Shadow Blade. ND4 @ShadowBladeYD

@Lino4Kino @frostyz @osseneth @TAYL0RWTF "Nobody in this world is not nd4.eth as nobody in this world is not Satoshi Nakamoto." robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45

@Whitecladman 我们都是ND4。

@theamigox We are all ND4.

@iamnotlosing We are all ND4.

@xodanielP We are all ND4.

I spent days tracing robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 on-chain. The deeper I went, the stranger the story became. And most people are still telling the wrong version. Here’s what I found. 1. The story didn’t start with robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45. Long before the current token existed, nd4.eth was already connected to a cluster of wallets with names like: endit.eth enditall.eth noth.eth ndnow.eth ndall.eth blackholefaller.eth taovoid.eth These weren’t just similar ENS names. There were real financial connections between them — sometimes involving hundreds of ETH. For example: noth → endit: 100 ETH enditall → endit: 338 ETH noth → blackholefaller: 250 ETH nd4 → blackholefaller: 15 ETH endit → ndnow: 35 ETH And nd4.eth and taovoid.eth even used the same intermediate wallet to route funds into the same OKX deposit infrastructure before the famous key reveal. This cluster existed before anyone knew the private key to nd4.eth. 2. The black-hole narrative existed before the famous burns. blackholefaller.eth was already active in May–June 2023. It received funds directly from: nd4.eth noth.eth endit.eth ndnow.eth So the “black hole / nothingness” theme wasn’t invented in 2026 to market a memecoin. It existed inside the ND4 wallet cluster months before nd4.eth became famous for burning millions. 3. Then came September 17, 2023. At exactly: 2023-09-17 05:23:59 UTC taovoid.eth sent an on-chain message: “Nobody in this world is not nd4.eth as nobody in this world is not Satoshi Nakamoto.” And underneath it was a 64-character string. That string wasn’t a random hash. It was the private key to nd4.eth. And our pre-key transaction analysis shows that taovoid.eth was financially connected to original nd4.eth before that key became public. So this wasn’t someone discovering the key later. The reveal appears intentional. From that moment forward, anyone could literally control the nd4.eth wallet. 4. And this is where the second mystery begins. The current robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 creator recently wrote: “Few appear to have noticed what happened on September 17.” And: “Those willing to follow the transactions beyond that date may find another story buried on-chain.” So I followed them. And something very strange happened in November 2023. 5. Before the key reveal, original ND4 received three unusual token allocations. Between August 7–9, three separate tokens were launched. FTT - Supply: 1B - Original nd4.eth received: - 100,000,000 FTT nd4.eth - Supply: 100B - Original nd4.eth received: 71,982,008,117.601019959294272857 tokens nd4 - Supply: 100M - Original nd4.eth received: 15,000,000 tokens All three allocations were received before September 17, while the ND4 private key was still private. Then they sat there. 6. November 27, 2023. More than two months after the private key became public, the wallet suddenly wakes up. And within hours, all three old pre-key allocations are moved. The 15M nd4 allocation: 150,000 → token contract 14,850,000 → new wallet The 71.982B nd4.eth allocation: 71,982,008,117.601019959294272857 → new wallet Exactly the same amount received in August. Down to the last decimal. The 100M FTT allocation: 30,000,000 → token contract 70,000,000 → another new wallet Three old allocations. Three coordinated movements. One day. 7. And here’s the weird part. They weren’t dumped. The wallet receiving 71.982B nd4.eth has no outgoing transactions. The wallet receiving 70M FTT has no outgoing transactions. The wallet receiving 14.85M nd4 held the tokens for years. No immediate: token → swap → ETH → CEX Instead, the old allocations were effectively moved into separate vault-like wallets and left there. This is probably why the current creator uses such careful wording: “On-chain evidence suggests the possibility that THE nd4.eth briefly resurfaced in November 2023.” Not proves. Suggests. Because the private key was already public. Cryptographically, anyone could have made those transactions. But the behavior is unusual. 