protocol has the supply/demand issue built in. Why would anyone bet on reaching $250k (ur vision) when fees need to stay low to justify using it? SW engineered supply/demand vs real market forces trump the investment thesis plus the inherent NFT security risk by design.

R.I.P 9 to 5. You don't need a job anymore. A simple 90-page PDF can make you $8,400 per month from anywhere in the world. I usually charge $199 for this. But for the next 24 hours, I’m sharing my entire strategy for free. To get it... Comment “PDF” and I’ll DM it to you. Must follow to receive @coder_amaxaAi