Retro Future Lex @RetroFutureLex

Entertainment purposes or Entertaining a purpose . Like Velcro or a branch..the way these vibes stick with me Joined January 2011

Tweets

15K
Followers

464
Following

502
Likes

9K

Retro Future Lex @RetroFutureLex

3 weeks ago

If everything is a coincidence, then nothing truly is…

0 0 3 87 0

View Details

Retro Future Lex @RetroFutureLex

3 months ago

Lol You’re 100% wrong. You keep substituting communism for the word they actually used: Communist..They said BE A COMMUNIST, not “support communism.” You added “American” and “American patriotism” .. words that are not in the post. The definition of Patriot has nothing about “American.” You’re retrofitting the entire thing to feel better. I’m taking it at face value. No proof for your substitutions

1 0 1 24 0

View Details

Retro Future Lex @RetroFutureLex

3 months ago

This is a Declaration NOT Proposition lol They’re telling you: you can either be the one in power, or you can be the one who loves their country and obeys..That’s why you cannot be BOTH. “Choose wisely” because it’s not a choice. Classic Green Language lol

The White House @WhiteHouse

3 months ago

Choose wisely.

7K 10K 45K 1.8M 1K

2 1 11 11K 0

View Details

Retro Future Lex @RetroFutureLex

3 months ago

Nah. You have to first know how to pick up on Green Language .. You have to take them at face value. They specifically didn’t even use the word “Communism” for a reason. The word is Communist (noun). Even in the visuals it shows you black & white because there’s no room to paint (interpret) another color. Black & white palette removes any gray area & here you are trying to add it lmao Crooked tie as imperfection in the presented order. One foot in and one foot out. Reflection in the vehicle window as distorted duality. Limousine/Cadillac/hearse resonance: arrival at the transition point. This is classic green language. Half-truth: the binary “Communist or Patriot, cannot be both” presented as moral choice. Literal wording: “Communist” as the person/role in command (not everyday ideology adopter), “Patriot” as the accepting subject. The emphasis on “CANNOT BE BOTH” and “Choose wisely” is the sleight of hand declaration. The average citizen doesn’t step into that communist role, it’s a rhetorical choice . That’s why it says you cannot be both. It separates two incompatible positions: the one who controls versus the one who accepts and cheers. “Choose wisely” majority of the time isn’t used for genuine options. It’s used when the choice is rigged. Under your communism definition you can be both patriot and communist (as a patriot who loves their communist country or a communist who is patriotic about their country). Taking them face value (my definition), it shows why you can’t be both while also explaining why they said to choose wisely. The ambiguity is by design. This is what enables the green language.

2 0 1 60 0

View Details

Retro Future Lex @RetroFutureLex

3 months ago

“The general public has been brain washed by all the mass communications media into believing that communism is a movement of the so called workers.” - Myron C Fagan 1967