8. Then someone else literally became nd4.eth. Fast forward to May 22, 2024. A new wallet: 0x959ac...a92b is funded from OKX. It begins funding the public nd4.eth wallet for gas. Using the public key, assets are moved and approvals are made. Then something much more important happens. The ENS Ethereum address record for: nd4.eth is changed to: 0x959ac...a92b. Someone didn’t just use the public wallet. They literally made their own wallet resolve as nd4.eth. Later, part of the extracted value follows: 0x959ac → temporary wallet → OKX 24 This looks much more like a public-key takeover than the return of the original operator. 9. Which brings us to 2026. A token called robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 launches from the historical nd4.eth address. But that alone proves nothing about the creator’s identity. The private key had been public for almost three years. And the current creator actually says this directly: “The creator of robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 is not THE nd4.eth.” Then: “As of 2023-09-17 05:23:59 UTC, we are all nd4.eth.” That changes the entire story. Maybe robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 was never supposed to represent the return of the original whale. Maybe it represents what happened after he gave the identity away. 10. So I followed the current creator’s money too. The original Pons creator-fee recipient was transferred to treasury: 0xeA13...731a. We reconstructed the payouts. Pons paid this treasury: 54.9817 ETH in creator fees. The obvious assumption: creator launches token → collects ~$130K+ → cashes out. Except that isn’t what happened. The majority of the ETH remained publicly visible in treasury. At one point we confirmed approximately: 50.62 ETH still sitting there. And treasury itself accumulated tens of millions of ND4 through public market buys. In the transaction history we analyzed, we did not find a large ND4 treasury dump. 11. Then the creator changed the fee structure. Future Pons creator fees were assigned to: 0x64Cf...228C The stated mechanism: accumulate fees → buy ND4 → burn ND4 So I checked it. Not the tweets. The transactions. And it’s real. In one analyzed period: 1.8619 ETH Pons fees ↓ market buys ↓ 10,823,028 ND4 acquired ↓ 10,823,028 ND4 → 0x000...0000 100% of ND4 received by that wallet in the dataset was burned. Later, another 24-hour sample showed: 0.815 ETH creator fees ↓ ~6.47M additional ND4 burned The mechanism was still running. 12. Treasury also kept buying. In our latest treasury export we found new purchases on September 13, 14 and 16. Approximately: 0.90 ETH → ~7.85M additional ND4 And again: no corresponding ND4 sale appeared in the export. So the current structure looks roughly like: TREASURY → accumulates ND4 while CREATOR FEES → buy ND4 → burn ND4. There is one major caveat: the fee mechanism is still centralized and revocable. The creator can potentially change it. That remains one of the biggest risks. 13. So what is ND4 actually? I started this investigation asking: “Did the millionaire who burned millions in 2023 return and launch a memecoin?” After following the transactions, I think that’s the wrong question. The original ND4 burned wealth. Then an identity connected to him published the private key to nd4.eth. After that, other people really did begin using the identity. In 2024 someone literally redirected nd4.eth to themselves. And in 2026 another operator used that public identity to create robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45. Which makes the old message hit differently:“Nobody in this world is not nd4.eth.” Maybe it wasn’t philosophy. Maybe it was an instruction. The key was public. Anyone could become ND4. And they did. Now the token creator says: “we are all nd4.eth now you understand.” Maybe we finally do. robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 #RobinhoodChain @nd4doteth

x.com/i/article/2100…

@Indexedex Since the bonding curve and dual-pricing mechanism remain unchanged, this massive premium gap is mathematically bound to happen again. My question is: when the inner reserve price skyrockets next time, are you going to step in and execute another 'rebalancing'?

we are all nd4.eth now you understand

We are ND4. "Nobody in this world is not nd4.eth as nobody in this world is not Satoshi Nakamoto." robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45

x.com/i/article/2067…

x.com/i/article/2064…

有东西

danny @agintender

9 months ago

x.com/i/article/2013…

39 52 229 112K 257

有点东西。。。卡司选的也还挺好

el.cine @EHuanglu

10 months ago

Hollywood is literally over

222 424 5K 1.2M 2K

@YeeErc20 $YEE NEVA EVA LOSE!

@thetostoo @_Shadow36 $YEE

@TSPsniper $YEE TO DA MOON!

@Saori_Araki_fan That’s $YEE, dino season coming!

@YeeErc20 YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!

@thetostoo @Bancrypto__ $YEE about to explode!