Ramiro Hum-Sah @RamiroHumSah

Science enthusiast, mostly interested in string theory and black hole physics. Joined November 2013

Tweets

5K
Followers

574
Following

915
Likes

3K

Tetsuo @tetsuoai

a year ago

x.com/i/article/1813…

24 234 2K 806K 2K

Very excited to finally have this paper out! Elliott Gesteau, Matilde Marcolli, and I repurposed ideas from perturbative renormalization to study the Factorization Paradox, and found a symmetry group controlling topology change arxiv.org/abs/2407.20324

4 13 100 6K 28

Jake McNamara @jmcnamara18

2 years ago

These two new papers arxiv.org/abs/2303.13585 and arxiv.org/abs/2303.14203 paint an absolutely amazing picture: all the stringy T and S dualities between 10d supergravities are derived from the bottom-up using Swampland principles!

0 7 27 4K 10

Ramiro Hum-Sah @RamiroHumSah

9 months ago

Finiteness and the Emergence of Dualities arxiv.org/abs/2412.03640

1 0 5 190 1

Will Kinney @WKCosmo

a year ago

One of the strangest coincidences in physics is the fact that Newtonian fluid dynamics in three dimensions is exactly equivalent to a scalar field theory in FOUR dimensions, with a Lorentzian signature metric. I know of no intuitive reason for this to be true, but it is.

88 107 1K 199K 830

Swamp Thing @StringSwamp

a year ago

arxiv.org/abs/2407.20324

0 5 17 3K 6

Kirito (e/acc) 🏴‍☠️ @bronzeagepapi

a year ago

“I am not really doing research, just trying to cultivate myself.” — Alexander Grothendieck

1 3 23 2K 1

😡fermion, PhD @angryfermion

a year ago

i asked ChatGPT to generate what a scientist would tweet and it wrote: "by age 40 you should have realized life is meaningless and that the only knowledge that matters is mathematics"

9 39 624 29K 36

Physics Latam @PhysicsLatam

a year ago

Mini course: Current Status on Black Holes and Information Paradox - Suvrat Raju (@ictstifr) 5 Lectures youtube.com/watch?v=Fi2QiJ…

1 12 30 2K 7

Download Image

Topology Fact @TopologyFact

a year ago

Exotic spheres, or why 4-dimensional space is a crazy place plus.maths.org/content/richar…

2 24 98 8K 22

Jake McNamara @jmcnamara18

2 years ago

The best cure to string theory criticism is learning string theory

9 17 199 42K 12

arXiv math.AT Algebraic Topology @mathATb

2 years ago

Arun Debray: Differential cohomology (encyclopedia article) arxiv.org/abs/2312.14338 arxiv.org/pdf/2312.14338

0 14 42 12K 16

Nick @anisomorphism

2 years ago

The typical proof of Van Kampen's theorem, computing the fundamental group of a union or pushout of spaces, involves a choice of basepoint and the group theoretic construction of the amalgamated free product. With groupoids, it is merely a result - the structure of the product...

2 22 156 21K 90

Download Image

mmanu @[email protected] @mmanuF

3 years ago

“Genius has an important role in developing [insert a topic], but actually the knowledge itself is the result of the activity of a community. It’s the real goal of knowledge to become the knowledge of the community, not the knowledge of one or two persons.” André Joyal

1 1 4 0 0

Thomas Van Riet @ThomasVanRiet2

3 years ago

Pretty wild ideas in this talk! If all correct, this is revolutionary youtube.com/watch?v=qQ2-yt…

7 9 37 0 5

Audrey 🏳️‍⚧️ @inannabelian

3 years ago

Audrey-has-covid math thread for you all. Not actually about my thesis directly, yet, and a little more musing/philosophical than my other 4-manifolds threads I've done: Embedded Surfaces and 4-Dimensional Exotic Behavior as a Local Phenomenon 🧵1/n

2 3 33 0 18

Timothy Nguyen @IAmTimNguyen

4 years ago

Check out my latest video on @DeepMind’s recent “AI for Mathematics” breakthrough that enabled mathematicians to establish new and significant theorems. I cover the knot theory background, machine learning basics, and the Nature paper youtube.com/watch?v=UPCI1-…

3 80 392 0 151

Jake McNamara @jmcnamara18

4 years ago

Cool picture I just learned from arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/991…, which identifies non-commutative instantons with blow-ups of spacetime. The (center of mass) moduli space of two U(1) instantons on non-commutative C^2 is T^* S^2. There's a nice intuition behind this! (1/3)