Sergey Karavashkin @SergeyKaravash1

Joined November 2022

Tweets

15K
Followers

294
Following

104
Likes

797

Sergey Karavashkin @SergeyKaravash1

11 hours ago

@PhilosophyOfPhy Moreover, you do not explain the physical significance of the most wave function of someone -liba, and the probability of its square does not describe the physical process, like any probability. Why advertise stupidity? 🤣

0 1 0 23 0

Sergey Karavashkin @SergeyKaravash1

11 hours ago

@PhilosophyOfPhy This is a set of absurdity, starting from the fact that during the diffraction of the wave illuminates the entire field at the same time. During the diffraction of electrons - separate points.

0 1 0 30 0

Download Image

Sergey Karavashkin @SergeyKaravash1

11 hours ago

@PhilosophyOfPhy First, the full equation has a shape en.wikipedia.org/wiki/dirac_equ… ψ (x, t) - four -component integrated wave function (Bispinor).

0 1 0 34 0

Download Image

Sergey Karavashkin @SergeyKaravash1

a day ago

@bigmonkeong И никто даже не хочет понимать, что чёрную дыру принципиально невозможно увидеть из-за дифракции. sbkaravashkin.blogspot.com/2024/09/14.html Так о каком же прогрессе знаний они говорят, подменяя наблюдения параноидальными образами затуманенного разума?

1 1 3 399 0

Download Image

Sergey Karavashkin @SergeyKaravash1

a day ago

@PhysInHistory sbkaravashkin.blogspot.com/2017/05/blog-p… sbkaravashkin.blogspot.com/2021/07/blog-p… sbkaravashkin.blogspot.com/2024/08/12.html

0 1 0 8 0

Sergey Karavashkin @SergeyKaravash1

a day ago

@PhysInHistory Yes, theoretical physics is a pathetic, dogmatized imitation of physics, incapable of development and therefore long stuck in the surrealism of naked abstraction, violating physical coherence and logic. sbkaravashkin.blogspot.com/2014/02/blog-p… sbkaravashkin.blogspot.com/2014/02/blog-p… sbkaravashkin.blogspot.com/2015/04/blog-p…

0 1 0 32 0

Sergey Karavashkin @SergeyKaravash1

a day ago

@N_D_NITE @PhilosophyOfPhy They have learned to come up with interpretations, but this is not a justification for the correctness of their fantasies. Fourier is against this, and he is more important than any idle speculation.

1 1 1 16 0

Sergey Karavashkin @SergeyKaravash1

2 days ago

@PhilosophyOfPhy Using this diagram, he derived his formula, which led the idiotic Nobel Committee to award him the prize, and for almost 80 years, idiot academics have been applauding it. A point-like photon collides with a stationary point-like electron and they fly apart at an angle? 🤣

0 1 1 70 0

Sergey Karavashkin @SergeyKaravash1

2 days ago

@PhilosophyOfPhy Compton considered the interaction of a point-like photon with a stationary electron, not a wave train, as in the figure. sbkaravashkin.blogspot.com/2013/04/blog-p…

0 1 1 101 1

Sergey Karavashkin @SergeyKaravash1

2 days ago

@ElonClipsX But such a comparison with academics is akin to comparing them to the insane. There, AI's advantages would be even greater in drawing surreal images.

0 1 3 38 0

Sergey Karavashkin @SergeyKaravash1

2 days ago

@ElonClipsX It's been verified. Grock himself admitted his inability to extrapolate knowledge. sbkaravashkin.blogspot.com/2025/01/2.html The problem is that the level of academic knowledge has sunk to the level of immoral, meaningless lies.

0 1 1 18 0

Sergey Karavashkin @SergeyKaravash1

2 days ago

@skdh This is simply the usual immoral money-laundering scheme by the mainstream, which you promoted alongside other absurd "developments" from the incompetent mainstream. sbkaravashkin.blogspot.com/2024/07/8.html

0 1 1 20 0

Sergey Karavashkin @SergeyKaravash1

2 days ago

@skdh Quantum computers rely on false entanglement for a narrow range of absurd tasks and have no value either theoretically or technologically.

0 1 1 19 0

Sergey Karavashkin @SergeyKaravash1

2 days ago

@PhilosophyOfPhy Moreover, they fail to substantiate Planck's single-frequency representation of the photon.

1 1 2 67 0

Sergey Karavashkin @SergeyKaravash1

2 days ago

@PhilosophyOfPhy What stupidity the proponents of entanglement have reached! To become entangled, photons must interact with each other. This violates the principle of superposition of light rays and the fundamental postulate of the photon concept.

0 1 2 70 0

Sergey Karavashkin @SergeyKaravash1

2 days ago

@SocraticScribe There are exceptions in EM fields, but there, too, it's important to understand what's what and why. karavashkin3.blogspot.com/2025/06/the-re… karavashkin3.blogspot.com/2025/08/groks-…

0 1 1 34 0

Sergey Karavashkin @SergeyKaravash1

2 days ago

@SocraticScribe In mechanics, Newton's third law is not violated by the interaction of material bodies, since one cannot force one interacting body to favor another.

0 1 1 20 0

Sergey Karavashkin @SergeyKaravash1

3 days ago

@GiaShi3 @skdh Then both the singularities and the simplification of the solution are preserved. But with a general algorithm, many singularities are lost. selftrans.narod.ru/v2_2/non/non28…

1 1 0 16 0

Sergey Karavashkin @SergeyKaravash1

3 days ago

@GiaShi3 @skdh Most problems have simple analytical solutions. Problems such as nonlinear relationships are significantly simplified when calculations are performed not from scratch, but at the level of a linear system based on specific rapidly converging series, rather than a general algorithm

0 1 1 17 0

Sergey Karavashkin @SergeyKaravash1

3 days ago

@GiaShi3 @skdh As a result, I calculated my first diagrams on a programmable calculator, and the accuracy increased dramatically, just as the solution itself began to reveal things that were impossible to obtain using previous methods. karavashkin3.blogspot.com/2013/10/on-bou…