The Supreme Court has now heard several cases directly relating to the Jan. 6 insurrection, and they keep essentially sidestepping any engagement with the events of that day. Like many, they seem to prefer to pretend it didn't happen, which is not helpful. news.bloomberglaw.com/health-law-and…
@SergeantAqGo So if anyone storms the SCOTUS building, will they then think it’s a problem?
@SergeantAqGo @DemocraticDaisy You and the other Capitol Police didn’t have that luxury. How DARE the Supreme Court not acknowledge the gravity of that fateful day to our democracy.
@SergeantAqGo We all see it was set up and staged AF!
@SergeantAqGo The Supreme Court correctly avoids opining about events because their role is to decide questions of law, exclusively. Likewise for Appellate Courts. Findings of fact are left to the lower court where juries or judges hear witness and expert testimony, examine evidence, etc.
@SergeantAqGo The US House is now looking into the corruption by all of you that went down that day.
@SergeantAqGo That's because it's their job to make decisions based on consistent general principles, not the specifics of particular events framed disingenuously. Tell me you don't have a clue without telling me.